特许学校、教育券和公益事业

D. W. Black
{"title":"特许学校、教育券和公益事业","authors":"D. W. Black","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2277371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Charter schools and vouchers have thus far been promoted or vilified based on their potential to improve academic achievement for those students enrolled in them. This debate, however, ignores a more important question: whether these educational policies serve the public good. Education as a public good cannot be reduced solely to questions of academic achievement, much less the academic achievement of a subset of students. Theoretically, charter schools and vouchers can serve the public good, but in practice, they have not. This shortcoming, however, is not necessarily due to an inherent flaw in charters or vouchers, but the failure of public policy to place limits on them to ensure they serve the public good.","PeriodicalId":83479,"journal":{"name":"Wake Forest law review","volume":"48 1","pages":"445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.2277371","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Charter Schools, Vouchers, and the Public Good\",\"authors\":\"D. W. Black\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2277371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Charter schools and vouchers have thus far been promoted or vilified based on their potential to improve academic achievement for those students enrolled in them. This debate, however, ignores a more important question: whether these educational policies serve the public good. Education as a public good cannot be reduced solely to questions of academic achievement, much less the academic achievement of a subset of students. Theoretically, charter schools and vouchers can serve the public good, but in practice, they have not. This shortcoming, however, is not necessarily due to an inherent flaw in charters or vouchers, but the failure of public policy to place limits on them to ensure they serve the public good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wake Forest law review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.2277371\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wake Forest law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2277371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wake Forest law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2277371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

迄今为止,特许学校和代金券一直受到推崇或诋毁,主要取决于它们是否有可能提高入学学生的学业成绩。然而,这场辩论忽略了一个更重要的问题:这些教育政策是否服务于公共利益。教育作为一种公共产品,不能仅仅归结为学业成绩问题,更不能归结为一小部分学生的学业成绩问题。理论上,特许学校和教育券可以服务于公共利益,但实际上却没有。然而,这一缺陷并不一定是由于包机或代金券的内在缺陷,而是由于公共政策未能对它们加以限制,以确保它们为公共利益服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Charter Schools, Vouchers, and the Public Good
Charter schools and vouchers have thus far been promoted or vilified based on their potential to improve academic achievement for those students enrolled in them. This debate, however, ignores a more important question: whether these educational policies serve the public good. Education as a public good cannot be reduced solely to questions of academic achievement, much less the academic achievement of a subset of students. Theoretically, charter schools and vouchers can serve the public good, but in practice, they have not. This shortcoming, however, is not necessarily due to an inherent flaw in charters or vouchers, but the failure of public policy to place limits on them to ensure they serve the public good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Typology of parent-child ties within families: Associations with psychological well-being. Property's Problem with Extremes Response to Reasonable Expectations in Sociocultural Context The High Cost of The Nation's Current Framework for Education Federalism Contract in Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1