美国红隼和鹪鹩卵表面细菌菌群的比较

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Open Ornithology Journal Pub Date : 2014-09-08 DOI:10.2174/1874453201407010040
Beth A. Potte, E. Hyde, H. Pier, M. Rutter, M. Voss
{"title":"美国红隼和鹪鹩卵表面细菌菌群的比较","authors":"Beth A. Potte, E. Hyde, H. Pier, M. Rutter, M. Voss","doi":"10.2174/1874453201407010040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is generally accepted that avian eggs acquire a microflora during ovipositioning. The goal of this study was to identify and compare the eggshell microflora of two avian species, House Wrens and American Kestrels. Differences in the nesting habitats and incubation behavior of these species suggest that their eggshell microfloras also should differ. Culture-dependent techniques were combined with sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to identify bacteria in samples taken from American Kestrel eggs during late incubation. These data were compared to previously collected data from House Wren eggs. In both studies, bacteria were isolated from three different phyla, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The eggshell microflora of Kestrels was dominated by bacteria in the Actinobacteria and Firmicutes phyla during late incubation, whereas the eggshell microflora of House Wrens was dominated by bacteria in the Gamma-Proteobacteria subphylum during preand late-incubation and bacteria within the Fimicutes phylum during early incubation. Actinobacteria genera on House Wren and American Kestrel eggshells differed, but the prominent genera in the GammaProteobacteria and Firmicutes phyla, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus, respectively, were similar between bird species. Thus, our results suggest that the microflora of avian eggshells have both variable (i.e., phyla) and conserved (i.e., specific genera) aspects of bacterial diversity.","PeriodicalId":39058,"journal":{"name":"Open Ornithology Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the bacterial microflora found on the surface of American kestrel and House Wren eggs\",\"authors\":\"Beth A. Potte, E. Hyde, H. Pier, M. Rutter, M. Voss\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874453201407010040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is generally accepted that avian eggs acquire a microflora during ovipositioning. The goal of this study was to identify and compare the eggshell microflora of two avian species, House Wrens and American Kestrels. Differences in the nesting habitats and incubation behavior of these species suggest that their eggshell microfloras also should differ. Culture-dependent techniques were combined with sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to identify bacteria in samples taken from American Kestrel eggs during late incubation. These data were compared to previously collected data from House Wren eggs. In both studies, bacteria were isolated from three different phyla, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The eggshell microflora of Kestrels was dominated by bacteria in the Actinobacteria and Firmicutes phyla during late incubation, whereas the eggshell microflora of House Wrens was dominated by bacteria in the Gamma-Proteobacteria subphylum during preand late-incubation and bacteria within the Fimicutes phylum during early incubation. Actinobacteria genera on House Wren and American Kestrel eggshells differed, but the prominent genera in the GammaProteobacteria and Firmicutes phyla, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus, respectively, were similar between bird species. Thus, our results suggest that the microflora of avian eggshells have both variable (i.e., phyla) and conserved (i.e., specific genera) aspects of bacterial diversity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Ornithology Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"40-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Ornithology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874453201407010040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Ornithology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874453201407010040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

人们普遍认为,鸟蛋在产卵过程中获得微生物群。本研究的目的是鉴定和比较两种鸟类——鹪鹩和美洲红隼的蛋壳微生物群。这些物种的筑巢栖息地和孵化行为的差异表明它们的蛋壳微生物区系也应该不同。培养依赖技术与16S rRNA基因测序相结合,鉴定了美国红隼卵孵育后期样品中的细菌。这些数据与之前从鹪鹩卵中收集的数据进行了比较。在这两项研究中,细菌分离自三个不同的门,放线菌门,厚壁菌门和变形菌门。红隼孵育后期蛋壳菌群以放线菌门和厚壁菌门细菌为主,鹪鹩孵育前和孵育后期蛋壳菌群以γ -变形菌门细菌为主,孵育早期蛋壳菌群以厚壁菌门细菌为主。家鹪鹩和美洲红隼蛋壳上的放线菌属不同,但γ变形菌门和厚壁菌门、假单胞菌和葡萄球菌的突出属在鸟类之间相似。因此,我们的研究结果表明,鸟类蛋壳的微生物群既有可变(即门)的细菌多样性,也有保守(即特定属)的细菌多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of the bacterial microflora found on the surface of American kestrel and House Wren eggs
It is generally accepted that avian eggs acquire a microflora during ovipositioning. The goal of this study was to identify and compare the eggshell microflora of two avian species, House Wrens and American Kestrels. Differences in the nesting habitats and incubation behavior of these species suggest that their eggshell microfloras also should differ. Culture-dependent techniques were combined with sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to identify bacteria in samples taken from American Kestrel eggs during late incubation. These data were compared to previously collected data from House Wren eggs. In both studies, bacteria were isolated from three different phyla, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The eggshell microflora of Kestrels was dominated by bacteria in the Actinobacteria and Firmicutes phyla during late incubation, whereas the eggshell microflora of House Wrens was dominated by bacteria in the Gamma-Proteobacteria subphylum during preand late-incubation and bacteria within the Fimicutes phylum during early incubation. Actinobacteria genera on House Wren and American Kestrel eggshells differed, but the prominent genera in the GammaProteobacteria and Firmicutes phyla, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus, respectively, were similar between bird species. Thus, our results suggest that the microflora of avian eggshells have both variable (i.e., phyla) and conserved (i.e., specific genera) aspects of bacterial diversity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Ornithology Journal
Open Ornithology Journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Open Ornithology Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of ornithology including avian behaviour,genetics, phylogeography , conservation, demography, ecology, evolution, and morphology. The Open Ornithology Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and making them freely available to researchers worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Description of New American Carduelis/Spinus Bird Species in La Paz (Bolivia): C./S. lapazensis. Glucose Concentrations in Closely Related Titmice (Baeolophus) Species Linked to Regional Habitat Differences Across an Avian Hybrid Zone Bird Diversity in Nensebo Moist Afromontane Forest Fragment, South Eastern Ethiopia. Influence of Disturbance on Avian Communities in Agricultural Conservation Buffers in Mississippi, USA Threats and Vision for the Conservation of Galápagos Birds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1