基于高斯差分和小波差分的人体动作识别

IF 7.7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Big Data Mining and Analytics Pub Date : 2023-04-07 DOI:10.26599/BDMA.2022.9020040
Gopampallikar Vinoda Reddy;Kongara Deepika;Lakshmanan Malliga;Duraivelu Hemanand;Chinnadurai Senthilkumar;Subburayalu Gopalakrishnan;Yousef Farhaoui
{"title":"基于高斯差分和小波差分的人体动作识别","authors":"Gopampallikar Vinoda Reddy;Kongara Deepika;Lakshmanan Malliga;Duraivelu Hemanand;Chinnadurai Senthilkumar;Subburayalu Gopalakrishnan;Yousef Farhaoui","doi":"10.26599/BDMA.2022.9020040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human Action Recognition (HAR) attempts to recognize the human action from images and videos. The major challenge in HAR is the design of an action descriptor that makes the HAR system robust for different environments. A novel action descriptor is proposed in this study, based on two independent spatial and spectral filters. The proposed descriptor uses a Difference of Gaussian (DoG) filter to extract scale-invariant features and a Difference of Wavelet (DoW) filter to extract spectral information. To create a composite feature vector for a particular test action picture, the Discriminant of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) features are combined. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), a widely used dimensionality reduction technique, is also used to eliminate duplicate data. Finally, a closest neighbor method is used to classify the dataset. Weizmann and UCF 11 datasets were used to run extensive simulations of the suggested strategy, and the accuracy assessed after the simulations were run on Weizmann datasets for five-fold cross validation is shown to perform well. The average accuracy of DoG + DoW is observed as 83.6635% while the average accuracy of Discrinanat of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 80.2312% and 77.4215%, respectively. The average accuracy measured after the simulation of proposed methods over UCF 11 action dataset for five-fold cross validation DoG + DoW is observed as 62.5231% while the average accuracy of Difference of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 60.3214% and 58.1247%, respectively. From the above accuracy observations, the accuracy of Weizmann is high compared to the accuracy of UCF 11, hence verifying the effectiveness in the improvisation of recognition accuracy.","PeriodicalId":52355,"journal":{"name":"Big Data Mining and Analytics","volume":"6 3","pages":"336-346"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8254253/10097649/10097655.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Action Recognition Using Difference of Gaussian and Difference of Wavelet\",\"authors\":\"Gopampallikar Vinoda Reddy;Kongara Deepika;Lakshmanan Malliga;Duraivelu Hemanand;Chinnadurai Senthilkumar;Subburayalu Gopalakrishnan;Yousef Farhaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.26599/BDMA.2022.9020040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human Action Recognition (HAR) attempts to recognize the human action from images and videos. The major challenge in HAR is the design of an action descriptor that makes the HAR system robust for different environments. A novel action descriptor is proposed in this study, based on two independent spatial and spectral filters. The proposed descriptor uses a Difference of Gaussian (DoG) filter to extract scale-invariant features and a Difference of Wavelet (DoW) filter to extract spectral information. To create a composite feature vector for a particular test action picture, the Discriminant of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) features are combined. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), a widely used dimensionality reduction technique, is also used to eliminate duplicate data. Finally, a closest neighbor method is used to classify the dataset. Weizmann and UCF 11 datasets were used to run extensive simulations of the suggested strategy, and the accuracy assessed after the simulations were run on Weizmann datasets for five-fold cross validation is shown to perform well. The average accuracy of DoG + DoW is observed as 83.6635% while the average accuracy of Discrinanat of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 80.2312% and 77.4215%, respectively. The average accuracy measured after the simulation of proposed methods over UCF 11 action dataset for five-fold cross validation DoG + DoW is observed as 62.5231% while the average accuracy of Difference of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 60.3214% and 58.1247%, respectively. From the above accuracy observations, the accuracy of Weizmann is high compared to the accuracy of UCF 11, hence verifying the effectiveness in the improvisation of recognition accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Big Data Mining and Analytics\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"336-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8254253/10097649/10097655.