供者风险指数和MELD评分在肝移植术后移植物存活预测中的相互作用。OPTN-UNOS数据库分析

Avolio A.W., S. Agnes, M. Siciliano, F. Ponziani, A. Grieco, N. Nicolotti, E. Annicchiarico, G. Boscarino, M. Barone
{"title":"供者风险指数和MELD评分在肝移植术后移植物存活预测中的相互作用。OPTN-UNOS数据库分析","authors":"Avolio A.W., S. Agnes, M. Siciliano, F. Ponziani, A. Grieco, N. Nicolotti, E. Annicchiarico, G. Boscarino, M. Barone","doi":"10.2174/1874418401105010050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Donor Risk Index (DRI) has been introduced to predict post-transplant graft survival (GS) using donor data. The MELD score, which is the gold-standard in scoring liver disease in liver transplant candidates, has a low prognostic significance. The present analysis is aimed to assess the role of DRI and of MELD score in predicting the outcome after liver transplantation, in short (180 days) and medium term (1460 days). The Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN) database relevant to 23.392 consecutive cases in the MELD era was used. Cases were stratified in classes according to DRI (4 classes), MELD (6 classes), and DRI-MELD match (24 classes). GS was assessed by Kaplan Meier method at 0-1460 days. Differences were tested by Log-rank test. All three parameters allow an effective stratification. Using the DRI, the gaps between the highest and lowest GS were 7.8% and 14.9%, at 180 and 1460 days, respectively. Using the MELD score, the gaps were 10.2% and 9.5%, respectively. Using DRI-MELD, the gaps were 25.5% and 35.4%, respectively. Both the DRI and the MELD can predict the outcome, although the predictive power of the DRI is the highest of the two, and the predictive power of the donor- recipient match, is even higher.","PeriodicalId":90368,"journal":{"name":"The open transplantation journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"50-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donor Risk Index and MELD Score Interactions in Graft Survival Prediction after Liver Transplantation. An Analysis of the OPTN-UNOS Database\",\"authors\":\"Avolio A.W., S. Agnes, M. Siciliano, F. Ponziani, A. Grieco, N. Nicolotti, E. Annicchiarico, G. Boscarino, M. Barone\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874418401105010050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Donor Risk Index (DRI) has been introduced to predict post-transplant graft survival (GS) using donor data. The MELD score, which is the gold-standard in scoring liver disease in liver transplant candidates, has a low prognostic significance. The present analysis is aimed to assess the role of DRI and of MELD score in predicting the outcome after liver transplantation, in short (180 days) and medium term (1460 days). The Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN) database relevant to 23.392 consecutive cases in the MELD era was used. Cases were stratified in classes according to DRI (4 classes), MELD (6 classes), and DRI-MELD match (24 classes). GS was assessed by Kaplan Meier method at 0-1460 days. Differences were tested by Log-rank test. All three parameters allow an effective stratification. Using the DRI, the gaps between the highest and lowest GS were 7.8% and 14.9%, at 180 and 1460 days, respectively. Using the MELD score, the gaps were 10.2% and 9.5%, respectively. Using DRI-MELD, the gaps were 25.5% and 35.4%, respectively. Both the DRI and the MELD can predict the outcome, although the predictive power of the DRI is the highest of the two, and the predictive power of the donor- recipient match, is even higher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open transplantation journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"50-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open transplantation journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874418401105010050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open transplantation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874418401105010050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

供体风险指数(DRI)已被引入预测移植后移植生存(GS)使用供体数据。MELD评分是评价肝移植候选人肝脏疾病的金标准,但其预后意义较低。本分析旨在评估DRI和MELD评分在预测肝移植术后短期(180天)和中期(1460天)预后方面的作用。使用与MELD时代23.392例连续病例相关的器官获取移植网络(OPTN)数据库。根据DRI(4例)、MELD(6例)和DRI-MELD匹配(24例)对病例进行分类。在0 ~ 1460天采用Kaplan Meier法评估GS。差异采用Log-rank检验。所有这三个参数允许有效分层。利用DRI,最高GS值与最低GS值之间的差距分别为7.8%和14.9%,分别为180天和1460天。使用MELD评分,差距分别为10.2%和9.5%。使用DRI-MELD,两者的差距分别为25.5%和35.4%。DRI和MELD都可以预测结果,尽管DRI的预测能力是两者中最高的,而供体-受体匹配的预测能力更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Donor Risk Index and MELD Score Interactions in Graft Survival Prediction after Liver Transplantation. An Analysis of the OPTN-UNOS Database
Donor Risk Index (DRI) has been introduced to predict post-transplant graft survival (GS) using donor data. The MELD score, which is the gold-standard in scoring liver disease in liver transplant candidates, has a low prognostic significance. The present analysis is aimed to assess the role of DRI and of MELD score in predicting the outcome after liver transplantation, in short (180 days) and medium term (1460 days). The Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN) database relevant to 23.392 consecutive cases in the MELD era was used. Cases were stratified in classes according to DRI (4 classes), MELD (6 classes), and DRI-MELD match (24 classes). GS was assessed by Kaplan Meier method at 0-1460 days. Differences were tested by Log-rank test. All three parameters allow an effective stratification. Using the DRI, the gaps between the highest and lowest GS were 7.8% and 14.9%, at 180 and 1460 days, respectively. Using the MELD score, the gaps were 10.2% and 9.5%, respectively. Using DRI-MELD, the gaps were 25.5% and 35.4%, respectively. Both the DRI and the MELD can predict the outcome, although the predictive power of the DRI is the highest of the two, and the predictive power of the donor- recipient match, is even higher.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Quality of Life After Lung Transplantation First Demonstration of the Effects of Remote Per- and Postconditioning onIschemia and Reperfusion Induced Hepatic Injury Effect of Hepatic Steatosis on Bioenergetic Function During HepaticIschemia-reperfusion: A Systematic Review Transplant Recipients’ Experience of Participation at the World TransplantGames in Gothenburg 2011: A Study of Psychological Well-being Sequential Liver Chemistry Profiling and Abdominal Ultrasound Assessments to Predict Biliary Strictures after Liver Transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1