公共交通质量的多变量分析:以巴西某中型城市为例

Q3 Engineering Production Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6513.20210117
M. L. Oliveira, Laryssa de Andrade Mairinque, Júlia Barros dos Santos, J. Lima
{"title":"公共交通质量的多变量分析:以巴西某中型城市为例","authors":"M. L. Oliveira, Laryssa de Andrade Mairinque, Júlia Barros dos Santos, J. Lima","doi":"10.1590/0103-6513.20210117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper aims: This study aimed to analyze how the satisfaction level of public transport (PT) users is influenced by their socioeconomic characteristics. Originality: The analysis of how socioeconomic variables influence the satisfaction level through the association between MANOVA and exploratory analysis is still not explored, especially in Brazil and in medium-sized cities, which represent the majority of Brazilian cities. Research method: Data collection was carried out by questionnaire in a Brazilian city. The 330 users of PT evaluated their satisfaction level concerning 12 quality indicators. Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson’s correlation and MANOVA. Main findings: Most socioeconomic variables influenced user satisfaction in at least one indicator, gender and schooling being the most prominent. The results showed that women’s mean level of satisfaction is lower than men’s concerning indicators affected by gender. Fare was the indicator with the worst score, being influenced by users’ occupation. Implications for theory and practice: The study presents practical and methodological contributions. The results provides technical and scientific subsidies for public policies and service improvement. It possible to improve each indicator according to the users’ socioeconomic characteristics, encouraging the use of PT and contributing to the urban environment sustainability. The indicators accessibility, information, punctuality, public security, and frequency were used in more than 70% of the analyzed studies. Moreover, the indicators fare, travel time, crowding, stations characteristics, employee behavior, and comfort were also widely seen, in more than 40% of the articles. These findings are in agreement with De Oña & De Oña (2015), who demonstrated that there is no consensus about which quality indicators should be used and emphasized that this choice is highly dependent on the context. Despite this, the authors emphasize that the indicators frequency, punctuality, comfort, cleanliness of vehicles, safety, availability of information, courtesy of employees and fare are the most used. In this study, after evaluating the indicators that appeared in more than 40% of the articles reviewed, 12 most important indicators for the city under study were selected, according to previous research (Santos & Lima, 2021). All these works have contributed to the evaluation of the quality of PT; however, further studies to understand the determinants of demand and behavior of PT users are still needed since each case has different settings and characteristics in terms of environment, security, and","PeriodicalId":34960,"journal":{"name":"Production","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multivariate analysis of public transport quality: a case study in a medium-sized Brazilian city\",\"authors\":\"M. L. Oliveira, Laryssa de Andrade Mairinque, Júlia Barros dos Santos, J. Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6513.20210117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paper aims: This study aimed to analyze how the satisfaction level of public transport (PT) users is influenced by their socioeconomic characteristics. Originality: The analysis of how socioeconomic variables influence the satisfaction level through the association between MANOVA and exploratory analysis is still not explored, especially in Brazil and in medium-sized cities, which represent the majority of Brazilian cities. Research method: Data collection was carried out by questionnaire in a Brazilian city. The 330 users of PT evaluated their satisfaction level concerning 12 quality indicators. Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson’s correlation and MANOVA. Main findings: Most socioeconomic variables influenced user satisfaction in at least one indicator, gender and schooling being the most prominent. The results showed that women’s mean level of satisfaction is lower than men’s concerning indicators affected by gender. Fare was the indicator with the worst score, being influenced by users’ occupation. Implications for theory and practice: The study presents practical and methodological contributions. The results provides technical and scientific subsidies for public policies and service improvement. It possible to improve each indicator according to the users’ socioeconomic characteristics, encouraging the use of PT and contributing to the urban environment sustainability. The indicators accessibility, information, punctuality, public security, and frequency were used in more than 70% of the analyzed studies. Moreover, the indicators fare, travel time, crowding, stations characteristics, employee behavior, and comfort were also widely seen, in more than 40% of the articles. These findings are in agreement with De Oña & De Oña (2015), who demonstrated that there is no consensus about which quality indicators should be used and emphasized that this choice is highly dependent on the context. Despite this, the authors emphasize that the indicators frequency, punctuality, comfort, cleanliness of vehicles, safety, availability of information, courtesy of employees and fare are the most used. In this study, after evaluating the indicators that appeared in more than 40% of the articles reviewed, 12 most important indicators for the city under study were selected, according to previous research (Santos & Lima, 2021). All these works have contributed to the evaluation of the quality of PT; however, further studies to understand the determinants of demand and behavior of PT users are still needed since each case has different settings and characteristics in terms of environment, security, and\",\"PeriodicalId\":34960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Production\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

