C. Geady, D. Shultz, A. Razak, S. Schuetze, Benjamin Haibe-Kains
{"title":"放射组学在肉瘤试验中的应用:对RECIST患者评估的补充","authors":"C. Geady, D. Shultz, A. Razak, S. Schuetze, Benjamin Haibe-Kains","doi":"10.20517/2394-4722.2022.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radiological imaging has a critical role in the diagnosis of sarcomas and in evaluating therapy response assessment. The current gold standard for response assessment in solid tumors is the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, which evaluates changes in tumor size as a surrogate endpoint for therapeutic efficacy. However, tumors may undergo necrosis, changes in vascularization or become cystic in response to therapy, with no significant volume changes; thus, size assessments alone may not be adequate. Such morphological changes may give rise to radiographic phenotypes that are not easily detected by human operators. Fortunately, recent advances in high-performance computing and machine learning algorithms have enabled deep analysis of radiological images to extract features that can provide richer information about intensity, shape, size or volume, and texture of tumor phenotypes. There is growing evidence to suggest that these image-derived or “radiomic features” are sensitive to biological processes such as necrosis and glucose metabolism. Thus, radiomics could prove to be a critical tool for assessing treatment response and may present an integral complement to existing response criteria, opening new avenues for patient assessment in sarcoma trials.","PeriodicalId":15167,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiomics in sarcoma trials: a complement to RECIST for patient assessment\",\"authors\":\"C. Geady, D. Shultz, A. Razak, S. Schuetze, Benjamin Haibe-Kains\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/2394-4722.2022.57\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Radiological imaging has a critical role in the diagnosis of sarcomas and in evaluating therapy response assessment. The current gold standard for response assessment in solid tumors is the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, which evaluates changes in tumor size as a surrogate endpoint for therapeutic efficacy. However, tumors may undergo necrosis, changes in vascularization or become cystic in response to therapy, with no significant volume changes; thus, size assessments alone may not be adequate. Such morphological changes may give rise to radiographic phenotypes that are not easily detected by human operators. Fortunately, recent advances in high-performance computing and machine learning algorithms have enabled deep analysis of radiological images to extract features that can provide richer information about intensity, shape, size or volume, and texture of tumor phenotypes. There is growing evidence to suggest that these image-derived or “radiomic features” are sensitive to biological processes such as necrosis and glucose metabolism. Thus, radiomics could prove to be a critical tool for assessing treatment response and may present an integral complement to existing response criteria, opening new avenues for patient assessment in sarcoma trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.57\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
放射成像在肉瘤的诊断和治疗反应评估中具有关键作用。目前评估实体肿瘤疗效的金标准是《实体肿瘤疗效评价标准》(response Evaluation Criteria in solid tumors),该标准将肿瘤大小的变化作为治疗疗效的替代终点。然而,肿瘤在治疗后可能发生坏死、血管化改变或变囊,体积无明显变化;因此,单独进行规模评估可能是不够的。这样的形态变化可能会引起不容易被人类操作员检测到的射线照相表型。幸运的是,高性能计算和机器学习算法的最新进展已经能够对放射图像进行深度分析,以提取可以提供有关肿瘤表型的强度、形状、大小或体积和纹理的更丰富信息的特征。越来越多的证据表明,这些图像衍生或“放射学特征”对诸如坏死和葡萄糖代谢等生物过程敏感。因此,放射组学可能被证明是评估治疗反应的关键工具,并可能对现有的反应标准提供一个完整的补充,为肉瘤试验中的患者评估开辟了新的途径。
Radiomics in sarcoma trials: a complement to RECIST for patient assessment
Radiological imaging has a critical role in the diagnosis of sarcomas and in evaluating therapy response assessment. The current gold standard for response assessment in solid tumors is the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, which evaluates changes in tumor size as a surrogate endpoint for therapeutic efficacy. However, tumors may undergo necrosis, changes in vascularization or become cystic in response to therapy, with no significant volume changes; thus, size assessments alone may not be adequate. Such morphological changes may give rise to radiographic phenotypes that are not easily detected by human operators. Fortunately, recent advances in high-performance computing and machine learning algorithms have enabled deep analysis of radiological images to extract features that can provide richer information about intensity, shape, size or volume, and texture of tumor phenotypes. There is growing evidence to suggest that these image-derived or “radiomic features” are sensitive to biological processes such as necrosis and glucose metabolism. Thus, radiomics could prove to be a critical tool for assessing treatment response and may present an integral complement to existing response criteria, opening new avenues for patient assessment in sarcoma trials.