{"title":"基于高斯差分和小波差分的人体动作识别","authors":"Gopampallikar Vinoda Reddy;Kongara Deepika;Lakshmanan Malliga;Duraivelu Hemanand;Chinnadurai Senthilkumar;Subburayalu Gopalakrishnan;Yousef Farhaoui","doi":"10.26599/BDMA.2022.9020040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human Action Recognition (HAR) attempts to recognize the human action from images and videos. The major challenge in HAR is the design of an action descriptor that makes the HAR system robust for different environments. A novel action descriptor is proposed in this study, based on two independent spatial and spectral filters. The proposed descriptor uses a Difference of Gaussian (DoG) filter to extract scale-invariant features and a Difference of Wavelet (DoW) filter to extract spectral information. To create a composite feature vector for a particular test action picture, the Discriminant of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) features are combined. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), a widely used dimensionality reduction technique, is also used to eliminate duplicate data. Finally, a closest neighbor method is used to classify the dataset. Weizmann and UCF 11 datasets were used to run extensive simulations of the suggested strategy, and the accuracy assessed after the simulations were run on Weizmann datasets for five-fold cross validation is shown to perform well. The average accuracy of DoG + DoW is observed as 83.6635% while the average accuracy of Discrinanat of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 80.2312% and 77.4215%, respectively. The average accuracy measured after the simulation of proposed methods over UCF 11 action dataset for five-fold cross validation DoG + DoW is observed as 62.5231% while the average accuracy of Difference of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 60.3214% and 58.1247%, respectively. From the above accuracy observations, the accuracy of Weizmann is high compared to the accuracy of UCF 11, hence verifying the effectiveness in the improvisation of recognition accuracy.","PeriodicalId":52355,"journal":{"name":"Big Data Mining and Analytics","volume":"6 3","pages":"336-346"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8254253/10097649/10097655.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Action Recognition Using Difference of Gaussian and Difference of Wavelet\",\"authors\":\"Gopampallikar Vinoda Reddy;Kongara Deepika;Lakshmanan Malliga;Duraivelu Hemanand;Chinnadurai Senthilkumar;Subburayalu Gopalakrishnan;Yousef Farhaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.26599/BDMA.2022.9020040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human Action Recognition (HAR) attempts to recognize the human action from images and videos. The major challenge in HAR is the design of an action descriptor that makes the HAR system robust for different environments. A novel action descriptor is proposed in this study, based on two independent spatial and spectral filters. The proposed descriptor uses a Difference of Gaussian (DoG) filter to extract scale-invariant features and a Difference of Wavelet (DoW) filter to extract spectral information. To create a composite feature vector for a particular test action picture, the Discriminant of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) features are combined. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), a widely used dimensionality reduction technique, is also used to eliminate duplicate data. Finally, a closest neighbor method is used to classify the dataset. Weizmann and UCF 11 datasets were used to run extensive simulations of the suggested strategy, and the accuracy assessed after the simulations were run on Weizmann datasets for five-fold cross validation is shown to perform well. The average accuracy of DoG + DoW is observed as 83.6635% while the average accuracy of Discrinanat of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 80.2312% and 77.4215%, respectively. The average accuracy measured after the simulation of proposed methods over UCF 11 action dataset for five-fold cross validation DoG + DoW is observed as 62.5231% while the average accuracy of Difference of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 60.3214% and 58.1247%, respectively. From the above accuracy observations, the accuracy of Weizmann is high compared to the accuracy of UCF 11, hence verifying the effectiveness in the improvisation of recognition accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Big Data Mining and Analytics\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"336-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8254253/10097649/10097655.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Big Data Mining and Analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10097655/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data Mining and Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10097655/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Human Action Recognition Using Difference of Gaussian and Difference of Wavelet
Human Action Recognition (HAR) attempts to recognize the human action from images and videos. The major challenge in HAR is the design of an action descriptor that makes the HAR system robust for different environments. A novel action descriptor is proposed in this study, based on two independent spatial and spectral filters. The proposed descriptor uses a Difference of Gaussian (DoG) filter to extract scale-invariant features and a Difference of Wavelet (DoW) filter to extract spectral information. To create a composite feature vector for a particular test action picture, the Discriminant of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) features are combined. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), a widely used dimensionality reduction technique, is also used to eliminate duplicate data. Finally, a closest neighbor method is used to classify the dataset. Weizmann and UCF 11 datasets were used to run extensive simulations of the suggested strategy, and the accuracy assessed after the simulations were run on Weizmann datasets for five-fold cross validation is shown to perform well. The average accuracy of DoG + DoW is observed as 83.6635% while the average accuracy of Discrinanat of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 80.2312% and 77.4215%, respectively. The average accuracy measured after the simulation of proposed methods over UCF 11 action dataset for five-fold cross validation DoG + DoW is observed as 62.5231% while the average accuracy of Difference of Guassian (DoG) and Difference of Wavelet (DoW) is observed as 60.3214% and 58.1247%, respectively. From the above accuracy observations, the accuracy of Weizmann is high compared to the accuracy of UCF 11, hence verifying the effectiveness in the improvisation of recognition accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Big Data Mining and Analytics, a publication by Tsinghua University Press, presents groundbreaking research in the field of big data research and its applications. This comprehensive book delves into the exploration and analysis of vast amounts of data from diverse sources to uncover hidden patterns, correlations, insights, and knowledge.
Featuring the latest developments, research issues, and solutions, this book offers valuable insights into the world of big data. It provides a deep understanding of data mining techniques, data analytics, and their practical applications.
Big Data Mining and Analytics has gained significant recognition and is indexed and abstracted in esteemed platforms such as ESCI, EI, Scopus, DBLP Computer Science, Google Scholar, INSPEC, CSCD, DOAJ, CNKI, and more.
With its wealth of information and its ability to transform the way we perceive and utilize data, this book is a must-read for researchers, professionals, and anyone interested in the field of big data analytics.