通过筛查降低肺癌死亡率-肺癌联盟的经验

IF 0.7 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Oral History Review Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.17925/OHR.2017.13.01.17
L. F. Ambrose, A. Copeland, J. King
{"title":"通过筛查降低肺癌死亡率-肺癌联盟的经验","authors":"L. F. Ambrose, A. Copeland, J. King","doi":"10.17925/OHR.2017.13.01.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corresponding Author: Jennifer C King, PhD, 1700 K Street NW, Ste 660, Washington, DC 20006, US. E: jking@lungcanceralliance.org Over the past several years, there has been a profound paradigm shift for those at high risk for lung cancer due to the development and release of scientific validation and national guidelines and recommendations for lung cancer screening. The lung cancer community is poised to realize an unprecedented scale and magnitude of benefit from early detection due to five-year survival rates of only 4.3% when lung cancer is diagnosed as metastatic disease versus 55.2% when confined to the primary site. Given the import and potential of this opportunity, there has been a clear need to develop programs and guidance to ensure the safe, responsible, and equitable implementation of lung cancer screening and to bring proper health messages to those at risk. Lung Cancer Alliance (LCA), a national non-profit cancer advocacy organization, recognized this gap and has stepped in to support the adoption of best practices and consumer safety measures, as well as public service messaging about screening risk and benefit.","PeriodicalId":44122,"journal":{"name":"Oral History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decreasing Lung Cancer Mortality through Screening—The Lung Cancer Alliance Experience\",\"authors\":\"L. F. Ambrose, A. Copeland, J. King\",\"doi\":\"10.17925/OHR.2017.13.01.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corresponding Author: Jennifer C King, PhD, 1700 K Street NW, Ste 660, Washington, DC 20006, US. E: jking@lungcanceralliance.org Over the past several years, there has been a profound paradigm shift for those at high risk for lung cancer due to the development and release of scientific validation and national guidelines and recommendations for lung cancer screening. The lung cancer community is poised to realize an unprecedented scale and magnitude of benefit from early detection due to five-year survival rates of only 4.3% when lung cancer is diagnosed as metastatic disease versus 55.2% when confined to the primary site. Given the import and potential of this opportunity, there has been a clear need to develop programs and guidance to ensure the safe, responsible, and equitable implementation of lung cancer screening and to bring proper health messages to those at risk. Lung Cancer Alliance (LCA), a national non-profit cancer advocacy organization, recognized this gap and has stepped in to support the adoption of best practices and consumer safety measures, as well as public service messaging about screening risk and benefit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral History Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17925/OHR.2017.13.01.17\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/OHR.2017.13.01.17","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通讯作者:Jennifer C King, PhD, 1700 K Street NW, st 660, Washington, DC 20006, US。E: jking@lungcanceralliance.org在过去的几年中,由于科学验证和国家肺癌筛查指南和建议的制定和发布,对肺癌高危人群的模式发生了深刻的转变。由于肺癌被诊断为转移性疾病时的5年生存率仅为4.3%,而局限于原发部位时的5年生存率为55.2%,肺癌社区准备从早期检测中实现前所未有的规模和巨大效益。鉴于这一机会的重要性和潜力,显然有必要制定规划和指导,以确保安全、负责和公平地实施肺癌筛查,并向高危人群提供适当的健康信息。肺癌联盟(LCA)是一个全国性的非营利性癌症倡导组织,它认识到这一差距,并已介入支持采用最佳做法和消费者安全措施,以及有关筛查风险和益处的公共服务信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decreasing Lung Cancer Mortality through Screening—The Lung Cancer Alliance Experience
Corresponding Author: Jennifer C King, PhD, 1700 K Street NW, Ste 660, Washington, DC 20006, US. E: jking@lungcanceralliance.org Over the past several years, there has been a profound paradigm shift for those at high risk for lung cancer due to the development and release of scientific validation and national guidelines and recommendations for lung cancer screening. The lung cancer community is poised to realize an unprecedented scale and magnitude of benefit from early detection due to five-year survival rates of only 4.3% when lung cancer is diagnosed as metastatic disease versus 55.2% when confined to the primary site. Given the import and potential of this opportunity, there has been a clear need to develop programs and guidance to ensure the safe, responsible, and equitable implementation of lung cancer screening and to bring proper health messages to those at risk. Lung Cancer Alliance (LCA), a national non-profit cancer advocacy organization, recognized this gap and has stepped in to support the adoption of best practices and consumer safety measures, as well as public service messaging about screening risk and benefit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
27.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Oral History Review, published by the Oral History Association, is the U.S. journal of record for the theory and practice of oral history and related fields. The journal’s primary mission is to explore the nature and significance of oral history and advance understanding of the field among scholars, educators, practitioners, and the general public. The Review publishes narrative and analytical articles and reviews, in print and multimedia formats, that present and use oral history in unique and significant ways and that contribute to the understanding of the nature of oral history and memory. It seeks previously unpublished works that demonstrate high-quality research and that offer new insight into oral history practice, methodology, theory, and pedagogy. Work published in the journal arises from many fields and disciplines, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of oral history. While based in the U.S., the Review reflects the international scope of the field and encourages work from international authors and about international topics.
期刊最新文献
Literal Belonging: Safe Outdoor Spaces Modeling Oral History Making Tall Tales and Half-Truths: Negotiating Anxiety and Precarity in Contemporary Ahmedabad Tuning In: Emotions, Relations, and Dynamics in the Analysis of an Archived Interview Storytelling in Museums Creating an Oral History Archive of Government Work: The Women in Public Service in Pakistan Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1