获得博士学位:南非高等教育在毕业生特质方面取得成功了吗?

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH South African Journal of Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.20853/37-2-5370
F. Faller, S. Burton, A. Kaniki, A. Leitch, I. Ntshoe
{"title":"获得博士学位:南非高等教育在毕业生特质方面取得成功了吗?","authors":"F. Faller, S. Burton, A. Kaniki, A. Leitch, I. Ntshoe","doi":"10.20853/37-2-5370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article applies findings from the recent national review of South African doctoral qualifications to examine ways in which universities interpret the formulation of, and apply in the context of a differentiated higher education system, the graduate attributes established in the qualification standard, in order to achieve the characteristics of “doctorateness”. The article explores the concept “graduate attributes” itself, the extent to which it is manifested in institutional, supervisory and examination practices, and how the concept is conveyed to and understood by students. National review findings indicate inconsistencies in conceptualisation and application both between and within institutions. In this article, emphasis is placed on the primary need of developing in the doctoral graduate the capacity to enter, as a deep-thinking researcher, into a community of practising peers, whether in the academy or in a profession","PeriodicalId":44786,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving doctorateness: Is South African higher education succeeding with graduate attributes?\",\"authors\":\"F. Faller, S. Burton, A. Kaniki, A. Leitch, I. Ntshoe\",\"doi\":\"10.20853/37-2-5370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article applies findings from the recent national review of South African doctoral qualifications to examine ways in which universities interpret the formulation of, and apply in the context of a differentiated higher education system, the graduate attributes established in the qualification standard, in order to achieve the characteristics of “doctorateness”. The article explores the concept “graduate attributes” itself, the extent to which it is manifested in institutional, supervisory and examination practices, and how the concept is conveyed to and understood by students. National review findings indicate inconsistencies in conceptualisation and application both between and within institutions. In this article, emphasis is placed on the primary need of developing in the doctoral graduate the capacity to enter, as a deep-thinking researcher, into a community of practising peers, whether in the academy or in a profession\",\"PeriodicalId\":44786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20853/37-2-5370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20853/37-2-5370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文运用最近南非博士资格全国审查的结果,研究大学如何解释资格标准中确立的研究生属性的制定,并在差异化高等教育体系的背景下应用,以实现“博士性”的特征。本文探讨了“毕业生属性”概念本身,它在制度、监督和考试实践中的体现程度,以及如何向学生传达和理解这一概念。国家审查结果表明,机构之间和机构内部在概念和应用方面存在不一致。在这篇文章中,重点放在培养博士研究生的能力上,作为一个有深度思考的研究者,进入一个实践同行的社区,无论是在学术界还是在一个专业领域
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Achieving doctorateness: Is South African higher education succeeding with graduate attributes?
This article applies findings from the recent national review of South African doctoral qualifications to examine ways in which universities interpret the formulation of, and apply in the context of a differentiated higher education system, the graduate attributes established in the qualification standard, in order to achieve the characteristics of “doctorateness”. The article explores the concept “graduate attributes” itself, the extent to which it is manifested in institutional, supervisory and examination practices, and how the concept is conveyed to and understood by students. National review findings indicate inconsistencies in conceptualisation and application both between and within institutions. In this article, emphasis is placed on the primary need of developing in the doctoral graduate the capacity to enter, as a deep-thinking researcher, into a community of practising peers, whether in the academy or in a profession
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Higher Education
South African Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
28.60%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of key success factors in postgraduate studies Internationalisation and the lived experiences of Non-South African postgraduate students in accessing higher education in South Africa Barriers towards research activities among academics in the chartered accountancy stream at the North-West University, South Africa Key factors contributing to postgraduate students’ success: Making a case for Coronavirus-19 and beyond Mind the gap – industry perceptions about postgraduate studies in the discipline of design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1