谈判桌上的公民社会、合法性、信仰与持久和平

Q4 Social Sciences Peace and Conflict Studies Pub Date : 2015-03-08 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2575395
Direnç Kanol
{"title":"谈判桌上的公民社会、合法性、信仰与持久和平","authors":"Direnç Kanol","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2575395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is argued that including civil society at the negotiation table can increase the perceived legitimacy of peace treaties. As a result, it can contribute to the consolidation of peace. In this paper, the author presents the findings from a controlled experiment in order to test the impact of inclusive peace negotiations on the perceived legitimacy of peace treaties. Contrary to the expectations of the scholars working on the inclusiveness and the consolidation of peace hypothesis, the results show that the treatment group in the experiment does not perceive inclusive peace agreements to be more legitimate.","PeriodicalId":52516,"journal":{"name":"Peace and Conflict Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"4-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Civil Society at the Negotiation Table, Legitimacy Beliefs and Durable Peace\",\"authors\":\"Direnç Kanol\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2575395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is argued that including civil society at the negotiation table can increase the perceived legitimacy of peace treaties. As a result, it can contribute to the consolidation of peace. In this paper, the author presents the findings from a controlled experiment in order to test the impact of inclusive peace negotiations on the perceived legitimacy of peace treaties. Contrary to the expectations of the scholars working on the inclusiveness and the consolidation of peace hypothesis, the results show that the treatment group in the experiment does not perceive inclusive peace agreements to be more legitimate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peace and Conflict Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"4-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peace and Conflict Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2575395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peace and Conflict Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2575395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

有人认为,将民间社会纳入谈判桌上可以增加和平条约的合法性。因此,它可以为巩固和平作出贡献。在本文中,作者提出了一项对照实验的结果,以测试包容性和平谈判对和平条约的感知合法性的影响。与研究包容性和巩固和平假设的学者的预期相反,结果表明,实验中的实验组并不认为包容性和平协议更合法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Civil Society at the Negotiation Table, Legitimacy Beliefs and Durable Peace
It is argued that including civil society at the negotiation table can increase the perceived legitimacy of peace treaties. As a result, it can contribute to the consolidation of peace. In this paper, the author presents the findings from a controlled experiment in order to test the impact of inclusive peace negotiations on the perceived legitimacy of peace treaties. Contrary to the expectations of the scholars working on the inclusiveness and the consolidation of peace hypothesis, the results show that the treatment group in the experiment does not perceive inclusive peace agreements to be more legitimate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peace and Conflict Studies
Peace and Conflict Studies Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RMB Internationalization and Belt and Road Initiative with the Chinese approach to the RMB Inflow-Outflow Imbalance Refugees as Threats and Aid as Deterrence Tool: How Do Refugee Movements Affect Aid Allocation of European Donors? Internalization of Sustainable Development Goals by Local Governments: An Analysis on the Adoption and Diffusion of SDGs Policy Ethnic Inequality and Support for Democracy in Africa Postmodern War and the Politics of Speed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1