简介:漏洞挑战

L. Re
{"title":"简介:漏洞挑战","authors":"L. Re","doi":"10.18351/2179-7137/GED.V5N3P1-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay presents a discussion of vulnerability theory from a philosophical and a sociological perspective. The success of this new paradigm in the social sciences and even in the public discourse appears justified by the need to rethink the institutions and social ties of late modernity, also from a gender perspective. It is undoubtedly a fascinating prospect, but one that conceals numerous pitfalls. In particular, ideas of agency, conflict, emancipation and solidarity, which are closely connected with fundamental rights theory and the development of constitutionalism may lose importance. The vulnerability paradigm, rather than eclipsing the language of rights, could then be used to interpret these rights, to define them with increasing accuracy and reinforce their effectiveness. In particular, the bottom-up construction of an emancipatory notion of vulnerability may well lead to an auspicious update of the interpretation of the principles of dignity, equality and solidarity, principles that nevertheless still appear today as indispensable","PeriodicalId":42602,"journal":{"name":"Revista Genero & Direito","volume":"128 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTRODUCTION:THE VULNERABILITY CHALLENGE\",\"authors\":\"L. Re\",\"doi\":\"10.18351/2179-7137/GED.V5N3P1-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essay presents a discussion of vulnerability theory from a philosophical and a sociological perspective. The success of this new paradigm in the social sciences and even in the public discourse appears justified by the need to rethink the institutions and social ties of late modernity, also from a gender perspective. It is undoubtedly a fascinating prospect, but one that conceals numerous pitfalls. In particular, ideas of agency, conflict, emancipation and solidarity, which are closely connected with fundamental rights theory and the development of constitutionalism may lose importance. The vulnerability paradigm, rather than eclipsing the language of rights, could then be used to interpret these rights, to define them with increasing accuracy and reinforce their effectiveness. In particular, the bottom-up construction of an emancipatory notion of vulnerability may well lead to an auspicious update of the interpretation of the principles of dignity, equality and solidarity, principles that nevertheless still appear today as indispensable\",\"PeriodicalId\":42602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Genero & Direito\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Genero & Direito\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18351/2179-7137/GED.V5N3P1-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Genero & Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18351/2179-7137/GED.V5N3P1-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文从哲学和社会学的角度对脆弱性理论进行了探讨。这种新范式在社会科学甚至公共话语中的成功似乎是合理的,因为需要重新思考现代性晚期的制度和社会关系,也从性别的角度来看。这无疑是一个迷人的前景,但也隐藏着许多陷阱。特别是与基本权利理论和宪政发展密切相关的能动性、冲突性、解放性和团结性等思想可能会失去其重要性。然后,可以使用脆弱性范式来解释这些权利,更加准确地定义这些权利并加强其效力,而不是使权利的语言黯然失色。特别是,自下而上地构建一个解放的脆弱性概念,很可能导致对尊严、平等和团结原则的解释有一个可喜的更新,而这些原则在今天看来仍然是不可或缺的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INTRODUCTION:THE VULNERABILITY CHALLENGE
The essay presents a discussion of vulnerability theory from a philosophical and a sociological perspective. The success of this new paradigm in the social sciences and even in the public discourse appears justified by the need to rethink the institutions and social ties of late modernity, also from a gender perspective. It is undoubtedly a fascinating prospect, but one that conceals numerous pitfalls. In particular, ideas of agency, conflict, emancipation and solidarity, which are closely connected with fundamental rights theory and the development of constitutionalism may lose importance. The vulnerability paradigm, rather than eclipsing the language of rights, could then be used to interpret these rights, to define them with increasing accuracy and reinforce their effectiveness. In particular, the bottom-up construction of an emancipatory notion of vulnerability may well lead to an auspicious update of the interpretation of the principles of dignity, equality and solidarity, principles that nevertheless still appear today as indispensable
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Genero & Direito
Revista Genero & Direito SOCIAL ISSUES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Il soggetto vulnerabile e lo Stato responsabile INTRODUCTION:THE VULNERABILITY CHALLENGE VULNERABILITY AND THE (DISABILITY) LAW: STATUS, CHALLENGES AND PROMISES OF A CONTROVERSIAL CATEGORY INSEGUROS Y LIBRES: VULNERABILIDAD Y RESILENCIA EN EL LÉXICO POLÍTICO-JURÍDICO DEL NEOLIBERALISMO LA VULNERABILITE ENTRE HUMANISME ET POST-HUMANISME ANTI-SPECISTE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1