{"title":"学生对高等教育语言测试与评估的认知","authors":"Reyhan Ağçam, M. P. Babanoğlu","doi":"10.22521/UNIBULLETIN.2016.512.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment is any of a variety of procedures used to obtain information about student performance (Linn & Gronlund, 2000, p. 32). As reported by Pellegrino, Chudowsky, and Glaser (2001), it provides feedback to students, educators, parents, policy makers, and the public about the effectiveness of educational services. Related research on language testing and assessment in foreign language education, which is one of the most controversial issues in Turkey, have been carried out with a focus on perspectives of teachers rather than the students who obviously play the leading role in the process. Hence, the current study is primarily motivated to explore the perceptions of students on foreign language assessment in higher education in Turkey. A total of 103 undergraduate students attending an English Language Preparatory Program at a state university in Turkey took part in the study. They were assigned a questionnaire consisting of openand closed-ended items to reveal their perceptions on the applications of language assessment in higher education (e.g. core language skills, assessment types employed in testing foreign language development, and types of questions used in the tests throughout an academic year). The findings have demonstrated that most participants found assessment necessary in their foreign language education, and that speaking and listening are considered the most important skills, while grammar and reading are regarded as the least important. As for question types, Selected Response Items (e.g. Matching, MC, Odd-one-out, and T-F) have revealed the most-favored by students in comparison to the Constructed Response Items (e.g. Sentence Completion, WhQuestions, and etc.) and Personal Response items (e.g. writing a paragraph), which might be attributed to the less challenging and demanding structure of the selected response items. The study concludes with a few pedagogical implications on language assessment in higher education, and suggestions for further directions.","PeriodicalId":31152,"journal":{"name":"Universitepark Bulten","volume":"5 1","pages":"66-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students’ Perceptions of Language Testing and Assessment in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Reyhan Ağçam, M. P. Babanoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.22521/UNIBULLETIN.2016.512.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessment is any of a variety of procedures used to obtain information about student performance (Linn & Gronlund, 2000, p. 32). As reported by Pellegrino, Chudowsky, and Glaser (2001), it provides feedback to students, educators, parents, policy makers, and the public about the effectiveness of educational services. Related research on language testing and assessment in foreign language education, which is one of the most controversial issues in Turkey, have been carried out with a focus on perspectives of teachers rather than the students who obviously play the leading role in the process. Hence, the current study is primarily motivated to explore the perceptions of students on foreign language assessment in higher education in Turkey. A total of 103 undergraduate students attending an English Language Preparatory Program at a state university in Turkey took part in the study. They were assigned a questionnaire consisting of openand closed-ended items to reveal their perceptions on the applications of language assessment in higher education (e.g. core language skills, assessment types employed in testing foreign language development, and types of questions used in the tests throughout an academic year). The findings have demonstrated that most participants found assessment necessary in their foreign language education, and that speaking and listening are considered the most important skills, while grammar and reading are regarded as the least important. As for question types, Selected Response Items (e.g. Matching, MC, Odd-one-out, and T-F) have revealed the most-favored by students in comparison to the Constructed Response Items (e.g. Sentence Completion, WhQuestions, and etc.) and Personal Response items (e.g. writing a paragraph), which might be attributed to the less challenging and demanding structure of the selected response items. The study concludes with a few pedagogical implications on language assessment in higher education, and suggestions for further directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universitepark Bulten\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"66-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universitepark Bulten\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22521/UNIBULLETIN.2016.512.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universitepark Bulten","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22521/UNIBULLETIN.2016.512.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
评估是用于获取学生表现信息的各种程序中的任何一种(Linn & Gronlund, 2000, p. 32)。正如Pellegrino、Chudowsky和Glaser(2001)所报道的那样,它向学生、教育者、家长、政策制定者和公众提供了关于教育服务有效性的反馈。在土耳其,外语教育中的语言测试与评价是一个最具争议的问题,但相关研究的重点是教师的观点,而不是在这一过程中明显起主导作用的学生的观点。因此,本研究的主要目的是探讨土耳其高等教育中学生对外语评估的看法。共有103名就读于土耳其一所州立大学英语预备课程的本科生参与了这项研究。他们被分配了一份由开放式和封闭式项目组成的问卷,以揭示他们对高等教育中语言评估应用的看法(例如,核心语言技能、测试外语发展所采用的评估类型以及整个学年测试中使用的问题类型)。调查结果表明,大多数参与者认为评估在他们的外语教育中是必要的,口语和听力被认为是最重要的技能,而语法和阅读被认为是最不重要的。在题型方面,选择题型(如Matching、MC、Odd-one-out、T-F)比构造题型(如Sentence Completion、WhQuestions等)和个人题型(如writing a paragraph)更受学生青睐,这可能是由于选择题型的结构不那么具有挑战性和要求。本研究总结了高等教育语言评估的教学意义,并对未来的发展方向提出了建议。
Students’ Perceptions of Language Testing and Assessment in Higher Education
Assessment is any of a variety of procedures used to obtain information about student performance (Linn & Gronlund, 2000, p. 32). As reported by Pellegrino, Chudowsky, and Glaser (2001), it provides feedback to students, educators, parents, policy makers, and the public about the effectiveness of educational services. Related research on language testing and assessment in foreign language education, which is one of the most controversial issues in Turkey, have been carried out with a focus on perspectives of teachers rather than the students who obviously play the leading role in the process. Hence, the current study is primarily motivated to explore the perceptions of students on foreign language assessment in higher education in Turkey. A total of 103 undergraduate students attending an English Language Preparatory Program at a state university in Turkey took part in the study. They were assigned a questionnaire consisting of openand closed-ended items to reveal their perceptions on the applications of language assessment in higher education (e.g. core language skills, assessment types employed in testing foreign language development, and types of questions used in the tests throughout an academic year). The findings have demonstrated that most participants found assessment necessary in their foreign language education, and that speaking and listening are considered the most important skills, while grammar and reading are regarded as the least important. As for question types, Selected Response Items (e.g. Matching, MC, Odd-one-out, and T-F) have revealed the most-favored by students in comparison to the Constructed Response Items (e.g. Sentence Completion, WhQuestions, and etc.) and Personal Response items (e.g. writing a paragraph), which might be attributed to the less challenging and demanding structure of the selected response items. The study concludes with a few pedagogical implications on language assessment in higher education, and suggestions for further directions.