信号、生产力和投资

Anastasios Dosis
{"title":"信号、生产力和投资","authors":"Anastasios Dosis","doi":"10.1628/JITE-2019-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional wisdom argues that investment, output and welfare are all increasing in productivity. In this article, I show that this argument is not always correct. In particular, I study a simple model of a credit market with cashless, privately informed entrepreneurs who borrow from wealthy investors. Unlike related studies of credit markets with asymmetric information, I allow entrepreneurs to vary the scale of investment and hence, potentially, signal their type. Signalling crucially depends on the marginal productivity of investment of each type. Surprisingly, I show that aggregate investment and welfare might decrease in productivity. In some cases, an increase in productivity boosts investment but dampens welfare, as part of this increase arises from the attempt of high-type entrepreneurs to signal their type.","PeriodicalId":46932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Signalling, Productivity, and Investment\",\"authors\":\"Anastasios Dosis\",\"doi\":\"10.1628/JITE-2019-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventional wisdom argues that investment, output and welfare are all increasing in productivity. In this article, I show that this argument is not always correct. In particular, I study a simple model of a credit market with cashless, privately informed entrepreneurs who borrow from wealthy investors. Unlike related studies of credit markets with asymmetric information, I allow entrepreneurs to vary the scale of investment and hence, potentially, signal their type. Signalling crucially depends on the marginal productivity of investment of each type. Surprisingly, I show that aggregate investment and welfare might decrease in productivity. In some cases, an increase in productivity boosts investment but dampens welfare, as part of this increase arises from the attempt of high-type entrepreneurs to signal their type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1628/JITE-2019-0028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1628/JITE-2019-0028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

传统观点认为,投资、产出和福利都在提高生产率。在本文中,我将说明这种说法并不总是正确的。特别是,我研究了一个简单的信贷市场模型,其中有无现金、私下知情的企业家,他们从富有的投资者那里借钱。与对信息不对称的信贷市场的相关研究不同,我允许企业家改变投资规模,从而潜在地表明他们的类型。信号在很大程度上取决于每种类型投资的边际生产率。令人惊讶的是,我证明了总投资和福利可能会降低生产率。在某些情况下,生产率的提高促进了投资,但抑制了福利,因为这种增长的部分原因是高类型企业家试图表明他们的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Signalling, Productivity, and Investment
Conventional wisdom argues that investment, output and welfare are all increasing in productivity. In this article, I show that this argument is not always correct. In particular, I study a simple model of a credit market with cashless, privately informed entrepreneurs who borrow from wealthy investors. Unlike related studies of credit markets with asymmetric information, I allow entrepreneurs to vary the scale of investment and hence, potentially, signal their type. Signalling crucially depends on the marginal productivity of investment of each type. Surprisingly, I show that aggregate investment and welfare might decrease in productivity. In some cases, an increase in productivity boosts investment but dampens welfare, as part of this increase arises from the attempt of high-type entrepreneurs to signal their type.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Learning the Law Together: Judges, Litigants, and Case-by-Case Adjudication Learning the Law Together: Judges, Litigants, and Case-by-Case Adjudication Bias in Choice of Law: New Empirical and Experimental Evidence Plaintiff Favoritism in Judicial Cost-Shifting Decisions Is Choice of Law Biased? How Would we Know?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1