《列王纪下》第24-25章和《耶利米书》第52章是关于征服巴比伦的不同和一致的记忆

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1628/hebai-2021-0003
Sonja Ammann
{"title":"《列王纪下》第24-25章和《耶利米书》第52章是关于征服巴比伦的不同和一致的记忆","authors":"Sonja Ammann","doi":"10.1628/hebai-2021-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accounts of the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem in Jeremiah 52 and 2 Kings 24:18–25:30 are virtually identical and seem to convey a unified memory of this historical event. However, a closer examination of the Hebrew and Greek texts reveals that these nearly identical accounts are the result of a longer process of textual changes. The unified memory on the surface conceals an underlying pluriformity of memories. A comparison between the account in 2 Kings 24:18–25:30 and the parallels in Jeremiah can thus serve as a case study on how the Babylonian conquest was construed as a cultural trauma in ancient Israel's collective memory.","PeriodicalId":42564,"journal":{"name":"Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second Kings 24–25 and Jeremiah 52 as Diverging and Converging Memories of the Babylonian Conquest\",\"authors\":\"Sonja Ammann\",\"doi\":\"10.1628/hebai-2021-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The accounts of the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem in Jeremiah 52 and 2 Kings 24:18–25:30 are virtually identical and seem to convey a unified memory of this historical event. However, a closer examination of the Hebrew and Greek texts reveals that these nearly identical accounts are the result of a longer process of textual changes. The unified memory on the surface conceals an underlying pluriformity of memories. A comparison between the account in 2 Kings 24:18–25:30 and the parallels in Jeremiah can thus serve as a case study on how the Babylonian conquest was construed as a cultural trauma in ancient Israel's collective memory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1628/hebai-2021-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1628/hebai-2021-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

耶利米书52章和列王纪下24:18-25:30章对巴比伦人征服耶路撒冷的描述几乎是相同的,似乎传达了对这一历史事件的统一记忆。然而,对希伯来文和希腊文文本的仔细研究表明,这些几乎相同的描述是文本变化的长期过程的结果。表面上的统一记忆隐藏着记忆的多样性。因此,将列王纪下24:18-25:30的记载与耶利米书中的相似之处进行比较,可以作为一个案例来研究征服巴比伦是如何被解释为古代以色列集体记忆中的文化创伤的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Second Kings 24–25 and Jeremiah 52 as Diverging and Converging Memories of the Babylonian Conquest
The accounts of the Babylonian conquest of Jerusalem in Jeremiah 52 and 2 Kings 24:18–25:30 are virtually identical and seem to convey a unified memory of this historical event. However, a closer examination of the Hebrew and Greek texts reveals that these nearly identical accounts are the result of a longer process of textual changes. The unified memory on the surface conceals an underlying pluriformity of memories. A comparison between the account in 2 Kings 24:18–25:30 and the parallels in Jeremiah can thus serve as a case study on how the Babylonian conquest was construed as a cultural trauma in ancient Israel's collective memory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Jerusalem in History Judeans in Persian and Hellenistic Egypt – Social Settings and Literary Productions The Wandering Arameans in Egypt Jewish Life in Egypt in the Light of the Herakleopolis Papyri The Social Integration of Judeans in Ptolemaic Egypt and the Egyptian Influences on their Literary Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1