通过系统的方法监测农业机械化经营绩效指标

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Scientia Agricola Pub Date : 2022-02-18 DOI:10.1590/1678-992x-2021-0143
P. Peloia, M. Milan, T. L. Romanelli, L. M. Gimenez
{"title":"通过系统的方法监测农业机械化经营绩效指标","authors":"P. Peloia, M. Milan, T. L. Romanelli, L. M. Gimenez","doi":"10.1590/1678-992x-2021-0143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Key performance indicators (KPI) are essential to decision-making in an organization, but the approach to analysis and composition used in the formulation of the KPIs can lead to errors. Analysis based only on averages does not allow for discriminating between variations that are natural to the process or special cases which require investigation. The use of control charts can identify this differentiation. However, when several charts are presented encompassing different measurement units and scales, systemic interpretation can be impaired. To assist in this interpretation, this research study aimed at proposing a method to facilitate the analysis of control charts when multiple indicators are employed in the monitoring of agricultural operations. Based on the data obtained over 26 weeks from a mechanized sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) harvesting front, six indicators were defined and analyzed through individual control charts and, systemically, through a standardized group control chart. Results show that the points identified as being outside the control zone (special causes of variation) according to the standardized group control chart were the same as those identified by the six individual charts, which demonstrates the potential of this method to summarize the information with no loss of quality of analysis.","PeriodicalId":49559,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Agricola","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring performance indicators of mechanized agricultural operations through a systemic method\",\"authors\":\"P. Peloia, M. Milan, T. L. Romanelli, L. M. Gimenez\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1678-992x-2021-0143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Key performance indicators (KPI) are essential to decision-making in an organization, but the approach to analysis and composition used in the formulation of the KPIs can lead to errors. Analysis based only on averages does not allow for discriminating between variations that are natural to the process or special cases which require investigation. The use of control charts can identify this differentiation. However, when several charts are presented encompassing different measurement units and scales, systemic interpretation can be impaired. To assist in this interpretation, this research study aimed at proposing a method to facilitate the analysis of control charts when multiple indicators are employed in the monitoring of agricultural operations. Based on the data obtained over 26 weeks from a mechanized sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) harvesting front, six indicators were defined and analyzed through individual control charts and, systemically, through a standardized group control chart. Results show that the points identified as being outside the control zone (special causes of variation) according to the standardized group control chart were the same as those identified by the six individual charts, which demonstrates the potential of this method to summarize the information with no loss of quality of analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Agricola\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Agricola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2021-0143\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Agricola","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2021-0143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关键绩效指标(KPI)对组织中的决策至关重要,但是在KPI的制定中使用的分析和组合方法可能导致错误。仅以平均值为基础的分析不能区分过程的自然变化或需要调查的特殊情况。使用控制图可以识别这种差异。然而,当几个图表包含不同的测量单位和尺度时,系统解释可能会受损。为了协助这一解释,本研究旨在提出一种在农业经营监测中采用多指标时便于控制图分析的方法。根据机械化甘蔗收获前沿26周的数据,通过个体控制图和标准化群体控制图对6个指标进行了定义和分析。结果表明,根据标准化群体控制图识别出的控制区外点(特殊变异原因)与六个单独图识别出的点相同,这表明该方法在不损失分析质量的情况下总结信息的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monitoring performance indicators of mechanized agricultural operations through a systemic method
: Key performance indicators (KPI) are essential to decision-making in an organization, but the approach to analysis and composition used in the formulation of the KPIs can lead to errors. Analysis based only on averages does not allow for discriminating between variations that are natural to the process or special cases which require investigation. The use of control charts can identify this differentiation. However, when several charts are presented encompassing different measurement units and scales, systemic interpretation can be impaired. To assist in this interpretation, this research study aimed at proposing a method to facilitate the analysis of control charts when multiple indicators are employed in the monitoring of agricultural operations. Based on the data obtained over 26 weeks from a mechanized sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) harvesting front, six indicators were defined and analyzed through individual control charts and, systemically, through a standardized group control chart. Results show that the points identified as being outside the control zone (special causes of variation) according to the standardized group control chart were the same as those identified by the six individual charts, which demonstrates the potential of this method to summarize the information with no loss of quality of analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientia Agricola
Scientia Agricola 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
78
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Scientia Agricola is a journal of the University of São Paulo edited at the Luiz de Queiroz campus in Piracicaba, a city in São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil. Scientia Agricola publishes original articles which contribute to the advancement of the agricultural, environmental and biological sciences.
期刊最新文献
Combining deep learning and X-ray imaging technology to assess tomato seed quality Initial performance and genetic diversity of coffee trees cultivated under contrasting altitude conditions Charting new sustainable agricultural innovation pathways in Brazil Predictors of Outcomes in Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort. AgroReg: main regression models in agricultural sciences implemented as an R Package
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1