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Big Data Mining and Analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10097655/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data Mining and Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10097655/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人类动作识别(HAR)试图从图像和视频中识别人类动作。HAR中的主要挑战是设计一个动作描述符,使HAR系统对不同的环境具有鲁棒性。基于两个独立的空间滤波器和频谱滤波器,本文提出了一种新的动作描述符。该描述符使用高斯差分(DoG)滤波器提取尺度不变特征,使用小波差分(DoW)滤波器提取光谱信息。为了为特定的测试动作画面创建复合特征向量,将高斯判别(DoG)和小波差分(DoW)特征相结合。线性判别分析(LDA)是一种广泛使用的降维技术,也用于消除重复数据。最后,使用最近邻方法对数据集进行分类。Weizmann和UCF11数据集用于对所建议的策略进行广泛的模拟,在Weizmann数据集上进行五次交叉验证后评估的准确性表现良好。DoG+DoW的平均精度为83.6635%,而Guassian的Discrinanat(DoG)和Wavelet的Difference(DoW)的平均精度分别为80.2312%和77.4215%。在五次交叉验证DoG+DoW的UCF11动作数据集上模拟所提出的方法后测得的平均准确度为62.5231%,而高斯差(DoG)和小波差(DoW)的平均准确率分别为60.3214%和58.1247%。根据上述精度观察,与UCF11的精度相比,Weizmann的精度较高,因此验证了识别精度即兴发挥的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human Action Recognition Using Difference of Gaussian and Difference of Wavelet
Human Action Recognition (HAR) attempts to recognize the human action from images and videos. The major challenge in HAR is the design of an action descriptor that makes the HAR system robust for different environments. A novel action descriptor is proposed in this study, based on two independent spatial and spectral filters. The proposed descriptor uses a Difference of Gaussian (DoG) filter to extract scale-invariant features and a Difference of Wavelet (DoW) filter to extract spectral information. To create a composite feature vector for a particular test action picture, the Discriminant of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) features are combined. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), a widely used dimensionality reduction technique, is also used to eliminate duplicate data. Finally, a closest neighbor method is used to classify the dataset. Weizmann and UCF 11 datasets were used to run extensive simulations of the suggested strategy, and the accuracy assessed after the simulations were run on Weizmann datasets for five-fold cross validation is shown to perform well. The average accuracy of DoG + DoW is observed as 83.6635% while the average accuracy of Discrinanat of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 80.2312% and 77.4215%, respectively. The average accuracy measured after the simulation of proposed methods over UCF 11 action dataset for five-fold cross validation DoG + DoW is observed as 62.5231% while the average accuracy of Difference of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 60.3214% and 58.1247%, respectively. From the above accuracy observations, the accuracy of Weizmann is high compared to the accuracy of UCF 11, hence verifying the effectiveness in the improvisation of recognition accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Big Data Mining and Analytics
Big Data Mining and Analytics Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
2.20%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Big Data Mining and Analytics, a publication by Tsinghua University Press, presents groundbreaking research in the field of big data research and its applications. This comprehensive book delves into the exploration and analysis of vast amounts of data from diverse sources to uncover hidden patterns, correlations, insights, and knowledge. Featuring the latest developments, research issues, and solutions, this book offers valuable insights into the world of big data. It provides a deep understanding of data mining techniques, data analytics, and their practical applications. Big Data Mining and Analytics has gained significant recognition and is indexed and abstracted in esteemed platforms such as ESCI, EI, Scopus, DBLP Computer Science, Google Scholar, INSPEC, CSCD, DOAJ, CNKI, and more. With its wealth of information and its ability to transform the way we perceive and utilize data, this book is a must-read for researchers, professionals, and anyone interested in the field of big data analytics.
期刊最新文献
Contents Front Cover Incremental Data Stream Classification with Adaptive Multi-Task Multi-View Learning Attention-Based CNN Fusion Model for Emotion Recognition During Walking Using Discrete Wavelet Transform on EEG and Inertial Signals Gender-Based Analysis of User Reactions to Facebook Posts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1