P. Bazán, Ricardo Cepeda Jordan, Juan Romel Medina Cevallos, A. O. G. Adaro, J. C. S. Adaro
{"title":"Hounsfield单元在脊柱手术计划中的应用:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"P. Bazán, Ricardo Cepeda Jordan, Juan Romel Medina Cevallos, A. O. G. Adaro, J. C. S. Adaro","doi":"10.1590/s1808-185120222103264579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Bone mineral density is a crucial factor in the success or failure of osteosynthesis in spine surgery; it shows the onset of osteoporosis and related complications. Its evaluation is verified by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and Hounsfield Unit (HU) measurement by CT scan. Objective: Determine the use of HU in surgical planning; compare utility in diagnosing osteoporosis by DEXA; and evaluate sensitivity in predicting complications. Method: A systemic literature review was conducted on PubMed, in line with PRISMA methodology. Including those who justified the use of pre-surgical planning, compared HU/DEXA, and assessed complications. For the statistical analysis, the χ2 was used. Results: 57 articles were identified by selecting nine that met the inclusion criteria. In patients undergoing spinal surgery for fixation and fusion for degenerative pathology, HU measurement showed a prevalence of osteoporosis of 58.5% (sensitivity 93.26%; specificity 90.22%), osteoporosis-associated complications of 24.5%, proper diagnosis of 71.98%, and screw release rate of 82.31%. Conclusions: UH measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis turns out to be more sensitive, specific, and predictive compared to DEXA, especially in elderly patients; it represents a useful tool in planning spinal surgery, minimizing the risk of complications such as screw release, fractures, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence of intersomatic devices, and kyphosis of the proximal junction. Level of evidence II; Study Design: Systematic Review and meta-analysis.","PeriodicalId":40025,"journal":{"name":"Coluna/ Columna","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"P. Bazán, Ricardo Cepeda Jordan, Juan Romel Medina Cevallos, A. O. G. Adaro, J. C. S. Adaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1808-185120222103264579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Bone mineral density is a crucial factor in the success or failure of osteosynthesis in spine surgery; it shows the onset of osteoporosis and related complications. Its evaluation is verified by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and Hounsfield Unit (HU) measurement by CT scan. Objective: Determine the use of HU in surgical planning; compare utility in diagnosing osteoporosis by DEXA; and evaluate sensitivity in predicting complications. Method: A systemic literature review was conducted on PubMed, in line with PRISMA methodology. Including those who justified the use of pre-surgical planning, compared HU/DEXA, and assessed complications. For the statistical analysis, the χ2 was used. Results: 57 articles were identified by selecting nine that met the inclusion criteria. In patients undergoing spinal surgery for fixation and fusion for degenerative pathology, HU measurement showed a prevalence of osteoporosis of 58.5% (sensitivity 93.26%; specificity 90.22%), osteoporosis-associated complications of 24.5%, proper diagnosis of 71.98%, and screw release rate of 82.31%. Conclusions: UH measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis turns out to be more sensitive, specific, and predictive compared to DEXA, especially in elderly patients; it represents a useful tool in planning spinal surgery, minimizing the risk of complications such as screw release, fractures, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence of intersomatic devices, and kyphosis of the proximal junction. Level of evidence II; Study Design: Systematic Review and meta-analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coluna/ Columna\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coluna/ Columna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222103264579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coluna/ Columna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222103264579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
骨矿物质密度是决定脊柱手术植骨成功或失败的关键因素;它显示了骨质疏松症和相关并发症的发生。通过双能x射线吸收仪(DEXA)和Hounsfield Unit (HU) CT扫描测量验证了其评价。目的:确定HU在手术计划中的应用;DEXA在骨质疏松症诊断中的应用比较;并评估预测并发症的敏感性。方法:采用PRISMA方法学对PubMed进行系统文献综述。包括那些合理使用术前计划的患者,比较HU/DEXA,并评估并发症。统计学分析采用χ2。结果:共筛选出符合纳入标准的9篇,共鉴定出57篇。在因退行性病理而接受脊柱手术固定融合的患者中,HU测量显示骨质疏松症的患病率为58.5%(敏感性为93.26%;特异性90.22%),骨质疏松相关并发症24.5%,正确诊断率71.98%,螺钉松解率82.31%。结论:与DEXA相比,UH测量对骨质疏松症的诊断更加敏感、特异性和预测性,特别是在老年患者中;它是规划脊柱手术的有用工具,可最大限度地减少并发症的风险,如螺钉松脱、骨折、假关节、体间装置下沉和近端关节后凸。证据等级II;研究设计:系统评价和荟萃分析。
HOUNSFIELD UNITS USE IN SPINAL SURGERY PLANNING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
ABSTRACT Bone mineral density is a crucial factor in the success or failure of osteosynthesis in spine surgery; it shows the onset of osteoporosis and related complications. Its evaluation is verified by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and Hounsfield Unit (HU) measurement by CT scan. Objective: Determine the use of HU in surgical planning; compare utility in diagnosing osteoporosis by DEXA; and evaluate sensitivity in predicting complications. Method: A systemic literature review was conducted on PubMed, in line with PRISMA methodology. Including those who justified the use of pre-surgical planning, compared HU/DEXA, and assessed complications. For the statistical analysis, the χ2 was used. Results: 57 articles were identified by selecting nine that met the inclusion criteria. In patients undergoing spinal surgery for fixation and fusion for degenerative pathology, HU measurement showed a prevalence of osteoporosis of 58.5% (sensitivity 93.26%; specificity 90.22%), osteoporosis-associated complications of 24.5%, proper diagnosis of 71.98%, and screw release rate of 82.31%. Conclusions: UH measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis turns out to be more sensitive, specific, and predictive compared to DEXA, especially in elderly patients; it represents a useful tool in planning spinal surgery, minimizing the risk of complications such as screw release, fractures, pseudoarthrosis, subsidence of intersomatic devices, and kyphosis of the proximal junction. Level of evidence II; Study Design: Systematic Review and meta-analysis.