促进国际竞争执法程序规范

R. Alford
{"title":"促进国际竞争执法程序规范","authors":"R. Alford","doi":"10.17161/1808.30532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a pleasure to participate in the 2019 Kansas Law Review Symposium, “Antitrust Law and Policy in the 21st Century.” Antitrust is once again a hot topic and discussion about how to effectively enforce the laws in a digital age is generating widespread attention. My focus will be on the topic of promoting fundamental due process in competition law investigation and enforcement. With competition authorities around the globe becoming increasingly more active, it is one of the most important topics on the antitrust agenda. And this year, we witnessed a watershed moment with the adoption of a new framework protecting due process. The International Competition Network (ICN) unveiled the Framework on Competition Agency Procedures (CAP) in May 2019 to promote fundamental due process in competition investigation.1 As of August 2019, there were seventy-two signatories to the CAP, reflecting almost every leading competition authority.2 It was the first time in history that competition authorities from around the world entered into a multilateral framework on due process that included core due process protections and meaningful review mechanisms. It was, as United States Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim noted, “a remarkable and historic achievement for antitrust enforcement” that combines “strong substantive principles with meaningful review mechanisms” that “goes well beyond anything competition agencies have ever done before.”3","PeriodicalId":83417,"journal":{"name":"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\",,,Promoting International Procedural Norms in Competition Law Enforcement\",\"authors\":\"R. Alford\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/1808.30532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is a pleasure to participate in the 2019 Kansas Law Review Symposium, “Antitrust Law and Policy in the 21st Century.” Antitrust is once again a hot topic and discussion about how to effectively enforce the laws in a digital age is generating widespread attention. My focus will be on the topic of promoting fundamental due process in competition law investigation and enforcement. With competition authorities around the globe becoming increasingly more active, it is one of the most important topics on the antitrust agenda. And this year, we witnessed a watershed moment with the adoption of a new framework protecting due process. The International Competition Network (ICN) unveiled the Framework on Competition Agency Procedures (CAP) in May 2019 to promote fundamental due process in competition investigation.1 As of August 2019, there were seventy-two signatories to the CAP, reflecting almost every leading competition authority.2 It was the first time in history that competition authorities from around the world entered into a multilateral framework on due process that included core due process protections and meaningful review mechanisms. It was, as United States Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim noted, “a remarkable and historic achievement for antitrust enforcement” that combines “strong substantive principles with meaningful review mechanisms” that “goes well beyond anything competition agencies have ever done before.”3\",\"PeriodicalId\":83417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/1808.30532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Kansas law review. University of Kansas. School of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/1808.30532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很高兴参加2019年堪萨斯法律评论研讨会,“21世纪的反垄断法和政策”。反垄断再次成为热门话题,关于如何在数字时代有效执法的讨论引起了广泛关注。我的重点将是促进竞争法调查和执法的基本正当程序。随着全球竞争监管机构变得越来越活跃,这已成为反垄断议程上最重要的话题之一。今年,我们见证了保护正当程序的新框架获得通过的分水岭时刻。国际竞争网络(ICN)于2019年5月公布了《竞争机构程序框架》(CAP),以促进竞争调查中的基本正当程序截至2019年8月,CAP共有72个签署国,几乎反映了所有主要的竞争监管机构这是历史上第一次,世界各地的竞争主管机构进入了一个包括核心正当程序保护和有意义的审查机制的多边框架。正如美国助理司法部长Makan Delrahim所指出的那样,这是“反垄断执法方面的一项非凡的历史性成就”,它将“强有力的实质性原则与有意义的审查机制”结合在一起,“远远超过了竞争机构以前所做的任何事情”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
,,,Promoting International Procedural Norms in Competition Law Enforcement
It is a pleasure to participate in the 2019 Kansas Law Review Symposium, “Antitrust Law and Policy in the 21st Century.” Antitrust is once again a hot topic and discussion about how to effectively enforce the laws in a digital age is generating widespread attention. My focus will be on the topic of promoting fundamental due process in competition law investigation and enforcement. With competition authorities around the globe becoming increasingly more active, it is one of the most important topics on the antitrust agenda. And this year, we witnessed a watershed moment with the adoption of a new framework protecting due process. The International Competition Network (ICN) unveiled the Framework on Competition Agency Procedures (CAP) in May 2019 to promote fundamental due process in competition investigation.1 As of August 2019, there were seventy-two signatories to the CAP, reflecting almost every leading competition authority.2 It was the first time in history that competition authorities from around the world entered into a multilateral framework on due process that included core due process protections and meaningful review mechanisms. It was, as United States Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim noted, “a remarkable and historic achievement for antitrust enforcement” that combines “strong substantive principles with meaningful review mechanisms” that “goes well beyond anything competition agencies have ever done before.”3
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
,,,Toxic Secrecy: Non-Disclosure Agreements and #MeToo ,,,Dressing for Success: Lawyers & Clothing in Nineteenth Century America ,,,Lawyers for White People? ,,,Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination Claims Under the Fair Housing Act After Bostock v. Clayton County ,,,Getting It Right Isn’t Enough: The Appellate Court’s Role in Procedural Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1