古代犹太文学的连贯标准

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1628/hebai-2020-0008
D. Teeter, William A. Tooman
{"title":"古代犹太文学的连贯标准","authors":"D. Teeter, William A. Tooman","doi":"10.1628/hebai-2020-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coherence—whether understood narrowly as compatibility between constituents of a textual world, or quite broadly as a regulative principle applying to all areas of text production and reception—is a constitutive feature of textuality.2 While there is much disagreement about the concept, all agree that “coherence” is a fundamental ingredient of a “text” as such—or at least of its meaningful experience. It is an expectation brought to anything that might be considered a ‘text,’ though it is not found in equal measure in every text.3 The degree and kind of coherence expected of a text (and the effort exerted to satisfy such expectations) depend on a variety of factors.4 This article sketches an anatomy of issues representing key points of debate, differences in approach, and decisions that must be made in the attempt to understand coherence and incoherence in ancient Jewish literature. One of several key difficulties in assessing the","PeriodicalId":42564,"journal":{"name":"Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards of (In)coherence in Ancient Jewish Literature\",\"authors\":\"D. Teeter, William A. Tooman\",\"doi\":\"10.1628/hebai-2020-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coherence—whether understood narrowly as compatibility between constituents of a textual world, or quite broadly as a regulative principle applying to all areas of text production and reception—is a constitutive feature of textuality.2 While there is much disagreement about the concept, all agree that “coherence” is a fundamental ingredient of a “text” as such—or at least of its meaningful experience. It is an expectation brought to anything that might be considered a ‘text,’ though it is not found in equal measure in every text.3 The degree and kind of coherence expected of a text (and the effort exerted to satisfy such expectations) depend on a variety of factors.4 This article sketches an anatomy of issues representing key points of debate, differences in approach, and decisions that must be made in the attempt to understand coherence and incoherence in ancient Jewish literature. One of several key difficulties in assessing the\",\"PeriodicalId\":42564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1628/hebai-2020-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1628/hebai-2020-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

连贯性——无论是狭义地理解为文本世界各成分之间的兼容性,还是广义地理解为适用于文本生产和接受的所有领域的调节原则——都是文本性的构成特征虽然对这个概念有很多分歧,但所有人都同意“连贯”是“文本”本身的基本要素,或者至少是其有意义的体验的基本要素。这是一种对任何可能被认为是“文本”的东西的期望,尽管它在每个文本中所占的比例并不相同对文本的连贯程度和类型的期望(以及为满足这种期望所付出的努力)取决于多种因素本文概述了代表辩论要点的问题的解剖,方法上的差异,以及在试图理解古代犹太文学的一致性和不一致性时必须做出的决定。评估的几个关键困难之一
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Standards of (In)coherence in Ancient Jewish Literature
Coherence—whether understood narrowly as compatibility between constituents of a textual world, or quite broadly as a regulative principle applying to all areas of text production and reception—is a constitutive feature of textuality.2 While there is much disagreement about the concept, all agree that “coherence” is a fundamental ingredient of a “text” as such—or at least of its meaningful experience. It is an expectation brought to anything that might be considered a ‘text,’ though it is not found in equal measure in every text.3 The degree and kind of coherence expected of a text (and the effort exerted to satisfy such expectations) depend on a variety of factors.4 This article sketches an anatomy of issues representing key points of debate, differences in approach, and decisions that must be made in the attempt to understand coherence and incoherence in ancient Jewish literature. One of several key difficulties in assessing the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Jerusalem in History Judeans in Persian and Hellenistic Egypt – Social Settings and Literary Productions The Wandering Arameans in Egypt Jewish Life in Egypt in the Light of the Herakleopolis Papyri The Social Integration of Judeans in Ptolemaic Egypt and the Egyptian Influences on their Literary Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1