医疗改革通过医疗补助管理:田纳西州(Tenncare)作为一个案例研究和范例

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Vanderbilt Law Review Pub Date : 2000-01-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.208731
J. Blumstein, F. Sloan
{"title":"医疗改革通过医疗补助管理:田纳西州(Tenncare)作为一个案例研究和范例","authors":"J. Blumstein, F. Sloan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.208731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tennessee's Medicaid managed care program TennCare, is widely regarded as one of the nation's most innovative and comprehensive attempts to reform Medicaid and expand coverage to the uninsured through Medicaid managed care. This paper begins with an analysis of historical developments within the Medicaid program in the early 1990s that forced Tennessee to dramatically change its Medicaid program to cope with rising costs and threatened revenues. It then considers the strategic considerations that led Tennessee to dramatically expand the population covered by its program by nearly half a million uninsured and uninsurable non-Medicaid eligibles to the program (about 38% of total TennCare) in the face of a perceived fiscal crisis. (These strategic considerations would be quite different for a state seeking to adopt a TennCare-like program now since the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 allows states to adopt mandatory managed care for Medicaid without expanding eligibility.) The paper discusses next the waiver application that made possible the creation of TennCare. The paper proceeds with a policy and legal analysis of TennCare's design and implementation, focusing in particular on the political calculus that led Medicaid beneficiary advocates to accept limitations on patient choice in exchange for expansion of population coverage. Next, special characteristics associated with running a public benefits program through the use of state purchasing contracts, and in particular the status of MCOs as state actors, are considered. Finally, the paper reports on original empirical work considering utilization, outcomes, and recipient and provider satisfaction. The paper concludes with an overall favorable evaluation of TennCare, noting that it has expanded access, controlled costs, and not resulted in measurably lower quality of care (although it has resulted in high levels of physician dissatisfaction).","PeriodicalId":47503,"journal":{"name":"Vanderbilt Law Review","volume":"53 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.208731","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Care Reform Through Medicaid Managed Care: Tennessee (Tenncare) as a Case Study and Paradigm\",\"authors\":\"J. Blumstein, F. Sloan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.208731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tennessee's Medicaid managed care program TennCare, is widely regarded as one of the nation's most innovative and comprehensive attempts to reform Medicaid and expand coverage to the uninsured through Medicaid managed care. This paper begins with an analysis of historical developments within the Medicaid program in the early 1990s that forced Tennessee to dramatically change its Medicaid program to cope with rising costs and threatened revenues. It then considers the strategic considerations that led Tennessee to dramatically expand the population covered by its program by nearly half a million uninsured and uninsurable non-Medicaid eligibles to the program (about 38% of total TennCare) in the face of a perceived fiscal crisis. (These strategic considerations would be quite different for a state seeking to adopt a TennCare-like program now since the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 allows states to adopt mandatory managed care for Medicaid without expanding eligibility.) The paper discusses next the waiver application that made possible the creation of TennCare. The paper proceeds with a policy and legal analysis of TennCare's design and implementation, focusing in particular on the political calculus that led Medicaid beneficiary advocates to accept limitations on patient choice in exchange for expansion of population coverage. Next, special characteristics associated with running a public benefits program through the use of state purchasing contracts, and in particular the status of MCOs as state actors, are considered. Finally, the paper reports on original empirical work considering utilization, outcomes, and recipient and provider satisfaction. The paper concludes with an overall favorable evaluation of TennCare, noting that it has expanded access, controlled costs, and not resulted in measurably lower quality of care (although it has resulted in high levels of physician dissatisfaction).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vanderbilt Law Review\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.208731\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vanderbilt Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.208731\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanderbilt Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.208731","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

田纳西州的医疗补助管理式医疗计划TennCare被广泛认为是全国最具创新性和最全面的医疗补助改革尝试之一,并通过医疗补助管理式医疗将保险范围扩大到没有保险的人。本文首先分析了20世纪90年代早期医疗补助计划的历史发展,这迫使田纳西州大幅改变其医疗补助计划,以应对不断上升的成本和受到威胁的收入。然后,它考虑了导致田纳西州在面临明显的财政危机时大幅扩大其计划覆盖的人口的战略考虑,使近50万没有保险和不能投保的非医疗补助资格的人(约占TennCare总人数的38%)符合该计划的条件。(由于1997年的《平衡预算法案》(Balanced Budget Act)允许各州在不扩大医疗补助资格的情况下,对医疗补助采用强制性管理式医疗,因此,对于现在寻求采用类似tenncare计划的州来说,这些战略考虑将是完全不同的。)接下来,本文讨论了使TennCare的创建成为可能的豁免申请。本文继续对TennCare的设计和实施进行政策和法律分析,特别关注导致医疗补助受益人倡导者接受限制患者选择以换取扩大人口覆盖范围的政治计算。接下来,考虑通过使用国家采购合同来运行公共福利项目的特殊特征,特别是mco作为国家行为体的地位。最后,论文报告了原始的实证工作,考虑了利用率、结果、接受者和提供者满意度。论文的结论是对TennCare的总体评价是有利的,指出它扩大了访问范围,控制了成本,并且没有导致明显的护理质量下降(尽管它导致了医生的高度不满)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health Care Reform Through Medicaid Managed Care: Tennessee (Tenncare) as a Case Study and Paradigm
Tennessee's Medicaid managed care program TennCare, is widely regarded as one of the nation's most innovative and comprehensive attempts to reform Medicaid and expand coverage to the uninsured through Medicaid managed care. This paper begins with an analysis of historical developments within the Medicaid program in the early 1990s that forced Tennessee to dramatically change its Medicaid program to cope with rising costs and threatened revenues. It then considers the strategic considerations that led Tennessee to dramatically expand the population covered by its program by nearly half a million uninsured and uninsurable non-Medicaid eligibles to the program (about 38% of total TennCare) in the face of a perceived fiscal crisis. (These strategic considerations would be quite different for a state seeking to adopt a TennCare-like program now since the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 allows states to adopt mandatory managed care for Medicaid without expanding eligibility.) The paper discusses next the waiver application that made possible the creation of TennCare. The paper proceeds with a policy and legal analysis of TennCare's design and implementation, focusing in particular on the political calculus that led Medicaid beneficiary advocates to accept limitations on patient choice in exchange for expansion of population coverage. Next, special characteristics associated with running a public benefits program through the use of state purchasing contracts, and in particular the status of MCOs as state actors, are considered. Finally, the paper reports on original empirical work considering utilization, outcomes, and recipient and provider satisfaction. The paper concludes with an overall favorable evaluation of TennCare, noting that it has expanded access, controlled costs, and not resulted in measurably lower quality of care (although it has resulted in high levels of physician dissatisfaction).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is an online forum designed to advance scholarly discussion. En Banc offers professors, practitioners, students, and others an opportunity to respond to articles printed in the Vanderbilt Law Review. En Banc permits extended discussion of our articles in a way that maintains academic integrity and provides authors with a quicker approach to publication. When reexamining a case “en banc” an appellate court operates at its highest level, with all judges present and participating “on the bench.” We chose the name “En Banc” to capture this spirit of focused review and provide a forum for further dialogue where all can be present and participate.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Wickedness: Managing Complex Systems and Climate Change Formal Justice and Judicial Precedent Rights, Wrongs, and Recourse in the Law of Torts Discovery Cost Allocation, Due Process, and the Constitution's Role in Civil Litigation Judging Law in Election Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1