设计的可持续性:kenosis作为环境、文化和社会对话的框架

RS Lindstrom
{"title":"设计的可持续性:kenosis作为环境、文化和社会对话的框架","authors":"RS Lindstrom","doi":"10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/V09I01/55397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than a decade ago, Simon Guy and Graham Farmer named the environment as \"contested terrain,\" categorised the debated logics, acknowledged the legitimacy of interpretive differences, and called for a framework by which a plurality of voices might be heard, and a transformational process – toward \"a very different dialogue about sustainable architecture\" – might be effected. The sustainability conversation continues, as do the debates and differences, raising questions as to how \"very different\" the dialogue has become, and whether there remains a vacancy of communication and understanding that another framework might help to fill. This paper turns to the Christian theology of kenosis, and parallel concepts in other world religions, in order to reveal and posit a cross-cultural construct that, arguably, offers the potential for transformation of inter-logic engagement, as Guy and Farmer espoused. Kenosis is explored, however, not as a religious proposal or universal prescription, but as a flexible tool for encouraging hermeneutic discourse in a pluralistic society, and for fostering attitudinal change amongst designers, ‘development actors’, and all who participate in, or are affected by, the design of the built environment and its promise of sustainability. The work of Manuel Doncel in the field of kenotic creation and cosmobioevolution, coupled with Steve Odin’s interfaith exploration of kenosis, provides an informative point of origin. Thereafter, the potential of kenosis is examined against the writings of philosopher Walter Benjamin and architect Paolo Soleri, each providing extraordinary critiques of the modern metropolis and strong views of the relationship between humankind and nature, but from significantly diverse perspectives. The juxtaposition of their work, and its extension to current and future contexts, more fully opens up the global potential of a kenotic approach to environmental, cultural and social sustainability by design.","PeriodicalId":38204,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability by design: kenosis as a framework for environmental, cultural, and social dialogue\",\"authors\":\"RS Lindstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/V09I01/55397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"More than a decade ago, Simon Guy and Graham Farmer named the environment as \\\"contested terrain,\\\" categorised the debated logics, acknowledged the legitimacy of interpretive differences, and called for a framework by which a plurality of voices might be heard, and a transformational process – toward \\\"a very different dialogue about sustainable architecture\\\" – might be effected. The sustainability conversation continues, as do the debates and differences, raising questions as to how \\\"very different\\\" the dialogue has become, and whether there remains a vacancy of communication and understanding that another framework might help to fill. This paper turns to the Christian theology of kenosis, and parallel concepts in other world religions, in order to reveal and posit a cross-cultural construct that, arguably, offers the potential for transformation of inter-logic engagement, as Guy and Farmer espoused. Kenosis is explored, however, not as a religious proposal or universal prescription, but as a flexible tool for encouraging hermeneutic discourse in a pluralistic society, and for fostering attitudinal change amongst designers, ‘development actors’, and all who participate in, or are affected by, the design of the built environment and its promise of sustainability. The work of Manuel Doncel in the field of kenotic creation and cosmobioevolution, coupled with Steve Odin’s interfaith exploration of kenosis, provides an informative point of origin. Thereafter, the potential of kenosis is examined against the writings of philosopher Walter Benjamin and architect Paolo Soleri, each providing extraordinary critiques of the modern metropolis and strong views of the relationship between humankind and nature, but from significantly diverse perspectives. The juxtaposition of their work, and its extension to current and future contexts, more fully opens up the global potential of a kenotic approach to environmental, cultural and social sustainability by design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/V09I01/55397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/V09I01/55397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

十多年前,西蒙·盖伊和格雷厄姆·法默将环境称为“有争议的领域”,对争论的逻辑进行了分类,承认了解释差异的合法性,并呼吁建立一个框架,通过这个框架,可以听到多种声音,并可能实现一个转型过程——朝着“关于可持续建筑的非常不同的对话”。关于可持续发展的对话仍在继续,辩论和分歧也在继续,提出了一些问题,如对话已经变得多么“非常不同”,以及是否仍然存在沟通和理解的空缺,另一个框架可能有助于填补。本文转向基督教的克诺西神学,以及其他世界宗教中的类似概念,以揭示和假设一种跨文化结构,可以说,正如盖伊和法默所支持的那样,这种跨文化结构为内部逻辑参与的转变提供了潜力。然而,Kenosis不是作为一种宗教建议或普遍的处方来探索,而是作为一种灵活的工具来鼓励多元社会中的解释性话语,并促进设计师,“发展参与者”以及所有参与或受建筑环境设计及其可持续性承诺影响的人之间的态度变化。曼纽尔·唐塞尔在kenosis创造和宇宙生物进化领域的工作,加上史蒂夫·奥丁对kenosis的跨信仰探索,提供了一个信息来源。此后,kenosis的潜力与哲学家Walter Benjamin和建筑师Paolo Soleri的著作进行了对比,他们都对现代大都市提出了非凡的批评,并从不同的角度对人与自然之间的关系提出了强烈的看法。他们的作品并置,并将其扩展到当前和未来的环境中,更充分地打开了通过设计实现环境、文化和社会可持续性的kenotic方法的全球潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability by design: kenosis as a framework for environmental, cultural, and social dialogue
More than a decade ago, Simon Guy and Graham Farmer named the environment as "contested terrain," categorised the debated logics, acknowledged the legitimacy of interpretive differences, and called for a framework by which a plurality of voices might be heard, and a transformational process – toward "a very different dialogue about sustainable architecture" – might be effected. The sustainability conversation continues, as do the debates and differences, raising questions as to how "very different" the dialogue has become, and whether there remains a vacancy of communication and understanding that another framework might help to fill. This paper turns to the Christian theology of kenosis, and parallel concepts in other world religions, in order to reveal and posit a cross-cultural construct that, arguably, offers the potential for transformation of inter-logic engagement, as Guy and Farmer espoused. Kenosis is explored, however, not as a religious proposal or universal prescription, but as a flexible tool for encouraging hermeneutic discourse in a pluralistic society, and for fostering attitudinal change amongst designers, ‘development actors’, and all who participate in, or are affected by, the design of the built environment and its promise of sustainability. The work of Manuel Doncel in the field of kenotic creation and cosmobioevolution, coupled with Steve Odin’s interfaith exploration of kenosis, provides an informative point of origin. Thereafter, the potential of kenosis is examined against the writings of philosopher Walter Benjamin and architect Paolo Soleri, each providing extraordinary critiques of the modern metropolis and strong views of the relationship between humankind and nature, but from significantly diverse perspectives. The juxtaposition of their work, and its extension to current and future contexts, more fully opens up the global potential of a kenotic approach to environmental, cultural and social sustainability by design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice
International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Simultaneous Adoption of Sustainable Land Management Practices under a Changing Climate in Côte d'Ivoire Eco-Dogmatism: Nature’s Values and Rights in High-Level Environmental Governance Initiatives Power in Policymaking: Origin and Influence Problem-Based Learning, Social Sustainability, and Soccer as a Comprehensive Strategy for Reaching Out to Vulnerable Communities in Pandemic Times: A Case Study in Monterrey, Mexico A Case Study on the Blended Reporting Phenomenon: A Comparative Analysis of Voluntary Reporting Frameworks and Standards—GRI, IR, SASB, and CDP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1