论文目的:本研究旨在分析公共交通使用者的社会经济特征对其满意度的影响。独创性:社会经济变量如何通过方差分析和探索性分析之间的关联影响满意度水平的分析仍然没有被探索,特别是在巴西和中等城市,这代表了巴西城市的大多数。研究方法:在巴西某城市采用问卷调查的方式进行数据收集。330名PT用户对12项质量指标的满意度进行了评估。采用Pearson相关和方差分析进行统计分析。主要发现:大多数社会经济变量至少在一个指标上影响用户满意度,性别和学校教育是最突出的。结果显示,受性别影响的相关指标中,女性的平均满意度低于男性。票价是得分最低的指标,受到用户职业的影响。对理论和实践的启示:本研究提出了实践和方法上的贡献。研究结果为公共政策和服务改进提供了技术和科学补贴。可以根据用户的社会经济特征改进每个指标,鼓励PT的使用,促进城市环境的可持续性。可达性、信息、准时性、公共安全、频率等指标在70%以上的分析研究中被使用。此外,在超过40%的文章中,票价、旅行时间、拥挤程度、车站特征、员工行为和舒适度等指标也被广泛看到。这些发现与De Oña和De Oña(2015)一致,他们证明应该使用哪些质量指标没有共识,并强调这种选择高度依赖于上下文。尽管如此,作者强调,频率、准点率、舒适性、车辆清洁度、安全性、信息可用性、员工礼貌和票价等指标是最常用的。在本研究中,根据之前的研究(Santos & Lima, 2021),在评估了超过40%的文章中出现的指标后,选择了12个最重要的研究城市指标。这些工作为PT质量的评价提供了依据;然而,由于每种情况在环境、安全和安全方面都有不同的设置和特征,因此仍然需要进一步研究以了解PT用户需求和行为的决定因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multivariate analysis of public transport quality: a case study in a medium-sized Brazilian city
Paper aims: This study aimed to analyze how the satisfaction level of public transport (PT) users is influenced by their socioeconomic characteristics. Originality: The analysis of how socioeconomic variables influence the satisfaction level through the association between MANOVA and exploratory analysis is still not explored, especially in Brazil and in medium-sized cities, which represent the majority of Brazilian cities. Research method: Data collection was carried out by questionnaire in a Brazilian city. The 330 users of PT evaluated their satisfaction level concerning 12 quality indicators. Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson’s correlation and MANOVA. Main findings: Most socioeconomic variables influenced user satisfaction in at least one indicator, gender and schooling being the most prominent. The results showed that women’s mean level of satisfaction is lower than men’s concerning indicators affected by gender. Fare was the indicator with the worst score, being influenced by users’ occupation. Implications for theory and practice: The study presents practical and methodological contributions. The results provides technical and scientific subsidies for public policies and service improvement. It possible to improve each indicator according to the users’ socioeconomic characteristics, encouraging the use of PT and contributing to the urban environment sustainability. The indicators accessibility, information, punctuality, public security, and frequency were used in more than 70% of the analyzed studies. Moreover, the indicators fare, travel time, crowding, stations characteristics, employee behavior, and comfort were also widely seen, in more than 40% of the articles. These findings are in agreement with De Oña & De Oña (2015), who demonstrated that there is no consensus about which quality indicators should be used and emphasized that this choice is highly dependent on the context. Despite this, the authors emphasize that the indicators frequency, punctuality, comfort, cleanliness of vehicles, safety, availability of information, courtesy of employees and fare are the most used. In this study, after evaluating the indicators that appeared in more than 40% of the articles reviewed, 12 most important indicators for the city under study were selected, according to previous research (Santos & Lima, 2021). All these works have contributed to the evaluation of the quality of PT; however, further studies to understand the determinants of demand and behavior of PT users are still needed since each case has different settings and characteristics in terms of environment, security, and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Production
Production Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The Produção Journal (Production Journal), ISSN 0103-6513, is a Brazilian Association of Production Engineering (ABEPRO) publication. It was created in 1990 in order to provide a communication medium for academic articles in the Production Engineering field. Since 2002, the Production Engineering Department of Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (PRO/EPUSP) is responsible for the editorial process of Produção Journal, sponsored by Carlos Alberto Vanzolini Foundation (FCAV). Revista Produção has the tradition of eighteen published volumes and Qualis "B2" evaluation by CAPES in the Engineering III area. For Brazilian academic community it is a top journal in Production Engineering field.
期刊最新文献
Toward the development of a Preparedness and Response Protocol for epidemics and pandemics Healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs: an empirical study using PLS-SEM Social Network Analysis in disaster management Action research supported by remote collaboration tools: analysis of two operations management applications Multicriteria negotiation model for selecting sustainable suppliers’ problem in the agribusiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1