Raimundo Fabricio Seade Vieira, Isabella Guirelli Santana, Daniel Pereira Rezende de Almeida, Luciano Elias Barboza, Fernando William Figueiredo da Rosa
{"title":"后凸成形术或椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性脊柱骨折:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Raimundo Fabricio Seade Vieira, Isabella Guirelli Santana, Daniel Pereira Rezende de Almeida, Luciano Elias Barboza, Fernando William Figueiredo da Rosa","doi":"10.1590/s1808-185120222102257080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) are both widely adopted treatments for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF), however, which of these techniques is more effective has not yet been established. We performed a systematic review of articles, followed by meta-analysis, in an attempt to establish the differences between KP and VP. Initially, 187 articles were obtained, 20 of which were systematically reviewed and submitted to meta-analysis. Thus, 2,226 patients comprised the universe of the present article, 1202 of whom underwent KP and 1024 of whom underwent VP. The statistically significant results observed included lower mean bone cement leakage (ml) in the group submitted to kyphoplasty, with OR: 1.50 [CI95%: 1.16 - 1.95], p <0.05; shorter mean surgical time (minutes), 0.45 [CI90% 0.08 - 0.82], p <0.1, for the group submitted to VP as compared to the KP group; and a lower mean postoperative Oswestry Disability Index score in the KP group, OR: −0.14 [CI95%: −0.28 - 0.01], p <0.05. KP was more effective in improving physical function and had a lower frequency of cement leakage when compared to VP, although it requires longer surgical time. Level of evidence III; Systematic review of level III studies.","PeriodicalId":40025,"journal":{"name":"Coluna/ Columna","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OSTEOPOROTIC SPINE FRACTURES TREATED WITH KYPHOPLASTY OR VERTEBROPLASTY: A META-ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"Raimundo Fabricio Seade Vieira, Isabella Guirelli Santana, Daniel Pereira Rezende de Almeida, Luciano Elias Barboza, Fernando William Figueiredo da Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1808-185120222102257080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) are both widely adopted treatments for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF), however, which of these techniques is more effective has not yet been established. We performed a systematic review of articles, followed by meta-analysis, in an attempt to establish the differences between KP and VP. Initially, 187 articles were obtained, 20 of which were systematically reviewed and submitted to meta-analysis. Thus, 2,226 patients comprised the universe of the present article, 1202 of whom underwent KP and 1024 of whom underwent VP. The statistically significant results observed included lower mean bone cement leakage (ml) in the group submitted to kyphoplasty, with OR: 1.50 [CI95%: 1.16 - 1.95], p <0.05; shorter mean surgical time (minutes), 0.45 [CI90% 0.08 - 0.82], p <0.1, for the group submitted to VP as compared to the KP group; and a lower mean postoperative Oswestry Disability Index score in the KP group, OR: −0.14 [CI95%: −0.28 - 0.01], p <0.05. KP was more effective in improving physical function and had a lower frequency of cement leakage when compared to VP, although it requires longer surgical time. Level of evidence III; Systematic review of level III studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coluna/ Columna\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coluna/ Columna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222102257080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coluna/ Columna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222102257080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
后凸成形术(KP)和椎体成形术(VP)都是骨质疏松性椎体骨折(OVF)患者广泛采用的治疗方法,然而,哪一种技术更有效尚未确定。我们对文章进行了系统回顾,随后进行了荟萃分析,试图确定KP和VP之间的差异。最初,获得187篇文章,其中20篇被系统回顾并提交meta分析。因此,本文纳入了2226例患者,其中1202例接受了KP, 1024例接受了VP。后凸成形术组平均骨水泥漏量(ml)较前凸成形术组低,OR: 1.50 [ci95: 1.16 ~ 1.95], p <0.05;与KP组相比,VP组的平均手术时间(分钟)较短,为0.45 [CI90% 0.08 - 0.82], p <0.1;KP组术后Oswestry残疾指数平均评分较低,OR:−0.14 [CI95%:−0.28 - 0.01],p <0.05。与VP相比,KP在改善身体功能方面更有效,水泥漏的频率更低,尽管需要更长的手术时间。证据等级III;III级研究的系统评价。
OSTEOPOROTIC SPINE FRACTURES TREATED WITH KYPHOPLASTY OR VERTEBROPLASTY: A META-ANALYSIS
ABSTRACT Kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) are both widely adopted treatments for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF), however, which of these techniques is more effective has not yet been established. We performed a systematic review of articles, followed by meta-analysis, in an attempt to establish the differences between KP and VP. Initially, 187 articles were obtained, 20 of which were systematically reviewed and submitted to meta-analysis. Thus, 2,226 patients comprised the universe of the present article, 1202 of whom underwent KP and 1024 of whom underwent VP. The statistically significant results observed included lower mean bone cement leakage (ml) in the group submitted to kyphoplasty, with OR: 1.50 [CI95%: 1.16 - 1.95], p <0.05; shorter mean surgical time (minutes), 0.45 [CI90% 0.08 - 0.82], p <0.1, for the group submitted to VP as compared to the KP group; and a lower mean postoperative Oswestry Disability Index score in the KP group, OR: −0.14 [CI95%: −0.28 - 0.01], p <0.05. KP was more effective in improving physical function and had a lower frequency of cement leakage when compared to VP, although it requires longer surgical time. Level of evidence III; Systematic review of level III studies.