{"title":"20世纪初喀山哲学家对康德先验主义的理解","authors":"O. Poroshenko","doi":"10.18384/2310-7227-2020-1-67-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Kant's anthropology in its “pure form” was the “Copernican revolution” in the history of European philosophy, it did not become an independent approach in Russian philosophical thought of the 19th-20th centuries. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to analyze the ideas of Kant's transcendentalism widely discussed in the works of some Kazan philosophers of the beginning of the 20th century. This discussion was mostly conducted in the framework of anthropological discourse. Methodology and Approach. The article studies the ideas of V. Ivanovsky, A. Makovelsky and K. Sotonin from the angle of their reception of transcendental concepts in psychological and empirical contexts. 1 © Порошенко О . Ю ., 2020 . ISSN 2072-8530 Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Философские науки 2020 / No 1 68 Results. The analysis showed, that V. Ivanovsky enriched his theory of associationism due to the transcendentalism of I. Kant, A. Makovelsky relied in his procedural theory of “soul” on the Kantian arguments of D. Hume's criticism and K. Sotonin posed a new epistemological problem, complementing Kant’s classification of the objects of judgment. An overview of these concepts is presented in this","PeriodicalId":33732,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UNDERSTANDING OF KANT’S TRANSCENDENTALISM BY KAZAN PHILOSOPHERS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY\",\"authors\":\"O. Poroshenko\",\"doi\":\"10.18384/2310-7227-2020-1-67-74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although Kant's anthropology in its “pure form” was the “Copernican revolution” in the history of European philosophy, it did not become an independent approach in Russian philosophical thought of the 19th-20th centuries. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to analyze the ideas of Kant's transcendentalism widely discussed in the works of some Kazan philosophers of the beginning of the 20th century. This discussion was mostly conducted in the framework of anthropological discourse. Methodology and Approach. The article studies the ideas of V. Ivanovsky, A. Makovelsky and K. Sotonin from the angle of their reception of transcendental concepts in psychological and empirical contexts. 1 © Порошенко О . Ю ., 2020 . ISSN 2072-8530 Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Философские науки 2020 / No 1 68 Results. The analysis showed, that V. Ivanovsky enriched his theory of associationism due to the transcendentalism of I. Kant, A. Makovelsky relied in his procedural theory of “soul” on the Kantian arguments of D. Hume's criticism and K. Sotonin posed a new epistemological problem, complementing Kant’s classification of the objects of judgment. An overview of these concepts is presented in this\",\"PeriodicalId\":33732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2020-1-67-74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta Seriia Filosofskie nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2020-1-67-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
UNDERSTANDING OF KANT’S TRANSCENDENTALISM BY KAZAN PHILOSOPHERS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY
Although Kant's anthropology in its “pure form” was the “Copernican revolution” in the history of European philosophy, it did not become an independent approach in Russian philosophical thought of the 19th-20th centuries. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to analyze the ideas of Kant's transcendentalism widely discussed in the works of some Kazan philosophers of the beginning of the 20th century. This discussion was mostly conducted in the framework of anthropological discourse. Methodology and Approach. The article studies the ideas of V. Ivanovsky, A. Makovelsky and K. Sotonin from the angle of their reception of transcendental concepts in psychological and empirical contexts. 1 © Порошенко О . Ю ., 2020 . ISSN 2072-8530 Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Философские науки 2020 / No 1 68 Results. The analysis showed, that V. Ivanovsky enriched his theory of associationism due to the transcendentalism of I. Kant, A. Makovelsky relied in his procedural theory of “soul” on the Kantian arguments of D. Hume's criticism and K. Sotonin posed a new epistemological problem, complementing Kant’s classification of the objects of judgment. An overview of these concepts is presented in this