在感伤主义和规范科学的光照下,皮尔斯的开放社区

Jorge Alejandro Flórez, Juliana Acosta López de Mesa
{"title":"在感伤主义和规范科学的光照下,皮尔斯的开放社区","authors":"Jorge Alejandro Flórez, Juliana Acosta López de Mesa","doi":"10.17533/udea.ef.347278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\n\nPeirce’s idea of an unlimited community has been usually analyzed from its role in science and the normative ideal of truth. However, it is essential to understand the role of the community of inquiry in light of the other normative sciences, aesthetics and ethics, since according to Peirce, any endeavor to know that is not guided by the esthetical ideal of admirable per se should not be considered as proper science, but as a power tool to benefit some elite. This article aims to analyze Peirce’s idea of community of inquiry in light of sentimentalism and the normative sciences in order to evidence that such community is not elitist, but open, insofar as it is also lured by the summum bonum and the admirable per se. Finally, we provide a more organic reading of Peirce’s work, opening the way to consider possible consequences of this position from an ethical and political perspective.\n\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":32344,"journal":{"name":"Estudios de Filosofia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peirce’s open community in light of sentimentalism and normative sciences\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Alejandro Flórez, Juliana Acosta López de Mesa\",\"doi\":\"10.17533/udea.ef.347278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n\\n\\nPeirce’s idea of an unlimited community has been usually analyzed from its role in science and the normative ideal of truth. However, it is essential to understand the role of the community of inquiry in light of the other normative sciences, aesthetics and ethics, since according to Peirce, any endeavor to know that is not guided by the esthetical ideal of admirable per se should not be considered as proper science, but as a power tool to benefit some elite. This article aims to analyze Peirce’s idea of community of inquiry in light of sentimentalism and the normative sciences in order to evidence that such community is not elitist, but open, insofar as it is also lured by the summum bonum and the admirable per se. Finally, we provide a more organic reading of Peirce’s work, opening the way to consider possible consequences of this position from an ethical and political perspective.\\n\\n\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":32344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios de Filosofia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios de Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.347278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.347278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

皮尔斯的无限共同体思想通常是从它在科学中的作用和真理的规范理想来分析的。然而,根据其他规范科学,美学和伦理学,理解探究共同体的作用是至关重要的,因为根据皮尔斯的说法,任何不受令人钦佩的美学理想指导的了解努力都不应被视为适当的科学,而应被视为有利于某些精英的权力工具。本文旨在从感性主义和规范科学的角度分析皮尔斯的探究共同体思想,以证明这种共同体不是精英主义的,而是开放的,因为它也被至善和令人钦佩的本身所吸引。最后,我们提供了一个更有机的阅读皮尔斯的作品,打开了从伦理和政治的角度考虑这种立场的可能后果的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peirce’s open community in light of sentimentalism and normative sciences
Peirce’s idea of an unlimited community has been usually analyzed from its role in science and the normative ideal of truth. However, it is essential to understand the role of the community of inquiry in light of the other normative sciences, aesthetics and ethics, since according to Peirce, any endeavor to know that is not guided by the esthetical ideal of admirable per se should not be considered as proper science, but as a power tool to benefit some elite. This article aims to analyze Peirce’s idea of community of inquiry in light of sentimentalism and the normative sciences in order to evidence that such community is not elitist, but open, insofar as it is also lured by the summum bonum and the admirable per se. Finally, we provide a more organic reading of Peirce’s work, opening the way to consider possible consequences of this position from an ethical and political perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Las ilusiones de la multitud” o “imaginarios” y sus efectos el ámbito político, en la filosofía de Baruch Spinoza Benjaminian Reminiscences in Deleuze’s and Daney’s Dialogue about Images in Control Societies Acerca del conocimiento, uso y vivencia de la historia El arte y el artista modernos en Hegel La violencia en Cahiers pour une morale de Jean-Paul Sartre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1