M. Daher, Ricardo Vieira Teles Filho, Wender Gonçalves Moura, Paulo Henrique, Lucas Lodomiro, Pedro Felisbino Jr, Juliane leite Orcino, Sérgio Daher
{"title":"术中牵引与第三临时棒新矫正技术对脑瘫脊柱侧凸手术矫正的影像学评价","authors":"M. Daher, Ricardo Vieira Teles Filho, Wender Gonçalves Moura, Paulo Henrique, Lucas Lodomiro, Pedro Felisbino Jr, Juliane leite Orcino, Sérgio Daher","doi":"10.1590/s1808-185120222201235863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate the radiographic results of patients with cerebral palsy and Lonstein and Akbarnia type II scoliosis who underwent intraoperative halofemoral traction (IFAT) and correction with a 3rd provisional nail. Methods: Retrospective case series study. Were evaluated preoperative (PRE), traction (TR), immediate (POI), and late (POT) total spine radiographs. Were verified the angular value of the main curve (COBB), pelvic obliquity (OP), trunk balance in the coronal plane (CSVA), vertical sagittal alignment (SVA), curve flexibility, and percentage of correction in the final PO. Friedam and Wilcoxon tests were performed (p<0.05). Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 16 (±4.13). There was a statistical difference when comparing COBB PRE with TRACTION to POI and POT (p=0.0001), OP in PRE with TRACTION, and between PRE and POT (p=0.0001). There was a statistical difference in coronal (CSVA) and sagittal (SVA) balance concerning PRE and POT. The percentage of correction for the main curve was 55.75% (± 11.11), and for the O P, 64.86% (± 18.04). Conclusion: The correction technique using the 3rd provisional nail technique and intraoperative traction presents a correction power of 55.75% of the proximal curve and 64% of the pelvic obliquity. In addition, it is easy to assemble, has a short surgical time, and causes little loss of correction during follow-up. Level of Evidence III B; I study a series of retrospective cases.","PeriodicalId":40025,"journal":{"name":"Coluna/ Columna","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF SURGICAL CORRECTION OF SCOLIOSIS DUE TO CEREBRAL PALSY USING INTRA-OPERATIVE TRACTION AND NEW CORRECTION TECHNIQUE WITH 3RD PROVISIONAL ROD\",\"authors\":\"M. Daher, Ricardo Vieira Teles Filho, Wender Gonçalves Moura, Paulo Henrique, Lucas Lodomiro, Pedro Felisbino Jr, Juliane leite Orcino, Sérgio Daher\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1808-185120222201235863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate the radiographic results of patients with cerebral palsy and Lonstein and Akbarnia type II scoliosis who underwent intraoperative halofemoral traction (IFAT) and correction with a 3rd provisional nail. Methods: Retrospective case series study. Were evaluated preoperative (PRE), traction (TR), immediate (POI), and late (POT) total spine radiographs. Were verified the angular value of the main curve (COBB), pelvic obliquity (OP), trunk balance in the coronal plane (CSVA), vertical sagittal alignment (SVA), curve flexibility, and percentage of correction in the final PO. Friedam and Wilcoxon tests were performed (p<0.05). Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 16 (±4.13). There was a statistical difference when comparing COBB PRE with TRACTION to POI and POT (p=0.0001), OP in PRE with TRACTION, and between PRE and POT (p=0.0001). There was a statistical difference in coronal (CSVA) and sagittal (SVA) balance concerning PRE and POT. The percentage of correction for the main curve was 55.75% (± 11.11), and for the O P, 64.86% (± 18.04). Conclusion: The correction technique using the 3rd provisional nail technique and intraoperative traction presents a correction power of 55.75% of the proximal curve and 64% of the pelvic obliquity. In addition, it is easy to assemble, has a short surgical time, and causes little loss of correction during follow-up. Level of Evidence III B; I study a series of retrospective cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coluna/ Columna\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coluna/ Columna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222201235863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coluna/ Columna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1808-185120222201235863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
【摘要】目的:评价脑瘫合并Lonstein和Akbarnia型脊柱侧凸患者行术中halemoral牵引(IFAT)和第三临时钉矫正的影像学结果。方法:回顾性病例系列研究。评估术前(PRE)、牵引(TR)、即刻(POI)和晚期(POT)全脊柱x线片。验证主曲线的角度值(COBB)、骨盆倾角(OP)、躯干在冠状面平衡(CSVA)、垂直矢状面对齐(SVA)、曲线灵活性和最终PO的矫正百分比。进行Friedam和Wilcoxon检验(p<0.05)。结果:21例患者纳入研究,平均年龄16岁(±4.13岁)。COBB PRE + TRACTION与POI + POT比较有统计学差异(p=0.0001), PRE + TRACTION的OP与PRE + POT比较有统计学差异(p=0.0001)。PRE和POT在冠状面(CSVA)和矢状面(SVA)平衡上有统计学差异。主曲线校正率为55.75%(±11.11),O P校正率为64.86%(±18.04)。结论:采用第3临时钉技术配合术中牵引的矫正技术,近端侧弯矫正率为55.75%,骨盆斜度矫正率为64%。此外,它易于组装,手术时间短,并且在随访时造成的矫正损失很小。证据等级III B;我研究了一系列回顾性案例。
RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF SURGICAL CORRECTION OF SCOLIOSIS DUE TO CEREBRAL PALSY USING INTRA-OPERATIVE TRACTION AND NEW CORRECTION TECHNIQUE WITH 3RD PROVISIONAL ROD
ABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate the radiographic results of patients with cerebral palsy and Lonstein and Akbarnia type II scoliosis who underwent intraoperative halofemoral traction (IFAT) and correction with a 3rd provisional nail. Methods: Retrospective case series study. Were evaluated preoperative (PRE), traction (TR), immediate (POI), and late (POT) total spine radiographs. Were verified the angular value of the main curve (COBB), pelvic obliquity (OP), trunk balance in the coronal plane (CSVA), vertical sagittal alignment (SVA), curve flexibility, and percentage of correction in the final PO. Friedam and Wilcoxon tests were performed (p<0.05). Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 16 (±4.13). There was a statistical difference when comparing COBB PRE with TRACTION to POI and POT (p=0.0001), OP in PRE with TRACTION, and between PRE and POT (p=0.0001). There was a statistical difference in coronal (CSVA) and sagittal (SVA) balance concerning PRE and POT. The percentage of correction for the main curve was 55.75% (± 11.11), and for the O P, 64.86% (± 18.04). Conclusion: The correction technique using the 3rd provisional nail technique and intraoperative traction presents a correction power of 55.75% of the proximal curve and 64% of the pelvic obliquity. In addition, it is easy to assemble, has a short surgical time, and causes little loss of correction during follow-up. Level of Evidence III B; I study a series of retrospective cases.