再一次的双重:与J.布劳和J.布兰金索普的答复

Gary A. Rendsburg
{"title":"再一次的双重:与J.布劳和J.布兰金索普的答复","authors":"Gary A. Rendsburg","doi":"10.2143/ANES.38.0.1091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twenty years ago I proposed that the numerous cases of the pronouns 'tm, hm, -km and -hm with feminine dual antecedents, as well as the use of masculine verbs with feminine dual subjects, are evidence of the vestigial use of dual pronouns and verbs in Biblical Hebrew. In addition, I argued that the large concentration of such forms in P can be used as evidence for the early date of the Priestly source. Joshua Blau responded with an article arguing that these examples are not evidence for the dual, but rather are part of the larger picture of the drift for the masculine to replace the feminine in Hebrew and in other Semitic languages. More recently, Joseph Blenkinsopp wrote an article challenging my use of these dual forms for dating the Priestly source. The present article responds to both Blau and Blenkinsopp, adding the evidence of computer-aided analysis of Biblical Hebrew and presenting afresh the position that P is indeed pre-exilic.","PeriodicalId":80328,"journal":{"name":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","volume":"38 1","pages":"28-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.38.0.1091","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Once more the dual: With replies to J. Blau and J. Blenkinsopp\",\"authors\":\"Gary A. Rendsburg\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ANES.38.0.1091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Twenty years ago I proposed that the numerous cases of the pronouns 'tm, hm, -km and -hm with feminine dual antecedents, as well as the use of masculine verbs with feminine dual subjects, are evidence of the vestigial use of dual pronouns and verbs in Biblical Hebrew. In addition, I argued that the large concentration of such forms in P can be used as evidence for the early date of the Priestly source. Joshua Blau responded with an article arguing that these examples are not evidence for the dual, but rather are part of the larger picture of the drift for the masculine to replace the feminine in Hebrew and in other Semitic languages. More recently, Joseph Blenkinsopp wrote an article challenging my use of these dual forms for dating the Priestly source. The present article responds to both Blau and Blenkinsopp, adding the evidence of computer-aided analysis of Biblical Hebrew and presenting afresh the position that P is indeed pre-exilic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"28-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.38.0.1091\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.38.0.1091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.38.0.1091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

20年前,我曾提出,代词tm, hm, -km和-hm带有女性双重先行词的大量案例,以及阳性动词带有女性双重主语的使用,都是圣经希伯来语中双重代词和动词使用残余的证据。此外,我认为P中这些形式的大量集中可以作为祭司来源早期日期的证据。约书亚·布劳(Joshua Blau)在一篇文章中回应说,这些例子并不是双重的证据,而是希伯来语和其他闪米特语中男性取代女性的更大趋势的一部分。最近,Joseph Blenkinsopp写了一篇文章,质疑我使用这种双重形式来确定祭司的来源。本文回应了Blau和Blenkinsopp的观点,增加了计算机辅助分析圣经希伯来语的证据,并重新提出了P确实是被流放前的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Once more the dual: With replies to J. Blau and J. Blenkinsopp
Twenty years ago I proposed that the numerous cases of the pronouns 'tm, hm, -km and -hm with feminine dual antecedents, as well as the use of masculine verbs with feminine dual subjects, are evidence of the vestigial use of dual pronouns and verbs in Biblical Hebrew. In addition, I argued that the large concentration of such forms in P can be used as evidence for the early date of the Priestly source. Joshua Blau responded with an article arguing that these examples are not evidence for the dual, but rather are part of the larger picture of the drift for the masculine to replace the feminine in Hebrew and in other Semitic languages. More recently, Joseph Blenkinsopp wrote an article challenging my use of these dual forms for dating the Priestly source. The present article responds to both Blau and Blenkinsopp, adding the evidence of computer-aided analysis of Biblical Hebrew and presenting afresh the position that P is indeed pre-exilic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vegetation, Fire and Grazing Dynamics in Mtskheta, Georgia, and their Implications for Human Economic Strategies since 2000 BC The king and the land: a geography of royal power in the Biblical world The Present-Future in Amorite: A Rejoinder Herodotus 2.61.2 and the Mwdon-of caromemphitae Archaeological Investigations at Chobareti in southern Georgia, the Caucasus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1