左心耳闭塞后认知功能的变化

M. Laible, M. Andermann, C. Jansen, K. Hess, N. Alex, E. Geis, S. Pleger, S. Schüler, T. Rizos, Rol, R Veltkamp, S. Horstmann
{"title":"左心耳闭塞后认知功能的变化","authors":"M. Laible, M. Andermann, C. Jansen, K. Hess, N. Alex, E. Geis, S. Pleger, S. Schüler, T. Rizos, Rol, R Veltkamp, S. Horstmann","doi":"10.21767/2171-6625.1000248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cognitive dysfunction is a frequent phenomenon after surgical and cardiovascular interventions. No data on cognitive function after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are available so far. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cognitive function after LAAO compared to before LAAO. Methods and findings: Patients who underwent LAAO for treatment of atrial fibrillation at the Heidelberg Department of Internal Medicine III were eligible for this observational, explorative, single-center, non-randomized cohort study, between July 2013 and January 2016. Neurological examination and neuropsychological assessments were conducted one day before LAAO and one month after LAAO, using a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery that included several cognitive domains including executive function, verbal fluency, verbal and non-verbal memory. Paired t-tests and correlation analyses were applied to compare test results pre- and post-intervention. In addition, we descriptively analyzed the number of relevant changes (± 1 standard deviation) over all cognitive domains for each patient. 20 patients completed the study. Mean age was 72.6 ± 6.8 years and 15 (75%) were male. There were no significant changes in any of the tested cognitive domains in group statistics. Descriptive single case analysis showed more deteriorations than improvements by one standard deviation over all cognitive domains in three patients, while in 11 patients the number of positive changes exceeded the number of negative changes. Conclusion: LAAO does not adversely affect cognitive function in the majority of cases.","PeriodicalId":91329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurology and neuroscience","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21767/2171-6625.1000248","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Cognitive Function after Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion\",\"authors\":\"M. Laible, M. Andermann, C. Jansen, K. Hess, N. Alex, E. Geis, S. Pleger, S. Schüler, T. Rizos, Rol, R Veltkamp, S. Horstmann\",\"doi\":\"10.21767/2171-6625.1000248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cognitive dysfunction is a frequent phenomenon after surgical and cardiovascular interventions. No data on cognitive function after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are available so far. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cognitive function after LAAO compared to before LAAO. Methods and findings: Patients who underwent LAAO for treatment of atrial fibrillation at the Heidelberg Department of Internal Medicine III were eligible for this observational, explorative, single-center, non-randomized cohort study, between July 2013 and January 2016. Neurological examination and neuropsychological assessments were conducted one day before LAAO and one month after LAAO, using a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery that included several cognitive domains including executive function, verbal fluency, verbal and non-verbal memory. Paired t-tests and correlation analyses were applied to compare test results pre- and post-intervention. In addition, we descriptively analyzed the number of relevant changes (± 1 standard deviation) over all cognitive domains for each patient. 20 patients completed the study. Mean age was 72.6 ± 6.8 years and 15 (75%) were male. There were no significant changes in any of the tested cognitive domains in group statistics. Descriptive single case analysis showed more deteriorations than improvements by one standard deviation over all cognitive domains in three patients, while in 11 patients the number of positive changes exceeded the number of negative changes. Conclusion: LAAO does not adversely affect cognitive function in the majority of cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurology and neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21767/2171-6625.1000248\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurology and neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21767/2171-6625.1000248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21767/2171-6625.1000248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:认知功能障碍是手术和心血管干预后的常见现象。目前还没有关于左心耳闭塞(LAAO)后认知功能的资料。本研究的目的是评估LAAO后与LAAO前的认知功能。方法和结果:2013年7月至2016年1月期间,在海德堡内科III科接受LAAO治疗房颤的患者符合这项观察性、探索性、单中心、非随机队列研究的条件。在LAAO前一天和LAAO后一个月分别进行神经学检查和神经心理学评估,采用综合神经心理学测试,包括执行功能、语言流畅性、语言和非语言记忆等几个认知领域。采用配对t检验和相关分析比较干预前后的检验结果。此外,我们描述性地分析了每位患者所有认知领域的相关变化数量(±1个标准差)。20名患者完成了这项研究。平均年龄72.6±6.8岁,男性15例(75%)。在群体统计中,任何被测试的认知领域都没有显著的变化。描述性单例分析显示,3例患者在所有认知领域的恶化比改善多一个标准差,而在11例患者中,积极变化的数量超过了消极变化的数量。结论:LAAO在大多数病例中对认知功能没有不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in Cognitive Function after Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion
Background: Cognitive dysfunction is a frequent phenomenon after surgical and cardiovascular interventions. No data on cognitive function after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are available so far. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cognitive function after LAAO compared to before LAAO. Methods and findings: Patients who underwent LAAO for treatment of atrial fibrillation at the Heidelberg Department of Internal Medicine III were eligible for this observational, explorative, single-center, non-randomized cohort study, between July 2013 and January 2016. Neurological examination and neuropsychological assessments were conducted one day before LAAO and one month after LAAO, using a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery that included several cognitive domains including executive function, verbal fluency, verbal and non-verbal memory. Paired t-tests and correlation analyses were applied to compare test results pre- and post-intervention. In addition, we descriptively analyzed the number of relevant changes (± 1 standard deviation) over all cognitive domains for each patient. 20 patients completed the study. Mean age was 72.6 ± 6.8 years and 15 (75%) were male. There were no significant changes in any of the tested cognitive domains in group statistics. Descriptive single case analysis showed more deteriorations than improvements by one standard deviation over all cognitive domains in three patients, while in 11 patients the number of positive changes exceeded the number of negative changes. Conclusion: LAAO does not adversely affect cognitive function in the majority of cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biopsychosocial Implications of Crystal Methamphetamine Abuse: A Review of Literature Assessing Neural Oscillations during Erotic and Negative Emotional Pictures Viewing: An Event-Related Potential Study Challenges in Diagnosis of Ischaemic Stroke: A Descriptive Study of Stroke Mimics and Missed Strokes Hornerandrsquo;s Syndrome due to a Spontaneous Internal Carotid Artery Dissection treated with Casper Stent The Impact of 24-Hour Ambulatory EEG in the Clinical Approach to Patients with Suspected Epilepsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1