论阿拉姆语中第三人称预述代词l-/n与埃塞俄比亚语的类似

A. Rubin
{"title":"论阿拉姆语中第三人称预述代词l-/n与埃塞俄比亚语的类似","authors":"A. Rubin","doi":"10.2143/ANES.44.0.2022823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The origins of the third person preformatives I- and n- in the Eastern Aramaic dialects and in Biblical Aramaic have never been satisfactorily explained. In this paper, we will re-examine all of the evidence as we survey four centuries of previous attempts to tackle this issue. Though we will conclude that the current prevailing theory is in fact the correct one, we will demonstrate for the first time exactly why it is correct (and why other theories cannot be correct) and explain why this development took place in these dialects. We will also consider a similar development in Tigre in order to lend further support to our conclusions.","PeriodicalId":80328,"journal":{"name":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","volume":"44 1","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.44.0.2022823","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Third Person Preformative l-/n-in Aramaic, and an Ethiopic Parallel\",\"authors\":\"A. Rubin\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ANES.44.0.2022823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The origins of the third person preformatives I- and n- in the Eastern Aramaic dialects and in Biblical Aramaic have never been satisfactorily explained. In this paper, we will re-examine all of the evidence as we survey four centuries of previous attempts to tackle this issue. Though we will conclude that the current prevailing theory is in fact the correct one, we will demonstrate for the first time exactly why it is correct (and why other theories cannot be correct) and explain why this development took place in these dialects. We will also consider a similar development in Tigre in order to lend further support to our conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"1-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.44.0.2022823\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.44.0.2022823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.44.0.2022823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在东部阿拉姆语方言和圣经阿拉姆语中,第三人称前置语I-和n-的起源从未得到令人满意的解释。在本文中,我们将重新审视所有的证据,因为我们调查了四个世纪以前解决这个问题的尝试。虽然我们将得出目前流行的理论实际上是正确的结论,但我们将首次确切地证明为什么它是正确的(以及为什么其他理论不可能是正确的),并解释为什么这种发展发生在这些方言中。我们还将考虑Tigre的类似发展,以便进一步支持我们的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Third Person Preformative l-/n-in Aramaic, and an Ethiopic Parallel
The origins of the third person preformatives I- and n- in the Eastern Aramaic dialects and in Biblical Aramaic have never been satisfactorily explained. In this paper, we will re-examine all of the evidence as we survey four centuries of previous attempts to tackle this issue. Though we will conclude that the current prevailing theory is in fact the correct one, we will demonstrate for the first time exactly why it is correct (and why other theories cannot be correct) and explain why this development took place in these dialects. We will also consider a similar development in Tigre in order to lend further support to our conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vegetation, Fire and Grazing Dynamics in Mtskheta, Georgia, and their Implications for Human Economic Strategies since 2000 BC The king and the land: a geography of royal power in the Biblical world The Present-Future in Amorite: A Rejoinder Herodotus 2.61.2 and the Mwdon-of caromemphitae Archaeological Investigations at Chobareti in southern Georgia, the Caucasus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1