肝定向放射治疗反应评估:当前指南、挑战和未来方向

Amra Banda, G. Johnson, G. Cunha
{"title":"肝定向放射治疗反应评估:当前指南、挑战和未来方向","authors":"Amra Banda, G. Johnson, G. Cunha","doi":"10.20517/2394-5079.2022.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radiation-based local-regional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have gained wide acceptance due to promising rates of tumor response, survival, and safety profiles. After treatment, it is important to assess tumor response to determine further management, patient prognosis, and endpoint outcomes for clinical trials. To standardize imaging interpretation and reporting of HCC response to local-regional treatment, a few imaging-based response assessment systems were developed. Two of them have emerged as the most used: the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm (LR-TRA) and the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). While these systems have been validated for the assessment of response to ablative locoregional therapies, assessment of response to radiation-based therapies can be challenged by persistent or evolving imaging features and is still an area of active research. Following the advances in technology and a better understanding of tumor biology that allowed for the increased application of radiation-based local-regional therapies for the treatment of HCC, research is still needed to address the limitations of current imaging criteria for assessing tumor response to these novel techniques. In this review, we describe radiation-based liver-directed treatment options, examine imaging criteria for assessing treatment response, discuss practical limitations and gaps in knowledge when applying these response criteria, and address future directions that may help to improve accuracy and outcomes when assessing response to radiation-based HCC treatment.","PeriodicalId":12959,"journal":{"name":"Hepatoma Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of response to liver directed radiation-based therapies: Current guidelines, challenges, and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Amra Banda, G. Johnson, G. Cunha\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/2394-5079.2022.60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Radiation-based local-regional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have gained wide acceptance due to promising rates of tumor response, survival, and safety profiles. After treatment, it is important to assess tumor response to determine further management, patient prognosis, and endpoint outcomes for clinical trials. To standardize imaging interpretation and reporting of HCC response to local-regional treatment, a few imaging-based response assessment systems were developed. Two of them have emerged as the most used: the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm (LR-TRA) and the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). While these systems have been validated for the assessment of response to ablative locoregional therapies, assessment of response to radiation-based therapies can be challenged by persistent or evolving imaging features and is still an area of active research. Following the advances in technology and a better understanding of tumor biology that allowed for the increased application of radiation-based local-regional therapies for the treatment of HCC, research is still needed to address the limitations of current imaging criteria for assessing tumor response to these novel techniques. In this review, we describe radiation-based liver-directed treatment options, examine imaging criteria for assessing treatment response, discuss practical limitations and gaps in knowledge when applying these response criteria, and address future directions that may help to improve accuracy and outcomes when assessing response to radiation-based HCC treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatoma Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatoma Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2022.60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2022.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于放射的局部区域治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)因其有希望的肿瘤反应率、生存率和安全性而获得广泛接受。治疗后,重要的是评估肿瘤反应,以确定进一步的管理,患者预后和临床试验的终点结果。为了规范HCC对局部-区域治疗反应的影像学解释和报告,开发了一些基于影像学的反应评估系统。其中最常用的两种方法是:肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)治疗反应算法(LR-TRA)和实体肿瘤反应评价标准(mRECIST)。虽然这些系统已被验证用于评估对局部区域消融治疗的反应,但对基于放射治疗的反应评估可能会受到持续或不断变化的影像学特征的挑战,这仍然是一个积极研究的领域。随着技术的进步和对肿瘤生物学的更好理解,基于放射的局部区域疗法在HCC治疗中的应用越来越多,目前评估肿瘤对这些新技术反应的成像标准的局限性仍然需要研究。在这篇综述中,我们描述了基于放射的肝脏定向治疗方案,检查了评估治疗反应的影像学标准,讨论了应用这些反应标准时的实际局限性和知识空白,并指出了未来可能有助于提高评估基于放射的HCC治疗反应的准确性和结果的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of response to liver directed radiation-based therapies: Current guidelines, challenges, and future directions
Radiation-based local-regional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have gained wide acceptance due to promising rates of tumor response, survival, and safety profiles. After treatment, it is important to assess tumor response to determine further management, patient prognosis, and endpoint outcomes for clinical trials. To standardize imaging interpretation and reporting of HCC response to local-regional treatment, a few imaging-based response assessment systems were developed. Two of them have emerged as the most used: the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm (LR-TRA) and the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). While these systems have been validated for the assessment of response to ablative locoregional therapies, assessment of response to radiation-based therapies can be challenged by persistent or evolving imaging features and is still an area of active research. Following the advances in technology and a better understanding of tumor biology that allowed for the increased application of radiation-based local-regional therapies for the treatment of HCC, research is still needed to address the limitations of current imaging criteria for assessing tumor response to these novel techniques. In this review, we describe radiation-based liver-directed treatment options, examine imaging criteria for assessing treatment response, discuss practical limitations and gaps in knowledge when applying these response criteria, and address future directions that may help to improve accuracy and outcomes when assessing response to radiation-based HCC treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary assessment of tumor response after internal and external radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma Interpretation of the updates of the chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer (CNLC-2024 Edition) Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy: a review with technical notes Measures for response assessment in HCC treatment Impact of diet and gut microbiota changes in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1