{"title":"非线性Hammerstein积分方程的Sinc逼近与微分变换方法的比较","authors":"G. K. Gelian, R. Shirvani, M. A. Araghi","doi":"10.22075/IJNAA.2020.19923.2111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here, the comparison between Sinc method in combination with double exponential transformations (DE) and approximation by means of differential transform method (DTM) for nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations is considered. Convergence analysis is presented. Detection of effectiveness from various aspects such as run time, different norms, condition number are highlighted and plotted graphically. Results of two schemes are practically well, but in manner of separable kernel, DTM solution is more accurate and so fast.","PeriodicalId":14240,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications","volume":"25 1","pages":"1291-1301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Sinc approximation and differential transform methods for nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations\",\"authors\":\"G. K. Gelian, R. Shirvani, M. A. Araghi\",\"doi\":\"10.22075/IJNAA.2020.19923.2111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Here, the comparison between Sinc method in combination with double exponential transformations (DE) and approximation by means of differential transform method (DTM) for nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations is considered. Convergence analysis is presented. Detection of effectiveness from various aspects such as run time, different norms, condition number are highlighted and plotted graphically. Results of two schemes are practically well, but in manner of separable kernel, DTM solution is more accurate and so fast.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1291-1301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22075/IJNAA.2020.19923.2111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22075/IJNAA.2020.19923.2111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison between Sinc approximation and differential transform methods for nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations
Here, the comparison between Sinc method in combination with double exponential transformations (DE) and approximation by means of differential transform method (DTM) for nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations is considered. Convergence analysis is presented. Detection of effectiveness from various aspects such as run time, different norms, condition number are highlighted and plotted graphically. Results of two schemes are practically well, but in manner of separable kernel, DTM solution is more accurate and so fast.