发展援助的反身性

M. Karlsson, Masaru Yarime
{"title":"发展援助的反身性","authors":"M. Karlsson, Masaru Yarime","doi":"10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v10i01/55442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© Common Ground, Martin Karlsson and Marasu Yarime, All Rights ReservedThe concept of reflexivity has been brought forward as a key component of sustainability science and sustainability governance, being indispensable for sustainability as a process and a goal. The reflexive governance research field has started to produce some insight into what reflexivity could mean in practice when brought out from the hallowed halls of science into the messy arena of governance, but so far attention has been focused on First-World cases. This paper will explore how reflexive governance relates to the reflexivity concept, and how it can be applied within Official Development Assistance (ODA), especially in ODA evaluations. Two main obstacles to reflexive knowledge production in ODA are identified, being the duality of accountability in ODA and the resulting knowledge incentives, and the asymmetry in communicative capacity. Lastly recommendations are made to address these obstacles, so that evaluations can assist in achieving sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":38204,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"17-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflexivity in Development Assistance\",\"authors\":\"M. Karlsson, Masaru Yarime\",\"doi\":\"10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v10i01/55442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"© Common Ground, Martin Karlsson and Marasu Yarime, All Rights ReservedThe concept of reflexivity has been brought forward as a key component of sustainability science and sustainability governance, being indispensable for sustainability as a process and a goal. The reflexive governance research field has started to produce some insight into what reflexivity could mean in practice when brought out from the hallowed halls of science into the messy arena of governance, but so far attention has been focused on First-World cases. This paper will explore how reflexive governance relates to the reflexivity concept, and how it can be applied within Official Development Assistance (ODA), especially in ODA evaluations. Two main obstacles to reflexive knowledge production in ODA are identified, being the duality of accountability in ODA and the resulting knowledge incentives, and the asymmetry in communicative capacity. Lastly recommendations are made to address these obstacles, so that evaluations can assist in achieving sustainable development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"17-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v10i01/55442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1166/CGP/v10i01/55442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

©Common Ground, Martin Karlsson和Marasu Yarime,版权所有反思性的概念已经被提出,作为可持续发展科学和可持续发展治理的关键组成部分,对于可持续发展作为一个过程和目标是不可或缺的。反思性治理研究领域已经开始对反思性在实践中意味着什么产生一些见解,当从神圣的科学殿堂带到混乱的治理舞台时,但到目前为止,注意力一直集中在第一世界的案例上。本文将探讨反身性治理与反身性概念的关系,以及如何将其应用于官方发展援助(ODA),特别是在ODA评估中。确定了官方发展援助中反思性知识生产的两个主要障碍,即官方发展援助中的问责制和由此产生的知识激励的双重性,以及沟通能力的不对称。最后,提出了解决这些障碍的建议,以便评价能够协助实现可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reflexivity in Development Assistance
© Common Ground, Martin Karlsson and Marasu Yarime, All Rights ReservedThe concept of reflexivity has been brought forward as a key component of sustainability science and sustainability governance, being indispensable for sustainability as a process and a goal. The reflexive governance research field has started to produce some insight into what reflexivity could mean in practice when brought out from the hallowed halls of science into the messy arena of governance, but so far attention has been focused on First-World cases. This paper will explore how reflexive governance relates to the reflexivity concept, and how it can be applied within Official Development Assistance (ODA), especially in ODA evaluations. Two main obstacles to reflexive knowledge production in ODA are identified, being the duality of accountability in ODA and the resulting knowledge incentives, and the asymmetry in communicative capacity. Lastly recommendations are made to address these obstacles, so that evaluations can assist in achieving sustainable development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice
International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Simultaneous Adoption of Sustainable Land Management Practices under a Changing Climate in Côte d'Ivoire Eco-Dogmatism: Nature’s Values and Rights in High-Level Environmental Governance Initiatives Power in Policymaking: Origin and Influence Problem-Based Learning, Social Sustainability, and Soccer as a Comprehensive Strategy for Reaching Out to Vulnerable Communities in Pandemic Times: A Case Study in Monterrey, Mexico A Case Study on the Blended Reporting Phenomenon: A Comparative Analysis of Voluntary Reporting Frameworks and Standards—GRI, IR, SASB, and CDP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1