选择蔡司丝径尺寸时(简单)节径校准测量不确定度分析

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Transactions of FAMENA Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21278/tof.462040222
V. Šimunović, G. Baršić, Marko Horvatek
{"title":"选择蔡司丝径尺寸时(简单)节径校准测量不确定度分析","authors":"V. Šimunović, G. Baršić, Marko Horvatek","doi":"10.21278/tof.462040222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The calibration of screw thread gauges is a conventional procedure in calibration laboratories and National Metrology Institutes. Proper measurement and reliable uncertainty analysis of the screw thread gauge calibration are complex and demanding tasks. Different technical documents and international standards in screw metrology define calibration categories, explain measurement plans, measuring elements, nominal diameters and their tolerances, and propose guidelines for the measurement uncertainty estimation. Therefore, the first part of this paper provides a detailed overview of different technical documents and international standards in screw thread metrology. The second part of this paper aims to draw attention to critical points of the pitch diameter calibration procedure that lead to a significant increase in measurement uncertainty. Most calibration laboratories do not measure the thread angle during the pitch diameter calibration. Therefore, the selection of the measurement wires can contribute greatly to the measurement uncertainty. Even though the international standards propose the best size wires to avoid this problem, many manufacturers produce measuring wires according to DIN 2269 (Zeiss). In this paper, the authors do simulations of the contribution of measuring wires to the uncertainty in the calibration of the pitch diameter of metric M threads. A simulation is created for each thread gauge according to ISO 1502, and critical threads, in which a significant increase in measurement uncertainty is expected, are highlighted. The authors propose a simple solution for avoiding this unwanted increase in measurement uncertainty of pitch diameter calibration; the solution involves replacing the DIN 2269 (Zeiss) wires with the best-size wires only for the highlighted critical threads.","PeriodicalId":49428,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of FAMENA","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty of (Simple) Pitch Diameter Calibration when Selected Sizes of Zeiss Wires are Used\",\"authors\":\"V. Šimunović, G. Baršić, Marko Horvatek\",\"doi\":\"10.21278/tof.462040222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The calibration of screw thread gauges is a conventional procedure in calibration laboratories and National Metrology Institutes. Proper measurement and reliable uncertainty analysis of the screw thread gauge calibration are complex and demanding tasks. Different technical documents and international standards in screw metrology define calibration categories, explain measurement plans, measuring elements, nominal diameters and their tolerances, and propose guidelines for the measurement uncertainty estimation. Therefore, the first part of this paper provides a detailed overview of different technical documents and international standards in screw thread metrology. The second part of this paper aims to draw attention to critical points of the pitch diameter calibration procedure that lead to a significant increase in measurement uncertainty. Most calibration laboratories do not measure the thread angle during the pitch diameter calibration. Therefore, the selection of the measurement wires can contribute greatly to the measurement uncertainty. Even though the international standards propose the best size wires to avoid this problem, many manufacturers produce measuring wires according to DIN 2269 (Zeiss). In this paper, the authors do simulations of the contribution of measuring wires to the uncertainty in the calibration of the pitch diameter of metric M threads. A simulation is created for each thread gauge according to ISO 1502, and critical threads, in which a significant increase in measurement uncertainty is expected, are highlighted. The authors propose a simple solution for avoiding this unwanted increase in measurement uncertainty of pitch diameter calibration; the solution involves replacing the DIN 2269 (Zeiss) wires with the best-size wires only for the highlighted critical threads.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of FAMENA\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of FAMENA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21278/tof.462040222\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of FAMENA","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21278/tof.462040222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

螺纹量具的检定是检定实验室和国家计量机构的常规程序。正确的测量和可靠的不确定度分析是一项复杂而艰巨的任务。螺纹计量的各种技术文件和国际标准规定了校准类别,说明了测量方案、测量元件、公称直径及其公差,并提出了测量不确定度估计的准则。因此,本文的第一部分详细概述了螺纹计量的各种技术文件和国际标准。本文的第二部分旨在引起对导致测量不确定度显著增加的节径校准过程的关键点的注意。大多数校准实验室在螺距直径校准时不测量螺纹角。因此,测量导线的选择对测量不确定度有很大影响。尽管国际标准提出了最佳尺寸的电线来避免这个问题,但许多制造商根据DIN 2269(蔡司)生产测量线。本文模拟了测量丝对公制M螺纹节径校准不确定度的影响。根据ISO 1502为每个螺纹量规创建模拟,并突出显示了测量不确定度显著增加的关键螺纹。作者提出了一种简单的解决方案,以避免这种不必要的增加测量不确定度的节径校准;该解决方案涉及将DIN 2269(蔡司)线替换为仅用于突出显示的关键螺纹的最佳尺寸线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Measurement Uncertainty of (Simple) Pitch Diameter Calibration when Selected Sizes of Zeiss Wires are Used
The calibration of screw thread gauges is a conventional procedure in calibration laboratories and National Metrology Institutes. Proper measurement and reliable uncertainty analysis of the screw thread gauge calibration are complex and demanding tasks. Different technical documents and international standards in screw metrology define calibration categories, explain measurement plans, measuring elements, nominal diameters and their tolerances, and propose guidelines for the measurement uncertainty estimation. Therefore, the first part of this paper provides a detailed overview of different technical documents and international standards in screw thread metrology. The second part of this paper aims to draw attention to critical points of the pitch diameter calibration procedure that lead to a significant increase in measurement uncertainty. Most calibration laboratories do not measure the thread angle during the pitch diameter calibration. Therefore, the selection of the measurement wires can contribute greatly to the measurement uncertainty. Even though the international standards propose the best size wires to avoid this problem, many manufacturers produce measuring wires according to DIN 2269 (Zeiss). In this paper, the authors do simulations of the contribution of measuring wires to the uncertainty in the calibration of the pitch diameter of metric M threads. A simulation is created for each thread gauge according to ISO 1502, and critical threads, in which a significant increase in measurement uncertainty is expected, are highlighted. The authors propose a simple solution for avoiding this unwanted increase in measurement uncertainty of pitch diameter calibration; the solution involves replacing the DIN 2269 (Zeiss) wires with the best-size wires only for the highlighted critical threads.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of FAMENA
Transactions of FAMENA 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.80%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research and professional papers in the following fields: Aerospace Engineering; Automotive Engineering; Biomechanics; Energetics; Engineering Design; Experimental Methods; Industrial Engineering; Machine Tools and Machining; Materials Science; Mathematical Modelling and Simulation; Mechanical Design; Mechanics & Fluid Mechanics; Nanotechnology; Naval Architecture; Numerical Methods; Process Planning; Quality Assurance; Robotics & Mechatronics; Thermodynamics.
期刊最新文献
Micro-Clearance Oil Film Temperature Field Characteristics of High Speed and Heavy Type Hydrostatic Thrust Bearing under Extreme Operating Conditions Improvement of Weld Bead Characteristics in Gas Metal Arc Welding of SA515 Carbon Steel by Applying Alternating Shielding Gas Flow Technique Software In-Loop Simulation of a Quad Tilt Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Transition Control The Matthew Effect of a Fault Classification Mechanism and Its Application Numerical Evaluation of Plane Grinding Stability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1