美国自然哲学的安魂曲

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Ecology Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.15779/Z38PG1HN8P
A. K. Athens
{"title":"美国自然哲学的安魂曲","authors":"A. K. Athens","doi":"10.15779/Z38PG1HN8P","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of nature as a stable and predictable counterpoint to the disruptive energy and change of human societies is at the heart of one of the most enduring environmental writing traditions, the pastoral.1 Moreover, a related rhetorical convention, the pastoral elegy, distinguishes the nature writing and environmental philosophy of postcolonial settler societies “marked by the death and/or dispossession of their original inhabitants.”2 In his fifth book, After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene,3 Duke Law Professor Jedediah Purdy invokes the pastoral mode as he meditates on the uneasy inheritance of early American approaches to nature and politics. As a pastoral elegy inquiring into environmental change and loss, Purdy’s book incorporates facets of different types of critical environmental analysis. However, it is not an environmental activist’s handbook,4 a treatise on environmental justice and the politics of environmental racism in the United States,5 a casebook of American environmental law and policy,6 or a complex philosophical study of how the “objective” use of nature most often leads to oppressive social and gender divisions.7 Rather, Purdy traces the historical lineage of our present moment in the ultimate expression of human disruption, the Anthropocene, through a historical classification of American attitudes towards nature.8 The Anthropocene is a recent, albeit contested, designation that marks the indelible human imprint on the world.9 In Part I, this Review briefly discusses Purdy’s categorization of the founding principles of early","PeriodicalId":45532,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Law Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Requiem for American NaturePhilosophy\",\"authors\":\"A. K. Athens\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38PG1HN8P\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The idea of nature as a stable and predictable counterpoint to the disruptive energy and change of human societies is at the heart of one of the most enduring environmental writing traditions, the pastoral.1 Moreover, a related rhetorical convention, the pastoral elegy, distinguishes the nature writing and environmental philosophy of postcolonial settler societies “marked by the death and/or dispossession of their original inhabitants.”2 In his fifth book, After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene,3 Duke Law Professor Jedediah Purdy invokes the pastoral mode as he meditates on the uneasy inheritance of early American approaches to nature and politics. As a pastoral elegy inquiring into environmental change and loss, Purdy’s book incorporates facets of different types of critical environmental analysis. However, it is not an environmental activist’s handbook,4 a treatise on environmental justice and the politics of environmental racism in the United States,5 a casebook of American environmental law and policy,6 or a complex philosophical study of how the “objective” use of nature most often leads to oppressive social and gender divisions.7 Rather, Purdy traces the historical lineage of our present moment in the ultimate expression of human disruption, the Anthropocene, through a historical classification of American attitudes towards nature.8 The Anthropocene is a recent, albeit contested, designation that marks the indelible human imprint on the world.9 In Part I, this Review briefly discusses Purdy’s categorization of the founding principles of early\",\"PeriodicalId\":45532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Law Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Law Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38PG1HN8P\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Law Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38PG1HN8P","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将自然作为人类社会的破坏性能量和变化的稳定和可预测的对应物的想法,是最持久的环境写作传统之一——牧歌的核心此外,一种相关的修辞惯例,田园挽歌,区分了自然写作和环境哲学的后殖民定居者社会,其标志是其原始居民的死亡和/或剥夺。在他的第五本书《自然之后:人类世的政治》中,杜克大学法学教授杰迪戴亚·珀迪在思考早期美国人对待自然和政治的方式的不安继承时,引用了田园模式。作为一首探究环境变化和损失的田园挽歌,珀迪的书融合了不同类型的批判性环境分析。然而,它不是一本环境活动家的手册,不是一本关于美国环境正义和环境种族主义政治的专著,不是一本关于美国环境法律和政策的案例手册,也不是一本关于自然的“客观”利用如何经常导致压迫性的社会和性别分化的复杂哲学研究相反,珀迪通过对美国人对待自然态度的历史分类,追溯了人类破坏的最终表现——人类世——在我们当前时刻的历史谱系人类世是最近才提出的,尽管存在争议,但它标志着人类在世界上留下了不可磨灭的印记在第一部分中,本文简要地讨论了珀迪对早期的创始原则的分类
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Requiem for American NaturePhilosophy
The idea of nature as a stable and predictable counterpoint to the disruptive energy and change of human societies is at the heart of one of the most enduring environmental writing traditions, the pastoral.1 Moreover, a related rhetorical convention, the pastoral elegy, distinguishes the nature writing and environmental philosophy of postcolonial settler societies “marked by the death and/or dispossession of their original inhabitants.”2 In his fifth book, After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene,3 Duke Law Professor Jedediah Purdy invokes the pastoral mode as he meditates on the uneasy inheritance of early American approaches to nature and politics. As a pastoral elegy inquiring into environmental change and loss, Purdy’s book incorporates facets of different types of critical environmental analysis. However, it is not an environmental activist’s handbook,4 a treatise on environmental justice and the politics of environmental racism in the United States,5 a casebook of American environmental law and policy,6 or a complex philosophical study of how the “objective” use of nature most often leads to oppressive social and gender divisions.7 Rather, Purdy traces the historical lineage of our present moment in the ultimate expression of human disruption, the Anthropocene, through a historical classification of American attitudes towards nature.8 The Anthropocene is a recent, albeit contested, designation that marks the indelible human imprint on the world.9 In Part I, this Review briefly discusses Purdy’s categorization of the founding principles of early
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecology Law Quarterly"s primary function is to produce two high quality journals: a quarterly print version and a more frequent, cutting-edge online journal, Ecology Law Currents. UC Berkeley School of Law students manage every aspect of ELQ, from communicating with authors to editing articles to publishing the journals. In addition to featuring work by leading environmental law scholars, ELQ encourages student writing and publishes student pieces.
期刊最新文献
Finding Elegance in Unexpected Places Carbon Dioxide Removal after Paris Vindicating Public Environmental Interest: Defining the Role of Enviornmental Public Interest Litigation in China Opening Reflection: The Elegance of International Law Navigating the Judicialization of International Law in Troubled Waters: Some Reflections on a Generation of International Lawyers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1