重塑税收支出改革:根据《政府绩效与成果法》改进项目监督

M. L. Heen
{"title":"重塑税收支出改革:根据《政府绩效与成果法》改进项目监督","authors":"M. L. Heen","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.258973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article examines the Government Performance and Results Act framework for performance-based management and oversight of federally-funded programs, describes emerging efforts to incorporate tax expenditures into the performance review process, and places these developments into context by evaluating past experiences with tax expenditure reform. Government-wide performance-based management reforms provide a promising executive branch mechanism for achieving more coordinated review of functionally related government programs, whether funded or implemented through direct expenditures, tax expenditures, or regulatory programs. However, as past experience illustrates (including, for example, experience with employment subsidies such as the Work Opportunity Tax Credit and the Welfare-to-Work Tax Credit), significant institutional obstacles stand in the way of comprehensive reform. The Article ends with a discussion of the type of fundamental structural reforms that will be needed before meaningful legislative oversight of functionally related government programs can be achieved.","PeriodicalId":83479,"journal":{"name":"Wake Forest law review","volume":"35 1","pages":"751"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.258973","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinventing Tax Expenditure Reform: Improving Program Oversight Under the Government Performance and Results Act\",\"authors\":\"M. L. Heen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.258973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article examines the Government Performance and Results Act framework for performance-based management and oversight of federally-funded programs, describes emerging efforts to incorporate tax expenditures into the performance review process, and places these developments into context by evaluating past experiences with tax expenditure reform. Government-wide performance-based management reforms provide a promising executive branch mechanism for achieving more coordinated review of functionally related government programs, whether funded or implemented through direct expenditures, tax expenditures, or regulatory programs. However, as past experience illustrates (including, for example, experience with employment subsidies such as the Work Opportunity Tax Credit and the Welfare-to-Work Tax Credit), significant institutional obstacles stand in the way of comprehensive reform. The Article ends with a discussion of the type of fundamental structural reforms that will be needed before meaningful legislative oversight of functionally related government programs can be achieved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wake Forest law review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.258973\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wake Forest law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.258973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wake Forest law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.258973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文考察了《政府绩效与结果法》框架对联邦资助项目的绩效管理和监督,描述了将税收支出纳入绩效审查过程的新努力,并通过评估过去税收支出改革的经验将这些发展置于背景中。政府范围内基于绩效的管理改革提供了一种有希望的行政部门机制,可以对与职能相关的政府项目进行更协调的审查,无论是通过直接支出、税收支出还是监管项目资助或实施的。然而,正如过去的经验所表明的那样(例如,包括就业补贴的经验,如工作机会税收抵免和福利工作税收抵免),重大的制度障碍阻碍了全面改革。文章最后讨论了在对政府职能相关项目进行有意义的立法监督之前需要进行的基本结构改革的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reinventing Tax Expenditure Reform: Improving Program Oversight Under the Government Performance and Results Act
This Article examines the Government Performance and Results Act framework for performance-based management and oversight of federally-funded programs, describes emerging efforts to incorporate tax expenditures into the performance review process, and places these developments into context by evaluating past experiences with tax expenditure reform. Government-wide performance-based management reforms provide a promising executive branch mechanism for achieving more coordinated review of functionally related government programs, whether funded or implemented through direct expenditures, tax expenditures, or regulatory programs. However, as past experience illustrates (including, for example, experience with employment subsidies such as the Work Opportunity Tax Credit and the Welfare-to-Work Tax Credit), significant institutional obstacles stand in the way of comprehensive reform. The Article ends with a discussion of the type of fundamental structural reforms that will be needed before meaningful legislative oversight of functionally related government programs can be achieved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Typology of parent-child ties within families: Associations with psychological well-being. Property's Problem with Extremes Response to Reasonable Expectations in Sociocultural Context The High Cost of The Nation's Current Framework for Education Federalism Contract in Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1