Kangyou Huang, Zhuo Zheng, L. François, D. Guan, R. Cheddadi
{"title":"中国植物生物气候亲缘类群:观测范围与模拟范围","authors":"Kangyou Huang, Zhuo Zheng, L. François, D. Guan, R. Cheddadi","doi":"10.2174/1874213001003020024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predicting future ecosystems changes is necessary for better managing human resources. Such forecasting requires robust vegetation models which have been tested versus observed field data. Nowadays, it is very common that a simulation model is firstly validated using modern observed data and then tested versus palaeodata. In a sense, ecological data represent the natural laboratory for modelers. Thus, palaeo and actuo-ecological data are key points when dealing with predicting future changes. The present work represents the first step in such data-model comparison approach. Here, we use only modern plants distributions to test the robustness of our ecosystems definitions and use these definitions for testing a dynamic vegetation model. We have defined twenty-nine Bioclimatic affinity groups (BAGs) for 196 dominant plant species including trees, shrubs and herbs in China. These BAGs are characterized by the phenology and the climatic tolerances of the species they include. They are detailed enough to describe all vegetation types in China including the tropical, the subtropical, the temperate and the high altitude (Tibet Plateau) ecosystems. The climatic thresholds of these 29 BAGs were then used to test and validate a global dynamic vegetation model (CARAIB). The simulated BAGs are in good agreement with those observed in China, especially in the Tibetan Plateau and in the subtropical ecosystems. Broadly, all simulated BAGs fit quite well with the modern distribution. However, they all cover larger areas than the observed distributions, especially in the temperate region and in some areas in the northwest and the tropical zone. These discrepancies between simulated and observed distributions are related to the fact that the vegetation models simulate potential distributions. In China during recent decades natural ecosystems, mostly in the temperate zone, have been strongly altered in their species composition and geographical extent by different human activities such as the intense cultivation, deforestation, introduction of fast growing species and grazing.","PeriodicalId":39335,"journal":{"name":"Open Ecology Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"24-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plants Bioclimatic Affinity Groups in China: Observed vs. Simulated Ranges\",\"authors\":\"Kangyou Huang, Zhuo Zheng, L. François, D. Guan, R. Cheddadi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874213001003020024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Predicting future ecosystems changes is necessary for better managing human resources. Such forecasting requires robust vegetation models which have been tested versus observed field data. Nowadays, it is very common that a simulation model is firstly validated using modern observed data and then tested versus palaeodata. In a sense, ecological data represent the natural laboratory for modelers. Thus, palaeo and actuo-ecological data are key points when dealing with predicting future changes. The present work represents the first step in such data-model comparison approach. Here, we use only modern plants distributions to test the robustness of our ecosystems definitions and use these definitions for testing a dynamic vegetation model. We have defined twenty-nine Bioclimatic affinity groups (BAGs) for 196 dominant plant species including trees, shrubs and herbs in China. These BAGs are characterized by the phenology and the climatic tolerances of the species they include. They are detailed enough to describe all vegetation types in China including the tropical, the subtropical, the temperate and the high altitude (Tibet Plateau) ecosystems. The climatic thresholds of these 29 BAGs were then used to test and validate a global dynamic vegetation model (CARAIB). The simulated BAGs are in good agreement with those observed in China, especially in the Tibetan Plateau and in the subtropical ecosystems. Broadly, all simulated BAGs fit quite well with the modern distribution. However, they all cover larger areas than the observed distributions, especially in the temperate region and in some areas in the northwest and the tropical zone. These discrepancies between simulated and observed distributions are related to the fact that the vegetation models simulate potential distributions. In China during recent decades natural ecosystems, mostly in the temperate zone, have been strongly altered in their species composition and geographical extent by different human activities such as the intense cultivation, deforestation, introduction of fast growing species and grazing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Ecology Journal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"24-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Ecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213001003020024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Ecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213001003020024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
Plants Bioclimatic Affinity Groups in China: Observed vs. Simulated Ranges
Predicting future ecosystems changes is necessary for better managing human resources. Such forecasting requires robust vegetation models which have been tested versus observed field data. Nowadays, it is very common that a simulation model is firstly validated using modern observed data and then tested versus palaeodata. In a sense, ecological data represent the natural laboratory for modelers. Thus, palaeo and actuo-ecological data are key points when dealing with predicting future changes. The present work represents the first step in such data-model comparison approach. Here, we use only modern plants distributions to test the robustness of our ecosystems definitions and use these definitions for testing a dynamic vegetation model. We have defined twenty-nine Bioclimatic affinity groups (BAGs) for 196 dominant plant species including trees, shrubs and herbs in China. These BAGs are characterized by the phenology and the climatic tolerances of the species they include. They are detailed enough to describe all vegetation types in China including the tropical, the subtropical, the temperate and the high altitude (Tibet Plateau) ecosystems. The climatic thresholds of these 29 BAGs were then used to test and validate a global dynamic vegetation model (CARAIB). The simulated BAGs are in good agreement with those observed in China, especially in the Tibetan Plateau and in the subtropical ecosystems. Broadly, all simulated BAGs fit quite well with the modern distribution. However, they all cover larger areas than the observed distributions, especially in the temperate region and in some areas in the northwest and the tropical zone. These discrepancies between simulated and observed distributions are related to the fact that the vegetation models simulate potential distributions. In China during recent decades natural ecosystems, mostly in the temperate zone, have been strongly altered in their species composition and geographical extent by different human activities such as the intense cultivation, deforestation, introduction of fast growing species and grazing.
期刊介绍:
The Open Ecology Journal is an open access online journal which embraces the trans-disciplinary nature of ecology, seeking to publish original research articles, reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues representing important scientific progress from all areas of ecology and its linkages to other fields. The journal also focuses on the basic principles of the natural environment and its conservation. Contributions may be based on any taxa, natural or artificial environments, biodiversity, spatial scales, temporal scales, and methods that advance this multi-faceted and dynamic science. The Open Ecology Journal also considers empirical and theoretical studies that promote the construction of a broadly applicable conceptual framework or that present rigorous tests or novel applications of ecological theory.