宗教信仰的经济理论与法律的产生

Metin M. Coşgel, Thomas J. Miceli
{"title":"宗教信仰的经济理论与法律的产生","authors":"Metin M. Coşgel, Thomas J. Miceli","doi":"10.1628/JITE-2019-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the interaction between religion and law as alternative mechanisms for controlling behavior. The model involves a prisoners' dilemma game played by randomly paired members of society. Religious believers cooperate reflexively, but are subject to exploitation by nonbelievers. Law enforcement emerges when the gain to believers from deterrence of nonbelievers exceeds enforcement costs. The results show that some minimal amount of religious belief is a prerequisite for law to emerge, but a high level of belief precludes its emergence. Thus, religion is both a complement and substitute for law. We present empirical evidence to support the argument.","PeriodicalId":46932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward an Economic Theory of Religious Belief and the Emergence of Law\",\"authors\":\"Metin M. Coşgel, Thomas J. Miceli\",\"doi\":\"10.1628/JITE-2019-0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the interaction between religion and law as alternative mechanisms for controlling behavior. The model involves a prisoners' dilemma game played by randomly paired members of society. Religious believers cooperate reflexively, but are subject to exploitation by nonbelievers. Law enforcement emerges when the gain to believers from deterrence of nonbelievers exceeds enforcement costs. The results show that some minimal amount of religious belief is a prerequisite for law to emerge, but a high level of belief precludes its emergence. Thus, religion is both a complement and substitute for law. We present empirical evidence to support the argument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1628/JITE-2019-0035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1628/JITE-2019-0035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文探讨了宗教与法律之间的相互作用作为控制行为的替代机制。该模型涉及一个囚徒困境游戏,由随机配对的社会成员参与。宗教信仰者会本能地合作,但却会受到非信仰者的剥削。当信徒从威慑非信徒中获得的收益超过执法成本时,执法就出现了。结果表明,少量的宗教信仰是法律产生的先决条件,但高度的信仰则会阻碍法律的产生。因此,宗教既是法律的补充,又是法律的替代。我们提出经验证据来支持这一论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward an Economic Theory of Religious Belief and the Emergence of Law
This paper examines the interaction between religion and law as alternative mechanisms for controlling behavior. The model involves a prisoners' dilemma game played by randomly paired members of society. Religious believers cooperate reflexively, but are subject to exploitation by nonbelievers. Law enforcement emerges when the gain to believers from deterrence of nonbelievers exceeds enforcement costs. The results show that some minimal amount of religious belief is a prerequisite for law to emerge, but a high level of belief precludes its emergence. Thus, religion is both a complement and substitute for law. We present empirical evidence to support the argument.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Learning the Law Together: Judges, Litigants, and Case-by-Case Adjudication Learning the Law Together: Judges, Litigants, and Case-by-Case Adjudication Bias in Choice of Law: New Empirical and Experimental Evidence Plaintiff Favoritism in Judicial Cost-Shifting Decisions Is Choice of Law Biased? How Would we Know?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1