巴西南部某都市区域可持续发展视角下交通方式的比较分析

Q3 Engineering Production Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6513.20190038
L. Lerman, Amália Koefender, G. B. Benitez, Mateus José do Rêgo Ferreira Lima, A. G. Frank
{"title":"巴西南部某都市区域可持续发展视角下交通方式的比较分析","authors":"L. Lerman, Amália Koefender, G. B. Benitez, Mateus José do Rêgo Ferreira Lima, A. G. Frank","doi":"10.1590/0103-6513.20190038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Columbus, Ohio, United States *guilherme.benitez@hotmail.com Abstract Paper aims: The objective is to make a comparative analysis between different transportation modes used in the Metropolitan Region of Porto Alegre and to analyze its performance in relation to time, cost and carbon emissions. Originality: Investigation of the urban mobility situation on the perspective of sustainability in a Latin American city, including the analysis of Uber pool, implemented in November 2018 in the metropolitan region analyzed. Research method : A case study was carried out in the metropolitan area of Porto Alegre, as well as the definition of 4 different routes used as unit of analysis for different types of transportation modes. Main findings: Riding bicycle is a very convenient transportation mode in terms of its environmental perspectives and costs. However, the time of locomotion using bicycle is superior in relation to other modes of transportation. Therefore, riding a private car still stands out in the comparisons between different types of transport, since it is a faster mode of transportation. Implications for theory and practice: As riding bicycle is a very convenient transportation mode, we highlight the importance of encouraging its use. People can benefit from practicing physical exercise while moving from one place to another and also benefit the","PeriodicalId":34960,"journal":{"name":"Production","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis between transportation modes for sustainability perspective in one metropolitan region of southern Brazil\",\"authors\":\"L. Lerman, Amália Koefender, G. B. Benitez, Mateus José do Rêgo Ferreira Lima, A. G. Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6513.20190038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Columbus, Ohio, United States *guilherme.benitez@hotmail.com Abstract Paper aims: The objective is to make a comparative analysis between different transportation modes used in the Metropolitan Region of Porto Alegre and to analyze its performance in relation to time, cost and carbon emissions. Originality: Investigation of the urban mobility situation on the perspective of sustainability in a Latin American city, including the analysis of Uber pool, implemented in November 2018 in the metropolitan region analyzed. Research method : A case study was carried out in the metropolitan area of Porto Alegre, as well as the definition of 4 different routes used as unit of analysis for different types of transportation modes. Main findings: Riding bicycle is a very convenient transportation mode in terms of its environmental perspectives and costs. However, the time of locomotion using bicycle is superior in relation to other modes of transportation. Therefore, riding a private car still stands out in the comparisons between different types of transport, since it is a faster mode of transportation. Implications for theory and practice: As riding bicycle is a very convenient transportation mode, we highlight the importance of encouraging its use. People can benefit from practicing physical exercise while moving from one place to another and also benefit the\",\"PeriodicalId\":34960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Production\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20190038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20190038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要论文目的:目的是对阿雷格里港大都会区使用的不同交通方式进行比较分析,并分析其在时间、成本和碳排放方面的表现。独创性:从可持续发展的角度对拉丁美洲某城市的城市交通状况进行调查,包括对2018年11月在大都市地区实施的优步拼车的分析。研究方法:以阿雷格里港大都市区为例,定义4条不同的路线作为分析单元,针对不同类型的交通方式进行分析。主要发现:从环境角度和成本角度来看,骑自行车是一种非常方便的交通方式。然而,与其他交通方式相比,使用自行车的运动时间是优越的。因此,乘坐私家车在不同类型的交通工具之间的比较中仍然很突出,因为它是一种更快的交通方式。理论与实践启示:由于骑自行车是一种非常方便的交通方式,我们强调鼓励使用自行车的重要性。人们可以从从一个地方到另一个地方的运动中受益,也有益于身体健康
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis between transportation modes for sustainability perspective in one metropolitan region of southern Brazil
Columbus, Ohio, United States *guilherme.benitez@hotmail.com Abstract Paper aims: The objective is to make a comparative analysis between different transportation modes used in the Metropolitan Region of Porto Alegre and to analyze its performance in relation to time, cost and carbon emissions. Originality: Investigation of the urban mobility situation on the perspective of sustainability in a Latin American city, including the analysis of Uber pool, implemented in November 2018 in the metropolitan region analyzed. Research method : A case study was carried out in the metropolitan area of Porto Alegre, as well as the definition of 4 different routes used as unit of analysis for different types of transportation modes. Main findings: Riding bicycle is a very convenient transportation mode in terms of its environmental perspectives and costs. However, the time of locomotion using bicycle is superior in relation to other modes of transportation. Therefore, riding a private car still stands out in the comparisons between different types of transport, since it is a faster mode of transportation. Implications for theory and practice: As riding bicycle is a very convenient transportation mode, we highlight the importance of encouraging its use. People can benefit from practicing physical exercise while moving from one place to another and also benefit the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Production
Production Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The Produção Journal (Production Journal), ISSN 0103-6513, is a Brazilian Association of Production Engineering (ABEPRO) publication. It was created in 1990 in order to provide a communication medium for academic articles in the Production Engineering field. Since 2002, the Production Engineering Department of Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (PRO/EPUSP) is responsible for the editorial process of Produção Journal, sponsored by Carlos Alberto Vanzolini Foundation (FCAV). Revista Produção has the tradition of eighteen published volumes and Qualis "B2" evaluation by CAPES in the Engineering III area. For Brazilian academic community it is a top journal in Production Engineering field.
期刊最新文献
Toward the development of a Preparedness and Response Protocol for epidemics and pandemics Healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs: an empirical study using PLS-SEM Social Network Analysis in disaster management Action research supported by remote collaboration tools: analysis of two operations management applications Multicriteria negotiation model for selecting sustainable suppliers’ problem in the agribusiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1