医疗保健供应链风险评估kpi:使用PLS-SEM的实证研究

Q3 Engineering Production Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1590/0103-6513.20220107
Pedro P. Senna, A. Reis, J. Guimarães, Luís Marujo, Ana Carla de Souza Gomes dos Santos, E. Severo
{"title":"医疗保健供应链风险评估kpi:使用PLS-SEM的实证研究","authors":"Pedro P. Senna, A. Reis, J. Guimarães, Luís Marujo, Ana Carla de Souza Gomes dos Santos, E. Severo","doi":"10.1590/0103-6513.20220107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper aims: This study has the objective of mapping and empirically validating KPIs that can be used to assess healthcare supply chain risks. Originality: We combined two methodological approaches: i) we conducted a systematic literature review to identify the healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs and ii) We grouped these KPIs into five constructs and validated their relations using PLS-SEM. Research method: This is the only study that presents a systematic literature review to identify KPIs that measure healthcare supply chain risks, groups the KPIs into a theoretical framework, and presents a PLS-SEM validation. This study used data from Brazil, from a variety of healthcare supply chain organizations (suppliers, OEMs, clinics, and hospitals), therefore we cannot guarantee that the study can be generalized. Main findings: The systematic literature review identified 27 KPIs which were grouped into five constructs. The structural model supported by the PLS-SEM technique revealed that reliability, responsiveness, costs, and agility are antecedents to healthcare supply chain quality. Implications for theory and practice: Managers may rely upon this study to understand that healthcare supply chain reliability and responsiveness are antecedents to healthcare supply chain costs and agility, which are antecedents to healthcare supply chain quality.","PeriodicalId":34960,"journal":{"name":"Production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs: an empirical study using PLS-SEM\",\"authors\":\"Pedro P. Senna, A. Reis, J. Guimarães, Luís Marujo, Ana Carla de Souza Gomes dos Santos, E. Severo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6513.20220107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paper aims: This study has the objective of mapping and empirically validating KPIs that can be used to assess healthcare supply chain risks. Originality: We combined two methodological approaches: i) we conducted a systematic literature review to identify the healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs and ii) We grouped these KPIs into five constructs and validated their relations using PLS-SEM. Research method: This is the only study that presents a systematic literature review to identify KPIs that measure healthcare supply chain risks, groups the KPIs into a theoretical framework, and presents a PLS-SEM validation. This study used data from Brazil, from a variety of healthcare supply chain organizations (suppliers, OEMs, clinics, and hospitals), therefore we cannot guarantee that the study can be generalized. Main findings: The systematic literature review identified 27 KPIs which were grouped into five constructs. The structural model supported by the PLS-SEM technique revealed that reliability, responsiveness, costs, and agility are antecedents to healthcare supply chain quality. Implications for theory and practice: Managers may rely upon this study to understand that healthcare supply chain reliability and responsiveness are antecedents to healthcare supply chain costs and agility, which are antecedents to healthcare supply chain quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Production\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20220107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20220107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

论文目的:本研究的目标是绘制和实证验证可用于评估医疗保健供应链风险的kpi。独创性:我们结合了两种方法学方法:i)我们进行了系统的文献综述,以确定医疗保健供应链风险评估kpi; ii)我们将这些kpi分为五个结构,并使用PLS-SEM验证了它们之间的关系。研究方法:这是唯一一项提出系统文献综述的研究,以确定衡量医疗保健供应链风险的kpi,将kpi纳入理论框架,并提出PLS-SEM验证。本研究使用的数据来自巴西,来自各种医疗保健供应链组织(供应商、原始设备制造商、诊所和医院),因此我们不能保证该研究可以推广。主要发现:系统的文献综述确定了27个关键绩效指标,分为五个构念。PLS-SEM技术支持的结构模型显示,可靠性、响应性、成本和敏捷性是医疗保健供应链质量的先决条件。对理论和实践的启示:管理者可以依靠本研究来理解,医疗保健供应链的可靠性和响应性是医疗保健供应链成本和敏捷性的先决条件,而成本和敏捷性是医疗保健供应链质量的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs: an empirical study using PLS-SEM
Paper aims: This study has the objective of mapping and empirically validating KPIs that can be used to assess healthcare supply chain risks. Originality: We combined two methodological approaches: i) we conducted a systematic literature review to identify the healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs and ii) We grouped these KPIs into five constructs and validated their relations using PLS-SEM. Research method: This is the only study that presents a systematic literature review to identify KPIs that measure healthcare supply chain risks, groups the KPIs into a theoretical framework, and presents a PLS-SEM validation. This study used data from Brazil, from a variety of healthcare supply chain organizations (suppliers, OEMs, clinics, and hospitals), therefore we cannot guarantee that the study can be generalized. Main findings: The systematic literature review identified 27 KPIs which were grouped into five constructs. The structural model supported by the PLS-SEM technique revealed that reliability, responsiveness, costs, and agility are antecedents to healthcare supply chain quality. Implications for theory and practice: Managers may rely upon this study to understand that healthcare supply chain reliability and responsiveness are antecedents to healthcare supply chain costs and agility, which are antecedents to healthcare supply chain quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Production
Production Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The Produção Journal (Production Journal), ISSN 0103-6513, is a Brazilian Association of Production Engineering (ABEPRO) publication. It was created in 1990 in order to provide a communication medium for academic articles in the Production Engineering field. Since 2002, the Production Engineering Department of Polytechnic School of the University of São Paulo (PRO/EPUSP) is responsible for the editorial process of Produção Journal, sponsored by Carlos Alberto Vanzolini Foundation (FCAV). Revista Produção has the tradition of eighteen published volumes and Qualis "B2" evaluation by CAPES in the Engineering III area. For Brazilian academic community it is a top journal in Production Engineering field.
期刊最新文献
Toward the development of a Preparedness and Response Protocol for epidemics and pandemics Healthcare supply chain risk assessment KPIs: an empirical study using PLS-SEM Social Network Analysis in disaster management Action research supported by remote collaboration tools: analysis of two operations management applications Multicriteria negotiation model for selecting sustainable suppliers’ problem in the agribusiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1