{"title":"从Kilise Tepe看铁器时代的年表","authors":"J. Postgate","doi":"10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from the Late Bronze to Iron Age stratigraphic sequence at Kilise Tepe in the Goksu valley, this contribution explores some of the difficulties encountered fixing it in time. One major problem centres round the cessation of Hittite political control: the historical sources suggest that this would have been in the early twelfth century, and both Level IIc and lid, which is datable to around 1170 BC on the basis ofLH IIIc Mycenaean ceramics, were destroyed about this time. Yet stratigraphy indicates that the major change in the material culture of Kilise Tepe occurred significantly earlier, at the initial foundation of the Level II Stele Building on a different alignment from the Level III architecture, which is characterized by recognizably 'Hittite' ceramics. As for later in the Iron Age, our assemblage of'White Painted IV' ceramics proves not to provide the chronological fixed point one might hope for, because of the uncertainties which affect the dating of similar wares on Cyprus and at Tarsus; and before this, although alongside developments in the locally produced wares we can see imports or imitations of other Eastern Mediterranean traditions, they too fail to provide fixed points in the absence of radiocarbon or dendrochronological precisions.","PeriodicalId":80328,"journal":{"name":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","volume":"45 1","pages":"166-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033169","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Chronology of the Iron Age seen from Kilise Tepe\",\"authors\":\"J. Postgate\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Starting from the Late Bronze to Iron Age stratigraphic sequence at Kilise Tepe in the Goksu valley, this contribution explores some of the difficulties encountered fixing it in time. One major problem centres round the cessation of Hittite political control: the historical sources suggest that this would have been in the early twelfth century, and both Level IIc and lid, which is datable to around 1170 BC on the basis ofLH IIIc Mycenaean ceramics, were destroyed about this time. Yet stratigraphy indicates that the major change in the material culture of Kilise Tepe occurred significantly earlier, at the initial foundation of the Level II Stele Building on a different alignment from the Level III architecture, which is characterized by recognizably 'Hittite' ceramics. As for later in the Iron Age, our assemblage of'White Painted IV' ceramics proves not to provide the chronological fixed point one might hope for, because of the uncertainties which affect the dating of similar wares on Cyprus and at Tarsus; and before this, although alongside developments in the locally produced wares we can see imports or imitations of other Eastern Mediterranean traditions, they too fail to provide fixed points in the absence of radiocarbon or dendrochronological precisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"166-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033169\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abr-Nahrain : an annual under the auspices of the Department of Semitic Studies, University of Melbourne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ANES.45.0.2033169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

从Goksu山谷Kilise Tepe的青铜晚期到铁器时代地层序列开始,本文探讨了及时修复它所遇到的一些困难。一个主要的问题集中在赫梯人政治控制的停止:历史资料表明,这可能发生在12世纪初,根据迈锡尼陶瓷的历史,Level ii和lid可以追溯到公元前1170年左右,大约在这个时候被摧毁。然而,地层学表明,基利斯特佩物质文化的重大变化发生得更早,在第二级石碑建筑的最初基础上,与第三级建筑的排列方式不同,其特征是明显的“赫梯”陶瓷。至于后来的铁器时代,我们的“白漆IV”陶瓷的集合证明没有提供人们可能希望的时间上的固定点,因为不确定因素影响了塞浦路斯和塔尔苏斯类似陶器的年代;在此之前,尽管在当地生产的陶器的发展中,我们可以看到其他东地中海传统的进口或模仿,但它们也无法在缺乏放射性碳或树木年代学精度的情况下提供固定的点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Chronology of the Iron Age seen from Kilise Tepe
Starting from the Late Bronze to Iron Age stratigraphic sequence at Kilise Tepe in the Goksu valley, this contribution explores some of the difficulties encountered fixing it in time. One major problem centres round the cessation of Hittite political control: the historical sources suggest that this would have been in the early twelfth century, and both Level IIc and lid, which is datable to around 1170 BC on the basis ofLH IIIc Mycenaean ceramics, were destroyed about this time. Yet stratigraphy indicates that the major change in the material culture of Kilise Tepe occurred significantly earlier, at the initial foundation of the Level II Stele Building on a different alignment from the Level III architecture, which is characterized by recognizably 'Hittite' ceramics. As for later in the Iron Age, our assemblage of'White Painted IV' ceramics proves not to provide the chronological fixed point one might hope for, because of the uncertainties which affect the dating of similar wares on Cyprus and at Tarsus; and before this, although alongside developments in the locally produced wares we can see imports or imitations of other Eastern Mediterranean traditions, they too fail to provide fixed points in the absence of radiocarbon or dendrochronological precisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vegetation, Fire and Grazing Dynamics in Mtskheta, Georgia, and their Implications for Human Economic Strategies since 2000 BC The king and the land: a geography of royal power in the Biblical world The Present-Future in Amorite: A Rejoinder Herodotus 2.61.2 and the Mwdon-of caromemphitae Archaeological Investigations at Chobareti in southern Georgia, the Caucasus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1