从学生的角度看大学教授的评价

Q4 Social Sciences Educacao e Pesquisa Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s1678-4634202349241907eng
Bilda Valentín-Martínez, Cristina Mayor-Ruiz
{"title":"从学生的角度看大学教授的评价","authors":"Bilda Valentín-Martínez, Cristina Mayor-Ruiz","doi":"10.1590/s1678-4634202349241907eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The main objective of this article is to analyze the perception that students have of the professor evaluation system in their universities. Although in most universities in the Dominican Republic the evaluation is done by coordinators, professors and students, in this study the situation is investigated based on the results analyzed in the opinions of 347 students from different disciplines of the Education career of seven higher education institutions in this country. Thus, a questionnaire of open ended and closed ended questions is applied, which makes it possible to verify the level of satisfaction that these actors have in the professor evaluation process. The participating population is selected by means of a non-probabilistic, incidental casual method, directly choosing the participants of the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth semesters. The results indicate that students consider it of great value to be taken into account in the evaluation process of their professors, who appreciate the level of reliability of the application of the evaluation instrument; but that the evaluation could be improved by taking into account other components that do not appear in it and integrating open-ended questions, which allow them to express their opinions more accurately. The results are relevant for the design of a new professor evaluation system.","PeriodicalId":35419,"journal":{"name":"Educacao e Pesquisa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evaluation of university professors: a look from the students\",\"authors\":\"Bilda Valentín-Martínez, Cristina Mayor-Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1678-4634202349241907eng\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The main objective of this article is to analyze the perception that students have of the professor evaluation system in their universities. Although in most universities in the Dominican Republic the evaluation is done by coordinators, professors and students, in this study the situation is investigated based on the results analyzed in the opinions of 347 students from different disciplines of the Education career of seven higher education institutions in this country. Thus, a questionnaire of open ended and closed ended questions is applied, which makes it possible to verify the level of satisfaction that these actors have in the professor evaluation process. The participating population is selected by means of a non-probabilistic, incidental casual method, directly choosing the participants of the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth semesters. The results indicate that students consider it of great value to be taken into account in the evaluation process of their professors, who appreciate the level of reliability of the application of the evaluation instrument; but that the evaluation could be improved by taking into account other components that do not appear in it and integrating open-ended questions, which allow them to express their opinions more accurately. The results are relevant for the design of a new professor evaluation system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educacao e Pesquisa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educacao e Pesquisa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634202349241907eng\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634202349241907eng","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文的主要目的是分析学生对高校教授评价制度的看法。虽然在多米尼加共和国的大多数大学中,评估是由协调员、教授和学生完成的,但在本研究中,情况是根据对该国七所高等教育机构的347名来自不同学科的学生的意见进行分析的结果来调查的。因此,我们采用了开放式和封闭式问题的问卷,从而可以验证这些参与者在教授评价过程中的满意度。参与人群的选择采用非概率的、偶然的随机方法,直接选择第五、第六、第七、第八和第九学期的参与者。结果表明,学生认为在教授的评价过程中应将其考虑在内,教授对评价工具应用的可靠性水平表示赞赏;但是,如果考虑到没有出现在评估中的其他部分,并整合开放式问题,评估可以得到改进,这使他们能够更准确地表达自己的意见。研究结果对新的教授评价体系的设计具有一定的指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The evaluation of university professors: a look from the students
Abstract The main objective of this article is to analyze the perception that students have of the professor evaluation system in their universities. Although in most universities in the Dominican Republic the evaluation is done by coordinators, professors and students, in this study the situation is investigated based on the results analyzed in the opinions of 347 students from different disciplines of the Education career of seven higher education institutions in this country. Thus, a questionnaire of open ended and closed ended questions is applied, which makes it possible to verify the level of satisfaction that these actors have in the professor evaluation process. The participating population is selected by means of a non-probabilistic, incidental casual method, directly choosing the participants of the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth semesters. The results indicate that students consider it of great value to be taken into account in the evaluation process of their professors, who appreciate the level of reliability of the application of the evaluation instrument; but that the evaluation could be improved by taking into account other components that do not appear in it and integrating open-ended questions, which allow them to express their opinions more accurately. The results are relevant for the design of a new professor evaluation system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educacao e Pesquisa
Educacao e Pesquisa Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: EDUCAÇÃO E PESQUISA é uma publicação quadrimestral da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo – FEUSP. Publicada desde 1975, a revista aceita artigos em português, francês, espanhol e inglês. Publica artigos inéditos na área de educação, em especial resultados de pesquisa de caráter teórico ou empírico, revisões da literatura de pesquisa educacional e reflexões críticas sobre experiências pedagógicas.
期刊最新文献
Os bebês na sala do berçário: diferentes trajetórias no espaço Análisis de la competencia digital de futuros profesionales de la educación en tiempos de pandemia Educação física no ensino médio daEducação de Jovens e Adultos: (im) possibilidades pedagógicas sobre o corpo El sueño de la crítica produce monstruos: Educación en disputa, entre libertad y barbarie Perspectiva de género en actitudes hacia la probabilidad y su enseñanza en futuro profesorado chileno
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1