森林砍伐和2001-2004年VRAE古柯种植者公地悲剧:2001-2004

Eduardo Bedoya Garland
{"title":"森林砍伐和2001-2004年VRAE古柯种植者公地悲剧:2001-2004","authors":"Eduardo Bedoya Garland","doi":"10.18800/ESPACIOYDESARROLLO.201601.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forests at the tropical Valley of the Apurimac and Ene rivers (VRAE), the second coca-growing region of Peru, are public common resources and nevertheless privately managed mainly by coca farmers, without effective State control of such use. The need for survival of the coca farmers, their chrematistic perception of the forest, the cultivation of cocoa ( theobroma cacao ) and land availability are crucial factors influencing the rates of deforestation of primary and secondary forest. Variables such as the legality of land tenure seem to have no influence. However, other institutional factors such as state policies in titling processes and its weakness or absence facilitate the destructive patterns of settlement in the upper forest.  Grassroots organizations of farmers focused on defending coca cultivation and access to credit and technical conditions for their legal products do not consider the defense of the forest as a fundamental aspect of their agenda. Nor were grassroots organizations whose core agenda was the control and monitoring of the management of forest resources. All this leads to argue that the Amazonian farmers are trapped in the \"prisoner's dilemma\". On the one hand, institutional and media pressure press them strongly not to grow coca and on the other hand, if they do not grow coca o clear the forest, others will follow this destructive path and benefit immediately of such a decision","PeriodicalId":30443,"journal":{"name":"Espacio y Desarrollo","volume":"1 1","pages":"75-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La deforestación y la tragedia de los comunes entre los cocaleros del VRAE: 2001-2004\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Bedoya Garland\",\"doi\":\"10.18800/ESPACIOYDESARROLLO.201601.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forests at the tropical Valley of the Apurimac and Ene rivers (VRAE), the second coca-growing region of Peru, are public common resources and nevertheless privately managed mainly by coca farmers, without effective State control of such use. The need for survival of the coca farmers, their chrematistic perception of the forest, the cultivation of cocoa ( theobroma cacao ) and land availability are crucial factors influencing the rates of deforestation of primary and secondary forest. Variables such as the legality of land tenure seem to have no influence. However, other institutional factors such as state policies in titling processes and its weakness or absence facilitate the destructive patterns of settlement in the upper forest.  Grassroots organizations of farmers focused on defending coca cultivation and access to credit and technical conditions for their legal products do not consider the defense of the forest as a fundamental aspect of their agenda. Nor were grassroots organizations whose core agenda was the control and monitoring of the management of forest resources. All this leads to argue that the Amazonian farmers are trapped in the \\\"prisoner's dilemma\\\". On the one hand, institutional and media pressure press them strongly not to grow coca and on the other hand, if they do not grow coca o clear the forest, others will follow this destructive path and benefit immediately of such a decision\",\"PeriodicalId\":30443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Espacio y Desarrollo\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"75-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Espacio y Desarrollo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18800/ESPACIOYDESARROLLO.201601.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Espacio y Desarrollo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/ESPACIOYDESARROLLO.201601.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

热带阿普里马克河和埃内河流域(秘鲁第二个古柯种植区)的森林是公共共同资源,但主要由古柯种植者私人管理,国家对这种使用没有有效管制。古柯农民的生存需要、他们对森林的化学认识、可可种植和土地供应是影响原始森林和次生林毁林率的关键因素。土地所有权的合法性等变数似乎没有影响。然而,其他体制因素,如所有权过程中的国家政策及其薄弱或缺乏,助长了在森林上层定居的破坏性模式。农民的基层组织专注于捍卫古柯种植,并为其合法产品获得信贷和技术条件,而不认为捍卫森林是其议程的一个基本方面。以控制和监测森林资源管理为核心议程的基层组织也不例外。所有这些都导致了亚马逊农民陷入“囚徒困境”的争论。一方面,机构和媒体的压力强烈敦促他们不要种植古柯,另一方面,如果他们不种植古柯或清除森林,其他人将走上这条破坏性的道路,并立即从这样的决定中受益
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La deforestación y la tragedia de los comunes entre los cocaleros del VRAE: 2001-2004
Forests at the tropical Valley of the Apurimac and Ene rivers (VRAE), the second coca-growing region of Peru, are public common resources and nevertheless privately managed mainly by coca farmers, without effective State control of such use. The need for survival of the coca farmers, their chrematistic perception of the forest, the cultivation of cocoa ( theobroma cacao ) and land availability are crucial factors influencing the rates of deforestation of primary and secondary forest. Variables such as the legality of land tenure seem to have no influence. However, other institutional factors such as state policies in titling processes and its weakness or absence facilitate the destructive patterns of settlement in the upper forest.  Grassroots organizations of farmers focused on defending coca cultivation and access to credit and technical conditions for their legal products do not consider the defense of the forest as a fundamental aspect of their agenda. Nor were grassroots organizations whose core agenda was the control and monitoring of the management of forest resources. All this leads to argue that the Amazonian farmers are trapped in the "prisoner's dilemma". On the one hand, institutional and media pressure press them strongly not to grow coca and on the other hand, if they do not grow coca o clear the forest, others will follow this destructive path and benefit immediately of such a decision
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Planificación regional y ordenación territorial: visiones contemporáneas de España y México, Javier Delgadillo, Andreas Hildenbrand & Rubén Garrido, coordinadores ¿Cuál es el efecto del rol de las mujeres rurales sobre la adecuada cloración del agua? Evidencia para el caso peruano Microplásticos en sedimentos fluviales en la cuenca baja del río Rímac, Perú Un bosque urbano en el desierto: conservación de la biodiversidad en Lima, Perú Percepciones del cambio climático y el desarrollo sostenible dentro y fuera de la academia en Cusco, Andes peruanos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1