{"title":"解读狄奥多斯铭文:对一世纪耶路撒冷犹太教堂铭文和e·p·桑德斯“普通犹太教”的一些思考。","authors":"Matthew J. Martin","doi":"10.2143/ANES.39.0.501780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The significance of the Theodotos inscription, discovered upon the Ophel in Jerusalem early last century, cannot be underestimated. It still remains our only piece of incontrovertible archaeological/epigraphical evidence for the existence of synagogues in pre-70 C. E. Jerusalem. It is, however, precisely the unique character of the Theodotos inscription which requires that heightened caution be exercised in its interpretation. In particular, the degree to which this inscription may be considered to be representative evidence for the first century synagogue in Jerusalem and Palestine must be carefully considered. In other words, it is necessary to ensure that that historical methodological commonplace, the necessity for close, contextual analysis, is carefully adhered to in any attempt to determine the significance of the Theodotos inscription for the reconstruction of first century Judaism.","PeriodicalId":80328,"journal":{"name":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","volume":"39 1","pages":"160-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.39.0.501780","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpreting the Theodotos inscription: Some reflections on a first century Jerusalem synagogue inscription and E. P. Sanders' 'common Judaism'.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ANES.39.0.501780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The significance of the Theodotos inscription, discovered upon the Ophel in Jerusalem early last century, cannot be underestimated. It still remains our only piece of incontrovertible archaeological/epigraphical evidence for the existence of synagogues in pre-70 C. E. Jerusalem. It is, however, precisely the unique character of the Theodotos inscription which requires that heightened caution be exercised in its interpretation. In particular, the degree to which this inscription may be considered to be representative evidence for the first century synagogue in Jerusalem and Palestine must be carefully considered. In other words, it is necessary to ensure that that historical methodological commonplace, the necessity for close, contextual analysis, is carefully adhered to in any attempt to determine the significance of the Theodotos inscription for the reconstruction of first century Judaism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"160-181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.39.0.501780\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.39.0.501780\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.39.0.501780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interpreting the Theodotos inscription: Some reflections on a first century Jerusalem synagogue inscription and E. P. Sanders' 'common Judaism'.
The significance of the Theodotos inscription, discovered upon the Ophel in Jerusalem early last century, cannot be underestimated. It still remains our only piece of incontrovertible archaeological/epigraphical evidence for the existence of synagogues in pre-70 C. E. Jerusalem. It is, however, precisely the unique character of the Theodotos inscription which requires that heightened caution be exercised in its interpretation. In particular, the degree to which this inscription may be considered to be representative evidence for the first century synagogue in Jerusalem and Palestine must be carefully considered. In other words, it is necessary to ensure that that historical methodological commonplace, the necessity for close, contextual analysis, is carefully adhered to in any attempt to determine the significance of the Theodotos inscription for the reconstruction of first century Judaism.