骨示踪剂心脏闪烁显像的临床应用:心脏淀粉样变性的争议和缺陷

F. Mattana, L. Muraglia, Francesca Girardi, I. Cerio, A. Porcari, F. Dore, R. Bonfiglioli, S. Fanti
{"title":"骨示踪剂心脏闪烁显像的临床应用:心脏淀粉样变性的争议和缺陷","authors":"F. Mattana, L. Muraglia, Francesca Girardi, I. Cerio, A. Porcari, F. Dore, R. Bonfiglioli, S. Fanti","doi":"10.20517/2574-1209.2021.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a life-threatening disease caused by extracellular deposition of amyloidogenic proteins in the heart tissue; it could be associated with a poor prognosis and remains underdiagnosed and underestimated. During the last years, bone scintigraphy has been widely used to facilitate the diagnosis of CA, avoid endomyocardial biopsy, and differentiate amyloid light-chain amyloidosis from transthyretin amyloidosis. Technetium-99m pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) is the most used tracer in the United States, but a standardized and shared acquisition protocol is still lacking; technetium-99m 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (99mTc-DPD) is widely used in Europe and can count on a more grounded data than 99mTc-PYP. Both tracers suffer from some diagnostic limitations (due to their biochemical characteristics) and pitfalls that can lead to a misdiagnosis of CA. We aim to briefly describe the main differences between 99mTc-PYP and 99mTc-DPD, analyzing the data available in the literature and highlighting the most frequent causes of misdiagnosis and pitfalls. Both 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-PYP show good accuracy for the diagnosis of CA with high specificity and sensibility. Nevertheless, to achieve this accuracy, the correct acquisition protocols must be followed for each tracer, as suggested in the latest recommendation. Proper diagnosis of CA has a crucial role in patient management; therefore, it is important for nuclear physicians to have the most specific approaches in acquiring and interpreting bone scintigraphy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.","PeriodicalId":75299,"journal":{"name":"Vessel plus","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical application of cardiac scintigraphy with bone tracers: controversies and pitfalls in cardiac amyloidosis\",\"authors\":\"F. Mattana, L. Muraglia, Francesca Girardi, I. Cerio, A. Porcari, F. Dore, R. Bonfiglioli, S. Fanti\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/2574-1209.2021.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a life-threatening disease caused by extracellular deposition of amyloidogenic proteins in the heart tissue; it could be associated with a poor prognosis and remains underdiagnosed and underestimated. During the last years, bone scintigraphy has been widely used to facilitate the diagnosis of CA, avoid endomyocardial biopsy, and differentiate amyloid light-chain amyloidosis from transthyretin amyloidosis. Technetium-99m pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) is the most used tracer in the United States, but a standardized and shared acquisition protocol is still lacking; technetium-99m 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (99mTc-DPD) is widely used in Europe and can count on a more grounded data than 99mTc-PYP. Both tracers suffer from some diagnostic limitations (due to their biochemical characteristics) and pitfalls that can lead to a misdiagnosis of CA. We aim to briefly describe the main differences between 99mTc-PYP and 99mTc-DPD, analyzing the data available in the literature and highlighting the most frequent causes of misdiagnosis and pitfalls. Both 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-PYP show good accuracy for the diagnosis of CA with high specificity and sensibility. Nevertheless, to achieve this accuracy, the correct acquisition protocols must be followed for each tracer, as suggested in the latest recommendation. Proper diagnosis of CA has a crucial role in patient management; therefore, it is important for nuclear physicians to have the most specific approaches in acquiring and interpreting bone scintigraphy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vessel plus\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vessel plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2021.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vessel plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2021.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

心脏淀粉样变性(CA)是由淀粉样蛋白在心脏组织的细胞外沉积引起的一种危及生命的疾病;它可能与预后不良有关,仍未得到充分诊断和低估。近年来,骨显像已被广泛应用于CA的诊断,避免心内膜活检,以及区分淀粉样蛋白轻链淀粉样变性和甲状腺转蛋白淀粉样变性。锝-99m焦磷酸(99mTc-PYP)是美国使用最多的示踪剂,但仍缺乏标准化和共享的获取协议;锝-99m - 3,3-二膦-1,2-丙二羧酸(99mTc-DPD)在欧洲广泛使用,其数据比99mTc-PYP更可靠。这两种示踪剂都存在一些诊断局限性(由于其生化特性)和可能导致CA误诊的陷阱。我们的目的是简要描述99mTc-PYP和99mTc-DPD之间的主要区别,分析文献中可用的数据,并强调误诊和陷阱的最常见原因。99mTc-DPD和99mTc-PYP对CA的诊断准确性好,特异性和敏感性高。然而,为了达到这种准确性,必须按照最新的建议,对每种示踪剂采用正确的获取方案。CA的正确诊断在患者管理中具有关键作用;因此,对于核内科医生来说,在获取和解释经甲状腺素型心脏淀粉样变性的骨显像时,有最具体的方法是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical application of cardiac scintigraphy with bone tracers: controversies and pitfalls in cardiac amyloidosis
Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a life-threatening disease caused by extracellular deposition of amyloidogenic proteins in the heart tissue; it could be associated with a poor prognosis and remains underdiagnosed and underestimated. During the last years, bone scintigraphy has been widely used to facilitate the diagnosis of CA, avoid endomyocardial biopsy, and differentiate amyloid light-chain amyloidosis from transthyretin amyloidosis. Technetium-99m pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) is the most used tracer in the United States, but a standardized and shared acquisition protocol is still lacking; technetium-99m 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (99mTc-DPD) is widely used in Europe and can count on a more grounded data than 99mTc-PYP. Both tracers suffer from some diagnostic limitations (due to their biochemical characteristics) and pitfalls that can lead to a misdiagnosis of CA. We aim to briefly describe the main differences between 99mTc-PYP and 99mTc-DPD, analyzing the data available in the literature and highlighting the most frequent causes of misdiagnosis and pitfalls. Both 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-PYP show good accuracy for the diagnosis of CA with high specificity and sensibility. Nevertheless, to achieve this accuracy, the correct acquisition protocols must be followed for each tracer, as suggested in the latest recommendation. Proper diagnosis of CA has a crucial role in patient management; therefore, it is important for nuclear physicians to have the most specific approaches in acquiring and interpreting bone scintigraphy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Echocardiographic cardiac views classification using whale optimization and weighted support vector machine Association of inflammation, oxidative stress, and deteriorated cognitive functions in patients after cardiac surgery Role of inflammation in the progression of diabetic kidney disease Multivessel disease in patient with acute myocardial infarction: current treatment strategies and future perspectives Editorial review: guidance for future atrial fibrillation research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1