归还被拆除文化财产的“第一次审判”

T. Scovazzi
{"title":"归还被拆除文化财产的“第一次审判”","authors":"T. Scovazzi","doi":"10.18800/agenda.201201.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A rule of customary international law is commonly believed to consist in «a general practice accepted as law», as stated in Art. 38, para. 1, b, of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. In studying the process that leads to the creation of a new customary rule where no rule existed or the replacement of an old rule by a new one, particularly important is the «first time» instance, that is the case when the need for a new regime is publicly manifested for the first time. As such a need cannot be grounded on legal precedents, for the simple reason that they do not exist, reasons of moral, political, social, economic or cultural character are often put forward to explain the innovation and make it acceptable for other States.","PeriodicalId":33271,"journal":{"name":"Agenda Internacional","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The «First Time Instance» as Regards Restitution of Removed Cultural Properties\",\"authors\":\"T. Scovazzi\",\"doi\":\"10.18800/agenda.201201.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A rule of customary international law is commonly believed to consist in «a general practice accepted as law», as stated in Art. 38, para. 1, b, of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. In studying the process that leads to the creation of a new customary rule where no rule existed or the replacement of an old rule by a new one, particularly important is the «first time» instance, that is the case when the need for a new regime is publicly manifested for the first time. As such a need cannot be grounded on legal precedents, for the simple reason that they do not exist, reasons of moral, political, social, economic or cultural character are often put forward to explain the innovation and make it acceptable for other States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agenda Internacional\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agenda Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18800/agenda.201201.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agenda Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/agenda.201201.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如第38条第2款所述,习惯国际法规则通常被认为是“被接受为法律的一般做法”。《国际法院规约》第1、b条。在研究导致在不存在规则的情况下产生新的习惯规则或以新规则取代旧规则的过程时,特别重要的是“第一次”实例,即第一次公开表明需要建立新制度的情况。由于这种需要不能建立在法律先例的基础上,原因很简单,因为它们不存在,因此经常提出道德、政治、社会、经济或文化性质的理由来解释这种创新,并使其为其他国家所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The «First Time Instance» as Regards Restitution of Removed Cultural Properties
A rule of customary international law is commonly believed to consist in «a general practice accepted as law», as stated in Art. 38, para. 1, b, of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. In studying the process that leads to the creation of a new customary rule where no rule existed or the replacement of an old rule by a new one, particularly important is the «first time» instance, that is the case when the need for a new regime is publicly manifested for the first time. As such a need cannot be grounded on legal precedents, for the simple reason that they do not exist, reasons of moral, political, social, economic or cultural character are often put forward to explain the innovation and make it acceptable for other States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
¿Qué hacer cuando las partes callan? Modernizando las reglas peruanas sobre el derecho aplicable a los contratos internacionales a falta de elección de las partes a la luz de las nuevas tendencias del derecho internacional privado Nada se destruye, todo se transforma: la exigibilidad de la obligación de reparar en el marco de una sucesión de Estados APEC. De las metas de Bogor a la visión de Putrajaya 2040 El recurso al estado de emergencia por el Gobierno peruano durante la pandemia y su conformidad con el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos Régimen patrimonial de los matrimonios internacionales. Ley aplicable y pactos permitidos en el derecho internacional privado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1