巴西葡萄牙语衍生词的韵律化:结合视角

L. C. Schwindt, Leda Bisol
{"title":"巴西葡萄牙语衍生词的韵律化:结合视角","authors":"L. C. Schwindt, Leda Bisol","doi":"10.1590/1678-460x202258877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper revisits and extends the debate on the prosodic status of affixed words in Brazilian Portuguese within the Optimality Theory framework, especially based on Selkirk (1996) and Itô & Mester (2008)’s proposals, according to which violable universal constraints are responsible for mapping grammatical and prosodic structures at the expense of a possible disobedience to certain principles of the prosodic hierarchy. Starting from a review of the literature on the topic, we bring together ideas from our previous studies (Bisol, 2000, 2004, 2007; Schwindt, 2001, 2008, 2013) to argue that affixed words in Brazilian Portuguese are subject to three types of prosodization - composition, adjunction and incorporation - prefixes being subject to all three, while suffixes only to incorporation and composition, not to adjunction. In contrast, clitics are characterized as structures labeled as attached to their hosts. The evidence comes especially from the diagnostics of stress assignment, but also from other word domain processes. Based on this description, we problematize some consequences of this typology for the organization of the prosodic hierarchy and its effects on morphological transparency by defending a continuum that goes from composite to incorporated structures.","PeriodicalId":35332,"journal":{"name":"DELTA Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prosodization of derived words in Brazilian Portuguese: Joining perspectives\",\"authors\":\"L. C. Schwindt, Leda Bisol\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1678-460x202258877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper revisits and extends the debate on the prosodic status of affixed words in Brazilian Portuguese within the Optimality Theory framework, especially based on Selkirk (1996) and Itô & Mester (2008)’s proposals, according to which violable universal constraints are responsible for mapping grammatical and prosodic structures at the expense of a possible disobedience to certain principles of the prosodic hierarchy. Starting from a review of the literature on the topic, we bring together ideas from our previous studies (Bisol, 2000, 2004, 2007; Schwindt, 2001, 2008, 2013) to argue that affixed words in Brazilian Portuguese are subject to three types of prosodization - composition, adjunction and incorporation - prefixes being subject to all three, while suffixes only to incorporation and composition, not to adjunction. In contrast, clitics are characterized as structures labeled as attached to their hosts. The evidence comes especially from the diagnostics of stress assignment, but also from other word domain processes. Based on this description, we problematize some consequences of this typology for the organization of the prosodic hierarchy and its effects on morphological transparency by defending a continuum that goes from composite to incorporated structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DELTA Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DELTA Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460x202258877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DELTA Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460x202258877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在最优性理论框架下,特别是基于Selkirk(1996)和Itô & Mester(2008)的建议,回顾并扩展了巴西葡萄牙语中附加词韵律地位的争论,根据这些建议,违反普遍约束负责映射语法和韵律结构,其代价是可能违背韵律层次的某些原则。从回顾有关该主题的文献开始,我们汇集了以前研究的想法(Bisol, 2000,2004,2007;Schwindt, 2001, 2008, 2013)认为巴西葡萄牙语中的附加词受三种韵律化的影响-构成,附加和合并-前缀受三种韵律化的影响,而后缀只受合并和构成的影响,而不受附加的影响。相比之下,政治政治的特点是被标记为附着在其宿主上的结构。证据主要来自于对应力分配的诊断,但也来自于其他词域过程。基于这一描述,我们提出了这一类型学对韵律层次组织的一些后果,以及通过捍卫从复合结构到合并结构的连续体对形态透明度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The prosodization of derived words in Brazilian Portuguese: Joining perspectives
ABSTRACT This paper revisits and extends the debate on the prosodic status of affixed words in Brazilian Portuguese within the Optimality Theory framework, especially based on Selkirk (1996) and Itô & Mester (2008)’s proposals, according to which violable universal constraints are responsible for mapping grammatical and prosodic structures at the expense of a possible disobedience to certain principles of the prosodic hierarchy. Starting from a review of the literature on the topic, we bring together ideas from our previous studies (Bisol, 2000, 2004, 2007; Schwindt, 2001, 2008, 2013) to argue that affixed words in Brazilian Portuguese are subject to three types of prosodization - composition, adjunction and incorporation - prefixes being subject to all three, while suffixes only to incorporation and composition, not to adjunction. In contrast, clitics are characterized as structures labeled as attached to their hosts. The evidence comes especially from the diagnostics of stress assignment, but also from other word domain processes. Based on this description, we problematize some consequences of this typology for the organization of the prosodic hierarchy and its effects on morphological transparency by defending a continuum that goes from composite to incorporated structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DELTA Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada
DELTA Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada - DELTA is published by the Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo / PUC-SP. DELTA has been published since 1985, and in 1992 it became a biannual publication. Editions are published in February and August. The journal is addressed to all areas of study concerning language and speech, whether theoretical or applied; however, only unpublished contributions will be considered. To briefly refer to the journal, the short title DELTA is recommended regarding bibliographies, footnotes, as well as bibliographical strips and references.
期刊最新文献
A Survey on Generic Impersonal Structures in Brazilian Portuguese O contato linguístico e a aquisição da linguagem: considerações sobre a produção variável da concordância de número no português brasileiro, Desenvolvimento da consciência morfológica no 1º ciclo Características grafofonéticas das vogais francesas na gramática o Mestre francez ou novo methodo para aprender a lingua franceza por meio da portugueza de Francisco Clamopin Durand A oralidade no processo de alfabetização: o debate (sempre e de novo) sobre como fazer convergir prática pedagógica e projeto formativo humanizador
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1