青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的生活质量是否较长时间的融合更差?2年随访

Q4 Medicine Coluna/ Columna Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s1808-185120222102261930
Amauri Chaves Filho, Jeinnifer Zanardo Quaggiotto, Igor de Barcellos Zanon, José lucas Batista Júnior, I. M. Cardoso, Charbel Jacob Júnior
{"title":"青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的生活质量是否较长时间的融合更差?2年随访","authors":"Amauri Chaves Filho, Jeinnifer Zanardo Quaggiotto, Igor de Barcellos Zanon, José lucas Batista Júnior, I. M. Cardoso, Charbel Jacob Júnior","doi":"10.1590/s1808-185120222102261930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To compare quality of life in patients with longer fusions with that of those who have short fusions 2 years of after surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective comparative cohort study (Level of Evidence III) involving patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws with a 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome was quality of life assessed using the SRS-30 questionnaire. Participants were divided according to Lenke and stratified into those with major (Lenke 3 and Lenke 6) and minor (Lenke 1 and Lenke 5) fusions. Results: Forty-one patients, 34 of whom were women, were evaluated: Lenke 1 (17 patients), Lenke 3 (15 patients), Lenke 5 (3 patients), and Lenke 6 (6 patients). The mean age was 13.8 years, the mean preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were 56.48 degrees and 10.49 degrees, respectively, and the mean surgical Cobb reduction was 45.54 degrees. All patients in the sample showed an overall improvement in quality of life after surgery (p<0.0001). There was no difference between groups A (long fusions) and B (short fusions) in relation to the domains in general (p>0.05). Although pain was improved in the overall sample, this was not the case for the group with structured double curves and longer fusions (p = 0.03). Conclusion: There was no difference in quality of life between patients with long and short fusions with a 2-year follow-up. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective cohort.","PeriodicalId":40025,"journal":{"name":"Coluna/ Columna","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP\",\"authors\":\"Amauri Chaves Filho, Jeinnifer Zanardo Quaggiotto, Igor de Barcellos Zanon, José lucas Batista Júnior, I. M. Cardoso, Charbel Jacob Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1808-185120222102261930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective: To compare quality of life in patients with longer fusions with that of those who have short fusions 2 years of after surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective comparative cohort study (Level of Evidence III) involving patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws with a 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome was quality of life assessed using the SRS-30 questionnaire. Participants were divided according to Lenke and stratified into those with major (Lenke 3 and Lenke 6) and minor (Lenke 1 and Lenke 5) fusions. Results: Forty-one patients, 34 of whom were women, were evaluated: Lenke 1 (17 patients), Lenke 3 (15 patients), Lenke 5 (3 patients), and Lenke 6 (6 patients). The mean age was 13.8 years, the mean preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were 56.48 degrees and 10.49 degrees, respectively, and the mean surgical Cobb reduction was 45.54 degrees. All patients in the sample showed an overall improvement in quality of life after surgery (p<0.0001). There was no difference between groups A (long fusions) and B (short fusions) in relation to the domains in general (p>0.05). Although pain was improved in the overall sample, this was not the case for the group with structured double curves and longer fusions (p = 0.03). Conclusion: There was no difference in quality of life between patients with long and short fusions with a 2-year follow-up. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective cohort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coluna/ Columna\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coluna/ Columna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222102261930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coluna/ Columna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222102261930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较术后2年较长融合时间与较短融合时间患者的生活质量。方法:这是一项回顾性比较队列研究(证据水平为III),涉及青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者,他们接受后路椎弓根螺钉融合术,随访2年。主要结果是使用SRS-30问卷评估生活质量。参与者根据Lenke进行分组,分为大融合组(Lenke 3和Lenke 6)和小融合组(Lenke 1和Lenke 5)。结果:共纳入41例患者,其中女性34例:Lenke 1(17例)、Lenke 3(15例)、Lenke 5(3例)、Lenke 6(6例)。平均年龄13.8岁,术前术后平均Cobb角分别为56.48度和10.49度,手术平均Cobb复位为45.54度。所有患者术后生活质量均有整体改善(p0.05)。虽然疼痛在整个样本中得到了改善,但对于结构双曲线和较长融合的组,情况并非如此(p = 0.03)。结论:经2年随访,长、短融合患者的生活质量无明显差异。证据等级III;回顾性队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare quality of life in patients with longer fusions with that of those who have short fusions 2 years of after surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective comparative cohort study (Level of Evidence III) involving patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws with a 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome was quality of life assessed using the SRS-30 questionnaire. Participants were divided according to Lenke and stratified into those with major (Lenke 3 and Lenke 6) and minor (Lenke 1 and Lenke 5) fusions. Results: Forty-one patients, 34 of whom were women, were evaluated: Lenke 1 (17 patients), Lenke 3 (15 patients), Lenke 5 (3 patients), and Lenke 6 (6 patients). The mean age was 13.8 years, the mean preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were 56.48 degrees and 10.49 degrees, respectively, and the mean surgical Cobb reduction was 45.54 degrees. All patients in the sample showed an overall improvement in quality of life after surgery (p<0.0001). There was no difference between groups A (long fusions) and B (short fusions) in relation to the domains in general (p>0.05). Although pain was improved in the overall sample, this was not the case for the group with structured double curves and longer fusions (p = 0.03). Conclusion: There was no difference in quality of life between patients with long and short fusions with a 2-year follow-up. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective cohort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coluna/ Columna
Coluna/ Columna Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: PROGRESSION OF UNTREATED CASES FUNCTIONALITY OF INDIVIDUALS WITH LOW BACK PAIN: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY WITH ICF CORE SET ANESTHETIC BLOCK OF THE INTERTRANSVERSE SEPTUM, A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY LUMBAR LORDOSIS VARIATION ACCORDING THE TYPE OF POSITIONER USED IN LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS CLINICAL PHOTOGRAPHIC AND RADIOLOGICAL CORRELATION IN PATIENTS WITH SCOLIOSIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1