{"title":"伊比利亚外高加索地区的长期跨文化关系与国家形成:一个编年史的视角","authors":"J. Morin","doi":"10.2143/ANES.41.0.562923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that Iberia did not form in a vacuum, nor as an imitation of more advanced systems, but was the result of long-term (fifth-second century B. C.) bilateral relationships between local elites and the Persians. Iberia arose to preserve the standing of elites after the collapse of Seleucid Persia I .","PeriodicalId":80328,"journal":{"name":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","volume":"41 1","pages":"108-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.41.0.562923","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term cross-cultural relations and state-formation in Transcaucasian Iberia: An Annaliste perspective\",\"authors\":\"J. Morin\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ANES.41.0.562923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that Iberia did not form in a vacuum, nor as an imitation of more advanced systems, but was the result of long-term (fifth-second century B. C.) bilateral relationships between local elites and the Persians. Iberia arose to preserve the standing of elites after the collapse of Seleucid Persia I .\",\"PeriodicalId\":80328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"108-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.41.0.562923\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.41.0.562923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.41.0.562923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term cross-cultural relations and state-formation in Transcaucasian Iberia: An Annaliste perspective
This paper argues that Iberia did not form in a vacuum, nor as an imitation of more advanced systems, but was the result of long-term (fifth-second century B. C.) bilateral relationships between local elites and the Persians. Iberia arose to preserve the standing of elites after the collapse of Seleucid Persia I .