{"title":"资产管理中边际风险贡献估计的有限差分方法","authors":"M. Olschewsky, Stefan Lüdemann, Thorsten Poddig","doi":"10.21314/JOR.2016.334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decomposition of portfolio risks in terms of the underlying assets, which are extremely important for risk budgeting, asset allocation and risk monitoring, is well described by risk contributions. However, risk contributions cannot be calculated analytically for a considerable number of the risk models used in practice. We therefore study the use of finite difference methods for estimating risk contributions. We find that for practically relevant setups the additional estimation errors of the finite difference formulas are negligibly small. Since finite difference methods work for complex risk models and are independent of decisions about underlying distributions, we suggest the use of finite difference methods as the standard procedure for estimating risk contributions. As an application, we consider a general risk model that fits a kernel density estimation to the historical asset return distribution combined with a finite difference method in order to arrive at the risk contributions. It turns out that this general risk model combined with a finite difference method for calculating risk contributions works well in terms of estimation error.","PeriodicalId":46697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite Difference Methods for Estimating Marginal Risk Contributions in Asset Management\",\"authors\":\"M. Olschewsky, Stefan Lüdemann, Thorsten Poddig\",\"doi\":\"10.21314/JOR.2016.334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The decomposition of portfolio risks in terms of the underlying assets, which are extremely important for risk budgeting, asset allocation and risk monitoring, is well described by risk contributions. However, risk contributions cannot be calculated analytically for a considerable number of the risk models used in practice. We therefore study the use of finite difference methods for estimating risk contributions. We find that for practically relevant setups the additional estimation errors of the finite difference formulas are negligibly small. Since finite difference methods work for complex risk models and are independent of decisions about underlying distributions, we suggest the use of finite difference methods as the standard procedure for estimating risk contributions. As an application, we consider a general risk model that fits a kernel density estimation to the historical asset return distribution combined with a finite difference method in order to arrive at the risk contributions. It turns out that this general risk model combined with a finite difference method for calculating risk contributions works well in terms of estimation error.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Risk\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2016.334\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.2016.334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Finite Difference Methods for Estimating Marginal Risk Contributions in Asset Management
The decomposition of portfolio risks in terms of the underlying assets, which are extremely important for risk budgeting, asset allocation and risk monitoring, is well described by risk contributions. However, risk contributions cannot be calculated analytically for a considerable number of the risk models used in practice. We therefore study the use of finite difference methods for estimating risk contributions. We find that for practically relevant setups the additional estimation errors of the finite difference formulas are negligibly small. Since finite difference methods work for complex risk models and are independent of decisions about underlying distributions, we suggest the use of finite difference methods as the standard procedure for estimating risk contributions. As an application, we consider a general risk model that fits a kernel density estimation to the historical asset return distribution combined with a finite difference method in order to arrive at the risk contributions. It turns out that this general risk model combined with a finite difference method for calculating risk contributions works well in terms of estimation error.
期刊介绍:
This international peer-reviewed journal publishes a broad range of original research papers which aim to further develop understanding of financial risk management. As the only publication devoted exclusively to theoretical and empirical studies in financial risk management, The Journal of Risk promotes far-reaching research on the latest innovations in this field, with particular focus on the measurement, management and analysis of financial risk. The Journal of Risk is particularly interested in papers on the following topics: Risk management regulations and their implications, Risk capital allocation and risk budgeting, Efficient evaluation of risk measures under increasingly complex and realistic model assumptions, Impact of risk measurement on portfolio allocation, Theoretical development of alternative risk measures, Hedging (linear and non-linear) under alternative risk measures, Financial market model risk, Estimation of volatility and unanticipated jumps, Capital allocation.