白皮书:人工智能在临床手术中的伦理与可信度

G. Capelli, Daunia Verdi, I. Frigerio, Niki Rashidian, Antonella Ficorilli, Vincent Grasso, D. Majidi, ANDREW GUMBS, G. Spolverato
{"title":"白皮书:人工智能在临床手术中的伦理与可信度","authors":"G. Capelli, Daunia Verdi, I. Frigerio, Niki Rashidian, Antonella Ficorilli, Vincent Grasso, D. Majidi, ANDREW GUMBS, G. Spolverato","doi":"10.20517/ais.2023.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This white paper documents the consensus opinion of the Artificial Intelligence Surgery (AIS) task force on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics and the AIS Editorial Board Study Group on Ethics on the ethical considerations and current trustworthiness of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in surgery. The ethics were divided into 6 topics defined by the Task Force: Reliability of robotic and AI systems; Respect for privacy and sensitive data; Use of complete and representative (i.e., unbiased) data; Transparencies and uncertainties in AI; Fairness: are we exacerbating inequalities in access to healthcare?; Technology as an equalizer in surgical education. Task Force members were asked to research a topic, draft a section, and come up with several potential consensus statements. These were voted on by members of the Task Force and the Study Group, and all proposals that received > 75 % agreement were adopted and included in the White Paper.","PeriodicalId":72305,"journal":{"name":"Artificial intelligence surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"White paper: ethics and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence in clinical surgery\",\"authors\":\"G. Capelli, Daunia Verdi, I. Frigerio, Niki Rashidian, Antonella Ficorilli, Vincent Grasso, D. Majidi, ANDREW GUMBS, G. Spolverato\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/ais.2023.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This white paper documents the consensus opinion of the Artificial Intelligence Surgery (AIS) task force on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics and the AIS Editorial Board Study Group on Ethics on the ethical considerations and current trustworthiness of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in surgery. The ethics were divided into 6 topics defined by the Task Force: Reliability of robotic and AI systems; Respect for privacy and sensitive data; Use of complete and representative (i.e., unbiased) data; Transparencies and uncertainties in AI; Fairness: are we exacerbating inequalities in access to healthcare?; Technology as an equalizer in surgical education. Task Force members were asked to research a topic, draft a section, and come up with several potential consensus statements. These were voted on by members of the Task Force and the Study Group, and all proposals that received > 75 % agreement were adopted and included in the White Paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial intelligence surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial intelligence surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/ais.2023.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial intelligence surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/ais.2023.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本白皮书记录了人工智能外科(AIS)人工智能(AI)伦理工作组和AIS编辑委员会伦理研究小组关于人工智能和手术自主行为的伦理考虑和当前可信度的共识意见。伦理被分为6个主题,由工作组定义:机器人和人工智能系统的可靠性;尊重私隐及敏感资料;使用完整和具有代表性(即无偏)的数据;人工智能的透明度和不确定性;公平:我们是否加剧了获得医疗服务的不平等?技术在外科教育中的平衡作用。工作组成员被要求研究一个主题,起草一个章节,并提出几个潜在的共识声明。这些建议由工作组和研究小组的成员投票表决,所有获得75%以上同意的建议被采纳并纳入白皮书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
White paper: ethics and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence in clinical surgery
This white paper documents the consensus opinion of the Artificial Intelligence Surgery (AIS) task force on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics and the AIS Editorial Board Study Group on Ethics on the ethical considerations and current trustworthiness of artificial intelligence and autonomous actions in surgery. The ethics were divided into 6 topics defined by the Task Force: Reliability of robotic and AI systems; Respect for privacy and sensitive data; Use of complete and representative (i.e., unbiased) data; Transparencies and uncertainties in AI; Fairness: are we exacerbating inequalities in access to healthcare?; Technology as an equalizer in surgical education. Task Force members were asked to research a topic, draft a section, and come up with several potential consensus statements. These were voted on by members of the Task Force and the Study Group, and all proposals that received > 75 % agreement were adopted and included in the White Paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robotic caudo-peripheral approach for liver parenchymal transection in anatomical liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma Digital twins as a unifying framework for surgical data science: the enabling role of geometric scene understanding The health technology assessment in the artificial intelligence era: the AI surgical department The 1st Orsi Innotech Surgical AI Day congress report The 1st Orsi Innotech Surgical AI Day congress report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1