美国联邦贸易委员会作为互联网隐私规范的企业家

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Vanderbilt Law Review Pub Date : 2001-02-15 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.253317
S. Hetcher
{"title":"美国联邦贸易委员会作为互联网隐私规范的企业家","authors":"S. Hetcher","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.253317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his article entitled \"The FTC as Internet Privacy Norm Entrepreneur,\" Professor Steven Hetcher takes a closer look into the Federal Trade Commission's efforts to promote online privacy by means of website privacy policies. In his analysis, Professor Hetcher employs a public choice approach to model the FTC's activities with the hope of better understanding what may really be motivating the FTC's policy choices. This article considers and rejects the supposition that the FTC's purported efforts to promote industry self-regulation indicate that the agency has been captured by the industry. Instead, Professor Hetcher charges that the FTC's endorsement of self-regulation of the Internet is simply a ruse whereby this powerful industry will come to completely dominate the personal data of the consuming public, resulting in the complete disappearance of individual informational privacy. This article considers the FTC's role as an internet privacy norm entrepreneur. Professor Hetcher argues that once websites are induced to make representations in writing via privacy policies, it is easier for the FTC to seek enforcement actions for deceptive trade practices. The FTC's promotion of privacy policies thus allows the agency to increase its jurisdiction. The FTC's seeming attempts to promote industry self-regulation have all the while been establishing the predicate for their jurisdictional grasp over website activities. Because the FTC is able to gain a jurisdictional foothold by means of promoting more respected website privacy norms, the agency is aptly characterized as an internet privacy norm entrepreneur.","PeriodicalId":47503,"journal":{"name":"Vanderbilt Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2001-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.253317","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The FTC as Internet Privacy Norm Entrepreneur\",\"authors\":\"S. Hetcher\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.253317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his article entitled \\\"The FTC as Internet Privacy Norm Entrepreneur,\\\" Professor Steven Hetcher takes a closer look into the Federal Trade Commission's efforts to promote online privacy by means of website privacy policies. In his analysis, Professor Hetcher employs a public choice approach to model the FTC's activities with the hope of better understanding what may really be motivating the FTC's policy choices. This article considers and rejects the supposition that the FTC's purported efforts to promote industry self-regulation indicate that the agency has been captured by the industry. Instead, Professor Hetcher charges that the FTC's endorsement of self-regulation of the Internet is simply a ruse whereby this powerful industry will come to completely dominate the personal data of the consuming public, resulting in the complete disappearance of individual informational privacy. This article considers the FTC's role as an internet privacy norm entrepreneur. Professor Hetcher argues that once websites are induced to make representations in writing via privacy policies, it is easier for the FTC to seek enforcement actions for deceptive trade practices. The FTC's promotion of privacy policies thus allows the agency to increase its jurisdiction. The FTC's seeming attempts to promote industry self-regulation have all the while been establishing the predicate for their jurisdictional grasp over website activities. Because the FTC is able to gain a jurisdictional foothold by means of promoting more respected website privacy norms, the agency is aptly characterized as an internet privacy norm entrepreneur.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vanderbilt Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.253317\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vanderbilt Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.253317\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanderbilt Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.253317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

Steven Hetcher教授在他题为《作为互联网隐私规范企业家的联邦贸易委员会》的文章中,深入研究了联邦贸易委员会通过网站隐私政策来促进在线隐私的努力。在他的分析中,赫切尔教授采用了一种公共选择的方法来模拟联邦贸易委员会的活动,希望能更好地理解是什么真正推动了联邦贸易委员会的政策选择。本文考虑并拒绝了这样一种假设,即联邦贸易委员会所谓的促进行业自律的努力表明该机构已被行业所俘获。相反,Hetcher教授指责联邦贸易委员会对互联网自我监管的认可仅仅是一个诡计,这个强大的行业将完全支配消费公众的个人数据,导致个人信息隐私的完全消失。本文考虑了联邦贸易委员会作为互联网隐私规范企业家的角色。赫切尔教授认为,一旦网站被诱使通过隐私政策做出书面陈述,联邦贸易委员会就更容易对欺骗性贸易行为采取执法行动。因此,联邦贸易委员会对隐私政策的促进使该机构能够扩大其管辖权。联邦贸易委员会表面上促进行业自律的努力,一直在为他们对网站活动的管辖权掌握奠定基础。由于联邦贸易委员会能够通过促进更受尊重的网站隐私规范来获得司法立足点,因此该机构被恰当地描述为互联网隐私规范的企业家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The FTC as Internet Privacy Norm Entrepreneur
In his article entitled "The FTC as Internet Privacy Norm Entrepreneur," Professor Steven Hetcher takes a closer look into the Federal Trade Commission's efforts to promote online privacy by means of website privacy policies. In his analysis, Professor Hetcher employs a public choice approach to model the FTC's activities with the hope of better understanding what may really be motivating the FTC's policy choices. This article considers and rejects the supposition that the FTC's purported efforts to promote industry self-regulation indicate that the agency has been captured by the industry. Instead, Professor Hetcher charges that the FTC's endorsement of self-regulation of the Internet is simply a ruse whereby this powerful industry will come to completely dominate the personal data of the consuming public, resulting in the complete disappearance of individual informational privacy. This article considers the FTC's role as an internet privacy norm entrepreneur. Professor Hetcher argues that once websites are induced to make representations in writing via privacy policies, it is easier for the FTC to seek enforcement actions for deceptive trade practices. The FTC's promotion of privacy policies thus allows the agency to increase its jurisdiction. The FTC's seeming attempts to promote industry self-regulation have all the while been establishing the predicate for their jurisdictional grasp over website activities. Because the FTC is able to gain a jurisdictional foothold by means of promoting more respected website privacy norms, the agency is aptly characterized as an internet privacy norm entrepreneur.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is an online forum designed to advance scholarly discussion. En Banc offers professors, practitioners, students, and others an opportunity to respond to articles printed in the Vanderbilt Law Review. En Banc permits extended discussion of our articles in a way that maintains academic integrity and provides authors with a quicker approach to publication. When reexamining a case “en banc” an appellate court operates at its highest level, with all judges present and participating “on the bench.” We chose the name “En Banc” to capture this spirit of focused review and provide a forum for further dialogue where all can be present and participate.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Wickedness: Managing Complex Systems and Climate Change Formal Justice and Judicial Precedent Rights, Wrongs, and Recourse in the Law of Torts Discovery Cost Allocation, Due Process, and the Constitution's Role in Civil Litigation Judging Law in Election Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1