来看看MIRAT:法律推理被分割成可学习的块

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Legal Education Review Pub Date : 1991-03-23 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2406990
J. Wade
{"title":"来看看MIRAT:法律推理被分割成可学习的块","authors":"J. Wade","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2406990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper sets out an acronym MIRAT which summarises the standard framework and cycle expected for answers in law school exams, and to a lesser extent for advice in legal practice. The letters stand for Material facts, Issues, Rules, Arguments each way, and Tentative conclusion.","PeriodicalId":43058,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education Review","volume":"2 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1991-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meet MIRAT: Legal Reasoning Fragmented into Learnable Chunks\",\"authors\":\"J. Wade\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2406990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper sets out an acronym MIRAT which summarises the standard framework and cycle expected for answers in law school exams, and to a lesser extent for advice in legal practice. The letters stand for Material facts, Issues, Rules, Arguments each way, and Tentative conclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Education Review\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2406990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2406990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文列出了一个缩略词MIRAT,它总结了法学院考试中预期答案的标准框架和周期,并在较小程度上为法律实践中的建议。这些字母分别代表材料事实、问题、规则、各方面的论点和初步结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meet MIRAT: Legal Reasoning Fragmented into Learnable Chunks
This paper sets out an acronym MIRAT which summarises the standard framework and cycle expected for answers in law school exams, and to a lesser extent for advice in legal practice. The letters stand for Material facts, Issues, Rules, Arguments each way, and Tentative conclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Legal Education Review
Legal Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Computing Legal Analysis: A Guided Approach to Problem Solving in Contract Law Keep it Real: The Case for Introducing Authentic Tasks in the Undergraduate Law Degree Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding Limitations and Advocating for a Gold Standard for Measuring Teaching Effectiveness Trial Advocacy and Nitojutsu Legal Clinical Education in China: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1