检察官王子:不当行为,问责制和一个温和的建议

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 LAW Catholic University Law Review Pub Date : 2013-03-25 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2239346
H. Caldwell
{"title":"检察官王子:不当行为,问责制和一个温和的建议","authors":"H. Caldwell","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2239346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will undertake an ambitious agenda, composed of eight sections: (1) setting forth the proper role of prosecutors; (2) examining the prevalence and consequences of prosecutorial misconduct; (3) identifying the primary types of prosecutorial misconduct; (4) surveying the efforts of all jurisdictions in this regard; (5) dissecting the inadequacies of current practices in coping with the problem; (6) critiquing the proposals set forth by others regarding prosecutorial abuse; (7) examining the methodology and effectiveness of independent judicial commissions as a model for commissions regarding prosecutors; and (8) offering our proposal advocating independent commissions to investigate and determine whether prosecutorial misconduct has occurred and, if so, mete out appropriate sanctions.","PeriodicalId":44667,"journal":{"name":"Catholic University Law Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"51-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prosecutor Prince: Misconduct, Accountability and a Modest Proposal\",\"authors\":\"H. Caldwell\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2239346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article will undertake an ambitious agenda, composed of eight sections: (1) setting forth the proper role of prosecutors; (2) examining the prevalence and consequences of prosecutorial misconduct; (3) identifying the primary types of prosecutorial misconduct; (4) surveying the efforts of all jurisdictions in this regard; (5) dissecting the inadequacies of current practices in coping with the problem; (6) critiquing the proposals set forth by others regarding prosecutorial abuse; (7) examining the methodology and effectiveness of independent judicial commissions as a model for commissions regarding prosecutors; and (8) offering our proposal advocating independent commissions to investigate and determine whether prosecutorial misconduct has occurred and, if so, mete out appropriate sanctions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catholic University Law Review\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"51-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catholic University Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2239346\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catholic University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2239346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这条将提出一个雄心勃勃的议程,由八个部分组成:(1)规定检察官的适当作用;(二)审查检察不当行为的普遍程度和后果;(三)确定检察渎职行为的主要类型;(4)调查所有司法管辖区在这方面的努力;(5)剖析当前应对这一问题的做法的不足;(六)对他人提出的滥用检察权的建议提出批评;(7)审查独立司法委员会的方法和效力,作为检察官委员会的典范;(8)提出我们的建议,主张成立独立委员会,调查和确定是否发生了检察官的不当行为,如果发生了,就给予适当的制裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Prosecutor Prince: Misconduct, Accountability and a Modest Proposal
This article will undertake an ambitious agenda, composed of eight sections: (1) setting forth the proper role of prosecutors; (2) examining the prevalence and consequences of prosecutorial misconduct; (3) identifying the primary types of prosecutorial misconduct; (4) surveying the efforts of all jurisdictions in this regard; (5) dissecting the inadequacies of current practices in coping with the problem; (6) critiquing the proposals set forth by others regarding prosecutorial abuse; (7) examining the methodology and effectiveness of independent judicial commissions as a model for commissions regarding prosecutors; and (8) offering our proposal advocating independent commissions to investigate and determine whether prosecutorial misconduct has occurred and, if so, mete out appropriate sanctions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
At the Intersection of Due Process and Equal Protection: Expanding the Range of Protected Interests Easing ‘The Burden of the Brutalized’: Applying Bystander Intervention Training to Corporate Conduct Partisan Gerrymandering and the Illusion of Unfairness Oversight of Oversight: A Proposal for More Effective FOIA Reform Fulfilling the Promise of Roe: A Pathway for Meaningful Pre-Abortion Consultation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1